In this new age we live today a good argument requires proof, credibility, emotion and more. There are many things to do to win a crowd over or simply make them think about what they did or what they should do in a future nearby. Communicating Rhetorically is a must to give a concise argument, the speaker must plan accordingly and deliver a strong persuasive message with one of Aristotle’s core tents.
Aristotle’s Logos is the best approach communicating in rhetorical situations. In a court case study a lawyer has to give credibility to his client and convince not only the judge but the jury as well, by communicating rhetorically utilizing the Logos approach providing sufficient evidence, facts and logic he could potentially win the case.
Another approach I would highly consider is the Pathos. Emotional situations tend to attract more of an audience and give the wow factor to those with issues. To give an example going …show more content…
Information released could be fake or could not, but how do I know? Most information websites have reputations to uphold and giving false information is not the correct thing to do if they want active members. With the broad search engines and websites, I look for credible sources like local news websites or find three to more websites of the exact news and look at the information.
Information can be misinterpreted with just one wrong text, but a good journalist always follows the trail and comes to a conclusion. Supporting documentation is always important as well if available, like a police report or a witness that can support the credibility of the statement or information that is being said. If this information cannot be provided or found, how can the information be exact, precise and What is there to do but to trust that the information provided to us is correct and go above and beyond what is required to provide good results to those who need