Preview

Exemptions to Section 499 IPC

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1556 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Exemptions to Section 499 IPC
Explain with suitable examples 'Exceptions for IPC Sec 499’

IC Sec 499 states that:

“ Defamation.-- Whoever by words either spoken or intended to be read, or by signs or by visible representations, makes or publishes any imputation concerning any person intending to harm, or knowing or having reason to believe that such imputation will harm, the reputation of such person, is said, except in the cases hereinafter excepted, to defame that person.
Explanation 1.- It may amount to defamation to impute anything to a deceased person, if the imputation would harm the reputation of that person if living, and is intended to be hurtful to the feelings of his family or other near relatives.
Explanation 2.- It may amount to defamation to make an imputation concerning a company or an association or collection of persons as such.
Explanation 3.- An imputation in the form of an alternative or expressed ironically, may amount to defamation.
Explanation 4.- No imputation is said to harm a person' s reputation, unless that imputation directly or indirectly, in the estimation of others, lowers the moral or intellectual character of that person, or lowers the character of that person in respect of his caste or of his calling, or lowers the credit of that person, or causes it to be believed that the body of that person is in a loathsome state, or in a state generally considered as disgraceful.”
Exceptions:
1) Imputation of truth in public interest for public good
2) Public conduct of public servants
3) Conduct of any person touching any public question
4) Publication of Reports of Proceedings or Courts
5) Merits of a case decided in court or conduct of witnesses and others
6) Merits of public performance
7) Censure passed in Good faith by person having lawful authority over another
8) Accusation preferred (made) in good faith to authorized person
9) Imputation made in good faith by person for protection of his or other’s interest
10) Caution intended for good

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Form 940 Internal Revenue

    • 1914 Words
    • 8 Pages

    a. Amended b. Successor employer c. No payments to employees in 2010 d. Final: Business closed or stopped paying wages…

    • 1914 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plaintiff complains that Defendant Popp falsely represented “the potential for sales from Popp’s Charlotte office,” “the quality of yarn produced by Clemson,” and “the availability of customers for Clemson Yarn.” Each of these categories, however, necessarily implies a statement of opinion, including, no doubt, a certain amount of puffery. Statements of opinion, in large part because they can be neither true nor false, are not actionable as fraudulent.…

    • 281 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bsbwor501 Final Exam

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages

    8) In which of the following situations would the court likely be closed to the public or the press…

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Bugusa Worksheet

    • 459 Words
    • 3 Pages

    was very particular to one organization, and it put a negative frame of mind to BUGusa’s…

    • 459 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    has been averted. The U.S. Senate overwhelmingly passed legislation to avert the so-called fiscal cliff on…

    • 8447 Words
    • 34 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Law 421

    • 822 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Wiretime, Inc. has committed business competition tort or interference tort. Janet has a non-compete clause in her contract with BUGusa, Inc., which is valid for additional years. Janet’s contract with BUGusa, Inc. states that she is not to work for a competitor while she is still employed with them, is fired from the company, or resigns. Wiretime, Inc. could be liable for damages because they intentionally interfered with a valid contractual relationship between Janet and BUGusa, Inc. (Zuber, 2009). Janet can also be liable for breaking her contract.…

    • 822 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    "Examples of such conduct might include offensive posts meant to intentionally harm someone's reputation." (R. 26).…

    • 1914 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Gm 520 Research Paper

    • 4631 Words
    • 19 Pages

    There are other types of intentional torts including: Defamation and slander that may pertain to publishing concerns or to information disseminated to the public about a business or an individual in an advertisement and, product disparagement is a serious tort involving the defamation of a company’s product. Innocent criticisms may be allowed, however when the disparagement causes loss of profits or ruins a company’s reputation, the harmed company can recover damages when the criticism has been committed with malice aforethought.…

    • 4631 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the article “Vandalized by Speech” by Gregory Rodriguez, he claims that hate speech is form of vandalism. He compares the subject to a broken window; if left untended, it signals people to do more damage. Rodriguez states that any discussion of the subject leads to the invocation of the 1st Amendment. He goes on to say that hate speech is a threat to our democracy and society, and it should be regulated. Additionally, Rodriguez argues that hate speech is making appearances everyone from political campaigns to college pep bands. He claims that minorities bear an extra burden when entering the public space. He also points out that negative campaigning leads to less political participation. Furthermore, Rodriguez argues that rhetorical vandalism…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    the material given is not considered an offense. for it to be considered a false statement it has to be acknowledged that it is a false statement by the accused…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Freedom of Speech: “I will respect the right of others to express themselves as guaranteed by the Constitution of the United States.” As Wikipedia describes Freedom of Speech, “Freedom of speech is the right to communicate one's opinions and ideas without fear of government retaliation or censorship.” To make it simple, you have the right to say anything that you want unless it is to excessive. To say what you want doesn’t give the right to say inappropriate things about someone, or something. Even though…

    • 876 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    -This example violates the Universal standards of Relevance and Significance. Why is the director of auxiliary services considered credible when speaking on the production of the school’s merchandise? Why is their opinion relevant? What significance does this fact have in the ultimate goal of changing the factory? To correct the problem the speaker should have gotten information from an administrator who purchases the merchandise from the textile factory, or omitted this entire statement.…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Memo

    • 408 Words
    • 2 Pages

    2. Aiken will not be successful in his claim against Dr. Jass. There needs to be three elements of defamatory: Defamatory language, of or concerning an individual, and a communicative to a third party intentionally. Although Dr. Jass was communicating to a third party and used defamatory language against homosexuality, he did not target a specific individual regarding to his study. All of these three elements need to be present in order for the language to be defamatory. Even though Aiken felt that his sexual orientation has been insulted by Dr. Jass remarks regarding by his studies of soy products, Dr. Jass was only targeting to a group of homosexuality, rather than targeting a specific. Although Dr. Jass findings sound odd and absurd, but there is no law about conducting a study on the broadcast just as long no individual is being defamed.…

    • 408 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Civil Liberties

    • 2047 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Spoken statement that refers to spoken Defamation (insult) that is malicious and is in reckless disregard of the truth…

    • 2047 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    what is crime

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages

    of a criminal case. If I slander somebody, I might be dragged into court, and I might have…

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays