Every time that we have to tackle a new project or help someone in the group we put our thoughts to find a common solution for the challenge ahead. There were not ‘wholeness” in the group, since everyone work as a team and no one works by themselves. The only issue that we had was our supervisor, this person was un-tactful, and he did not know how to talk or treat people, and basically everyone else that we asked hate his guts. Regardless, on how we all feel about him, he was the leader and everyone has to listen and follow his guidelines. Sometimes we think that we have a bad leaders, because they think different than us or we are always in disagreement. Even though, our group had issues with our supervisor we all understood that he was the brain behind the hold section. He was a very intelligent person and I personal learned a lot of things from him. One thing that the book mentions is “meetings’, we basically had a meeting every day after work sometimes very productive and some did not. According to a surveyed of American executives, 70% of meetings are frequently ineffective (Harris & Sherblom, 2011 p. 17). One great thing about our group was the “communication”, everyone was able to give ideas to resolve any issues. I characterize my co-workers as a good “decision-making and a problem solving group”, because our group brought vital information-sharing and coordinating opportunities (Harris
Every time that we have to tackle a new project or help someone in the group we put our thoughts to find a common solution for the challenge ahead. There were not ‘wholeness” in the group, since everyone work as a team and no one works by themselves. The only issue that we had was our supervisor, this person was un-tactful, and he did not know how to talk or treat people, and basically everyone else that we asked hate his guts. Regardless, on how we all feel about him, he was the leader and everyone has to listen and follow his guidelines. Sometimes we think that we have a bad leaders, because they think different than us or we are always in disagreement. Even though, our group had issues with our supervisor we all understood that he was the brain behind the hold section. He was a very intelligent person and I personal learned a lot of things from him. One thing that the book mentions is “meetings’, we basically had a meeting every day after work sometimes very productive and some did not. According to a surveyed of American executives, 70% of meetings are frequently ineffective (Harris & Sherblom, 2011 p. 17). One great thing about our group was the “communication”, everyone was able to give ideas to resolve any issues. I characterize my co-workers as a good “decision-making and a problem solving group”, because our group brought vital information-sharing and coordinating opportunities (Harris