In the TedTalk with Robin Hanson, he points out that can be cloned so long as their function is better than those of ‘normal’ people. For instance, when creating AIs, we would want the AIs to have the best ability they can possibly have. “... People who make emulations will be focused on the few best humans will be suited for this world because you can make the most money on them…” (Hanson). When we capitalize on these robots, they’re mere objects than things or humans trying to survive and provide for their family. As a person, you go to work in order to earn money and use that money to spend on food, shelter, and other necessities you may need to survive as well as provide for your own family. While robots can be considered family especially if they’re assimilated to our own lives, however, they don’t need to be fed and don’t need to be housed. Robots are machines and so, we can take their data with us anywhere we go. “Robots can travel by electronically instead of physically moving across the globe, you send their bits across a communication line, download them into something at the other end and then they’re there” (Hanson). Likewise, you can have a robot at work and …show more content…
While there are things we agree and disagree on with each other, it is safe to say that we need nature to survive. We need trees to provide us oxygen, we need reservoirs and oceans to provide us water and food, and we need the sun to give us vitamin D. Robots, on the other hand, wouldn’t care if trees were starting to disappear or if the ocean was starting to try out. They don’t need oxygen and they don’t need water to survive. They’ve been programmed a certain way and know what their function us. Moreover, as we create better AIs, those AIs would be smart enough to create even better ones and can outsmart us and even be one step ahead of us