Explain Why Some Parents Should Have The Right To Write Their Own Creative Literature

As a child, they are not very amused to reading books, and now that they are older they read many books all the time. Parents should have full control over what their children should be exposed to read. Authors should have a right to write their own creative literature for others amusement, even if it involves some inappropriate content. People even often start a conversation by talking about their favorite books. Overall, banning books disables students to think for themselves.
Firstly, parents should have full control over what their children should be exposed to read. For example, “No one tells my kids what they can’t read except me” (Konrad 3). This is significant because most parents are very concerned about other adults telling their kids what literature they can or cannot read. It is really uncalled for when another adult is telling a child what they can or cannot do, it’s not their concern to discipline a child that’s not even there’s. Also, “Kids should already
For example, “There's something called the First Amendment” (Konrad 1). The First Amendment gives people the right to do anything with their creative minds, including an author's mind. This is important because some authors don’t write books for children to read, so it is obviously going to have some unfitting content for older readers. Secondly, “These books are all icons of literature, and their value far outshines their offensive content” (Tomiak 7). This is significant because people are banning icons of literature that has inappropriate content when children are going to be exposed to it later in life. The books true value is not the inappropriate content, it is the lesson in the story the author has to the readers. In conclusion, authors should have a right to write their own creative literature, even if it involves some inappropriate