Why Banning Books Should Not Be Banned Essay
Banning books over the years has caused lot of controversy. Many people are all-for banning the indecent books, but there are some out there that think banning books is completely useless and idiotic. Books should not be banned because of its racial or sexual content. I oppose book banning for one reason. I believe that every person should have the option to read whatever they want. Many schools claim they ban books because they do not want students to act out or feel uncomfortable. Schools are afraid that their students are going to achieve the violent crimes that are mentioned in the books. In the article "Banned Books" the article states," The First Amendment of the Constitution guarantees our right to free speech...includes the right
to read and write books that might... too violent, hateful, or offensive." It does not make sense that the government would pass the amendment, but not enforce it. Great novels like "Huckleberry Finn" "The Diary of Anne Frank" "Harry Potter" and "To Kill a Mockingbird" teach important values and educate children about world problems. Unfortunately, all of these books have been banned at one time because of sexual scenes, and racial slurs. Books should not be banned because there is profanity and mention of prostitution. In the article "Banned Books" states," ...The American Library Association notes, books are usually banned 'with the best intentions-to protect... children from difficult ideas and information." Instead of of banning these books, put an age-restriction on them to prevent young, immature children from to prevent from reading them. Some of the biggest books to be banned are the one filled with information. The ones that re-tell a specific point in history. Books like "Huckleberry Finn" and " To Kill a Mockingbird" touch o the subject white supremacy. The article "Why Do Schools Ban Books" states," Some books are banned because they are thought to be racist." In "Huckleberry Finn" the racist "N" words is used. Schools want to ban these books because of the language and violence in them, but why do they feel the need to ban something that actually happened. The banning of books is completely useless for the world. Governments should not try to stop the creativity and imagination of children. Without depressing, bitter, celebratory, and informative books the world would be a very dull and controlled place.
to read and write books that might... too violent, hateful, or offensive." It does not make sense that the government would pass the amendment, but not enforce it. Great novels like "Huckleberry Finn" "The Diary of Anne Frank" "Harry Potter" and "To Kill a Mockingbird" teach important values and educate children about world problems. Unfortunately, all of these books have been banned at one time because of sexual scenes, and racial slurs. Books should not be banned because there is profanity and mention of prostitution. In the article "Banned Books" states," ...The American Library Association notes, books are usually banned 'with the best intentions-to protect... children from difficult ideas and information." Instead of of banning these books, put an age-restriction on them to prevent young, immature children from to prevent from reading them. Some of the biggest books to be banned are the one filled with information. The ones that re-tell a specific point in history. Books like "Huckleberry Finn" and " To Kill a Mockingbird" touch o the subject white supremacy. The article "Why Do Schools Ban Books" states," Some books are banned because they are thought to be racist." In "Huckleberry Finn" the racist "N" words is used. Schools want to ban these books because of the language and violence in them, but why do they feel the need to ban something that actually happened. The banning of books is completely useless for the world. Governments should not try to stop the creativity and imagination of children. Without depressing, bitter, celebratory, and informative books the world would be a very dull and controlled place.