Preview

Failure Of Appeasement Research Paper

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
937 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Failure Of Appeasement Research Paper
The outbreak of the second world war was largely due to the failure of the British policy of appeasement. Miscalculations on the part of British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain of the character of Adolf Hitler while setting the British policy was one reason for the failure in deterring the outbreak of the war. Another reason for the failure of the appeasement was the character of Hitler himself the policy would not stop his ambitious plans but just prolong them; the actions taken were only short term fixes for a long term problem. Western Europe had ideals of peace after World War 1 but Germany, Italy, and Japan had ideas of expansion no matter the cost and as a result Western Europe was not militarily prepared for another World War. The …show more content…
The anti-violent practices followed were not able to stop the outbreak of the Second world war thus showing that violent actions must have been taken to stop Hitler. “Great Britain and France, convinced that Hitler was not bluffing, decided that the only way to avoid a general European War was to accept the principle of self-determination, even for Czechoslovakia”(Snyder, 437). According to Snyder Britain and France knew that there was a very real possibility of war and in sticking to the practices of the appeasement non-violent actions were taken but even then the outbreak of the war had followed, showing that the practices of appeasement by Neville Chamberlain were not effective. This was just one example of how the British policy of appeasement failed to stop the outbreak of World War …show more content…
This caused an enlarging German military, capable enough for its country to partake in a second world war. When the appeasement was set down, Britain did not analyze what the enlarging military could be used for, and overlooked the possibility of its purpose to be used in a second world war. Partially due to the naive qualities of Chamberlain and his beliefs on another World War. This caused the wrong act in preventing Hitler's ambitions, as the British did not know the intentions of Germany when they were setting them down.

The outbreak of the Second World War was directly due to the failure of the British Policy of appeasement. Through the anti-violent terms of the policy itself, the incorrect judgement call of important individuals when negotiating other agreements such as the Munich agreement, and

the true character of Adolf Hitler did not agree with the British Policy and therefore is why it failed its

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Dbq Causes of Wwii

    • 1575 Words
    • 7 Pages

    During the period previous to World War II causes that led to World War II included German attempt of imperialism in Europe, pro-appeasement ideologies towards German military expansion, and ignoring con-appeasement ideologies towards German military expansion.…

    • 1575 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The erosion of Neville Chamberlain’s# reputation was brought about quickly as his policy of appeasement failed to prevent WW2. The Cato# collective branded him as a criminal in the ‘Guilty men’#. Churchill# further reinforced this view telling the commons “England has been offered a choice between war and shame. She has chosen shame, and will get war.”#. These more orthodox views starkly contrast the reactions of the public and media pre-war. Hailed as a hero “Most newspapers supported Chamberlain uncritically, and he received thousands of gifts, from a silver dinner service to many of his trademark umbrellas.”#, with newspapers such as the Stockholm Tidningen# suggesting he receive the Nobel peace prize, Strasbourg renaming her streets overnight and the Telegram# concluding "Your name will go down in history as a statesman who saved civilisation from destruction”#. Ultimately appeasement, “the reduction of tensions between two states by the methodical removal of the principal causes of conflict and disagreement between them, which might otherwise lead to war.”# may not have been the only realistic option, but it was certainly an option and it was taken forward. Used as a synonym for weakness and ‘giving in’ in today’s world, there are Historians who argue that Chamberlain and his policy of appeasement was weak and lead to WW2 such as L.B. Namier, while there are also historians, such as A.J.P Taylor, who argue it was the only realistic option for him, during the years 1936-38.…

    • 2327 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Another result of appeasement was Hitler gaining the support he needed as time passed. Lastly, Germany took control of Austria. The Holocaust and many other events could have been avoided if the world leaders did not choose to give in to the demands of Hitler. Even though the world leaders thought they were doing the right thing to protect their nation by standing by and doing nothing as Hitler went forth with his plans, they were actually hurting their countries even more because by choosing to appease Hitler, they allowed him to do things that would change the world…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The world was plunged into World War II in 1939 for many reasons. There were reasons such as Japan invading Manchuria, Mussolini's attack on Ethiopia, and when Hitler defies The Versailles Treaty. Appeasement was one of the biggest things that lead to WWII. It basically just postponed the War from happening. The Most effective response to aggression at this time was surely collective security. Using Appeasement got the countries no where and didn't benefit them in the least.…

    • 838 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    World War 2 Dbq Essay

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages

    World War II is the cruel, black scar that marks the back of the Twentieth century. After World War I the seeds of World War Two were planted through the unbearable burdens put on the German people from the infamous treaty of Versailles. With the rise of the notorious dictator Hitler, the German people were hungry for a new beginning. Appeasement was one of the biggest things that lead to World War II. It basically just postponed the War from happening. Leaders arose in countries that were unsatisfied with the results of the past war, World War I. Italy, Germany and Japan took action and no one was stopping them. The Most effective response to aggression at this time was surely collective security. Using Appeasement got the countries nowhere…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Causes of World War II

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Two causes of World War II were the harsh provisions of the Treaty of Versailles that ended World War I and the rise of nationalist leader Adolf Hitler.…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The First World War ended in an Allied victory, but the economies of Britain and France were shattered. In order to rebuild their economies, they had to disarm rapidly. The First World War had also given rise to strong anti-war sentiments, especially in Britain and France. Germany, who was blamed entirely for the outbreak of the First World War, received harsh reparations and was forced to sign the unfair Treaty of Versailles, which made Germany lose territory, as well as limited her armaments. This sparked resentment in the Germans who felt injustice that the war was entirely blamed on them which was prominently evident in Adolf Hitler who rose to power as Fuhrer of Germany in 1933. The highly nationalistic Nazi leader came into power a goal: to make secure and to preserve the racial community and to enlarge it. He hated the Versailles settlement and wanted to destroy it, hence fore building up the army and recovering lost territories to preserve German race. Therefore the in contrast to the Allies, Germany under Adolf Hitler was aggressive and influenced by revisionism. In attempt to preserve peace and not start a war with Germany, Britain and France, the two great powers gave in to Germany instead of standing against the aggressive Hitler. Appeasement is a term often applied to the overly acquiescent foreign policy practiced by Neville Chamberlain when dealing with Hitler’s Nazi regime. However, instead of preserving peace that Britain and France desperately wanted, it ironically allowed Hitler who did not have concrete plans on how to achieve his goals, to exploit their weakness and used situations in his advantage, which then resulted in the Second World War. While some may agree to this stand, others argue that Hitler intended a major war right from the beginning as seen from his book Mein Kampf and later on…

    • 2372 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    WW2 Prevented

    • 360 Words
    • 2 Pages

    World War II, I think, could have been prevented in two ways leading up to the war, if people realized how their actions would cause reactions. The war could have been prevented if the Treaty of Versailles wasn’t so harsh on the Germans. Without this motivation to gain back Germany’s pride and confidence, Hitler probably wouldn’t have rose to power. Even if Hitler was still angry, and looking for revenge he wouldn’t have had as many followers or as much people to support his argument. Majority of people wouldn’t be so irritated with the circumstances and wouldn’t be looking for a person to point there fingers at to blame for their issues. Also, later on in Hitler’s rise to dominating new lands, he violated several contracts, the Treat of Versailles as well as the Munich Conference. The Treaty stated that Hitler was not allowed to rebuild his army nor take over any lands, which he did both of. Along with violation of the Treaty of Versailles, Hitler signed a contracted saying he was allowed to keep the Sudetenland in compromise that he vowed not to take over the rest of Czechoslovakia or any other lands. Even though Hitler signed the contract, he took over the rest of Czechoslovakia anyway because he recognized how easy it was to gain land, and how weak the French and British looked by appeasing to him. With this being said, the League of Nation should have placed a hard punishment for violating both Treaty of Versailles and the Munich Conference, in order to prove to Hitler they were serious, and weren’t just playing around. By giving in to him easily they showed Hitler that he had the power and he was capable to do whatever he wished with it. If the French and British reacted more strictly to Hitler when he did those actions, then Hitler may have realized that they were more competition then he expected, and it would warn him not to do anything further preventing mass destruction…

    • 360 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    World War 2

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages

    World War II was a global conflict that involved many great powers. Dictators arose in countries that were dissatisfied with the results of World War II. Japan, Italy, and Germany took aggressive action and were the major axis powers. Neither the League of Nations nor democratic countries were able to stop them. The policy of appeasement was a major factor on why the axis powers made it so far in the war effort.…

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    We can even argue that the Second World War was a conflict that had merely continued from the unsettled disputes of the First World War. For example, Germany was clearly bitter from their defeat from the First World War and the ruthless settlements of the Treaty of Versailles. Because of the war, Germany was also crippled financially. In short, Germany was facing a social and political instability after the war. Although the conditions had improved under Gustav Stresemann’s leadership, the conditions further exacerbated from the Great Depression in 1929. As a result, Hitler was able to rise to power, particularly from his promises to curb unemployment and anti-Communist policies. During that point of time, the anti-Communists policies were highly appealing by capitalists alike, particularly because of Stalin’s purges and the harsh living conditions created by the Communist policies. Unsurprisingly, due to the increasing support for the Nazi party, the Weimar Republic collapsed and Hitler soon became the Fuhrer. With his given dictatorial powers in 1933, Hitler was then able to begin rearming Germany. Although France, Britain and many other countries opposed this, they were reluctant to prevent Germany from rearming itself. This is largely because they are sympathetic towards Germany’s plight and they appealed to Hitler’s anti-communist policies. Such reluctance can be seen in Britain’s policy of appeasement, the Anglo-German Naval…

    • 593 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Roll of Thunder

    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In Roll of Thunder, there are many successes of the Logan family. We see this in a lot of the characters, especially Cassie. She tends to be stubborn in her views, as is her Uncle Hammer. Her parents teacher her how to grow up with dignity and to put her pride aside so that she can endure the racism she will face. Cassie, despite her stubborn personality, learns that racism is something to fight when the time is right, and to endure when it is necessary.…

    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It all started when Britain and France started negotiating with Hitler on the matter of Czechoslovakia and whether its occupants should accept the new German rule of their land. The leader of the Nazi Party eventually convinced both Chamberlain and Daladier, representatives of England and France, respectively, that refusal to cooperate would result in certain war. With no other way out in sight, the two countries retreated, convincing the Czechs that submission was the only safe alternative. At the Munich Agreement, Britain and Germany signed a peace treaty, which resulted in Hitler’s occupation of what would soon be a dismantled Czechoslovakia. Chamberlain returned home, claiming to have secured “peace for our time”. Truthfully, he could not have been more mistaken.…

    • 667 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Undeniably Hitler’s rise to power was a major cause of WWII; however there were other contributing factors Such as the Treaty of Versailles and the British Appeasement that were equally important.…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    WWII Paper

    • 391 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Germany suffered harsh treatment and Hitler’s rise was a result of being treated wrong. Communism was rising and the British and French were very concerned about the rising of Communism. They thought that a stronger Germany would prevent the spread of Communism to the West. The Allies pushed Germans out of Africa and invaded Sicily (Kishlansky, Geary, & O’Brien, 2008). Politicians in France and Britain realized that Germany had a right to rearm and this led to the failure of appeasement.…

    • 391 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    - The British people had to want war - In 1938, public opinion was against war - so the policy of appeasement was sensible.…

    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays