Preview

Was and Appeasement a Mistake

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
300 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Was and Appeasement a Mistake
Neville Chamberlain and Adolf Hitler shook hands at the Munich Conference in 1938. This resulted in the pact, signed Sept. 29th, which recognized the German annexation of the Sudetenland in Czechoslovakia in return for a promise that there would be no further aggression. This policy of appeasement failed to prevent the outbreak of World War II.
Below there are a number of arguments. Some prove that appeasement was a mistake and some suggest that appeasement wasn’t a mistake.
Create a table with two headings - ‘A mistake’ and ‘Not a mistake’. Write each argument in the correct column.
- Germany deserved a fair deal - Germany treated too harshly at Versailles, so were only being given their rightful land.
- Germany was growing stronger - Allowed Germany to grow stronger meant it would be far more difficult to defeat.
- The British people had to want war - In 1938, public opinion was against war - so the policy of appeasement was sensible.
- Fear of another war - People wanted to avoid another terrible war and did everything possible.
- Appeasement scared the USSR - When Britain and France did not stand up to Hitler, the USSR became worried about German power - and began thinking about deals with Hitler.
- It encouraged Hitler - Giving into Hitler only made him feel he could do what he wanted - without fear of being stopped.
- Britain needed time - By giving Hitler what he wanted, Britain had more time to build up her armed forces.
- Munich Agreement was a disaster - Churchill said Czechoslovakia was sacrificed for nothing - Hitler had fooled everyone.
- Fear of Communism - It was felt better to support a strong leader of Germany rather than risk Communist takeover.
- Hitler was determined to conquer Eastern Europe - Hitler had made his plans clear - the policy of appeasement was clearly doomed from the start - Hitler just

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Churchill, a very strong opponent of appeasement, notoriously said “An appeaser is one who feeds the crocodile hoping it will eat him last”[1]. However it wasn’t till the late 1960s that official Government documents on the subject were publically released which created a new view on Chamberlain and appeasement and that it was the only realistic policy for Chamberlain and Britain to pursue.…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    On August 23, 1939, delegates from Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union met and marked the Nazi-Soviet Non-Aggression Pact (likewise called the German-Soviet Non-Aggression Pact and the Ribbentrop-Molotov Pact), which ensured that the two nations would not assault each other. By signing this pact, Germany had protected itself from having to fight a two-front war in the soon-to-begin World War II. Consequently, as a component of a mystery addendum, the Soviet Union was to be granted land, including parts of Poland and the Baltic States. The agreement was broken when Nazi Germany assaulted the Soviet Union under two years after the fact, on June 22, 1941.…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Assess the view that appeasement was the only realistic option for British policy towards Germany between 1936 and 1938…

    • 2327 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Intimidation from Fascist leaders was a factor that led to the illogical events of World War II. Adolf Hitler, chancellor of Germany, justified his barbaric actions on his attempt to benefit the "superior" German race. The effects of his ambitions were displayed during the Munich Conference in 1938. Hitler invited the Prime Minister of Britain and the Premier of France and demanded that the Sudetenland become part of Germany. Due to France and Britain's fear of another war, Hitler's demand was accepted. The appeasement, or agreement in order to maintain peace, at the Munich Conference was said to have "saved Europe from a world war," as stated by William Shirer. Contrary to Shirer, Europe would still be involved in war and things would only get worse.…

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    World War II DBQ

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the early 1920s, as World War I ended, nations looked for peace as an outlet and hope for the future. As time passed, most countries were happy that the Great War had ended, however they were upset with the outcome. Since there were many costly expenses from the war, it caused many of the hostile nations to look for strong rulers for change. This allowed many harsh dictators to rise to power. These dictators were aggressive rulers and took forceful actions. In order to combat these aggressive rulers, other nations tried to resist war and give in to their demands. This type of action was known as appeasement. Not all countries felt the same way about this response; other countries believed that a collective security would work better.…

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The world was plunged into World War II in 1939 for many reasons. There were reasons such as Japan invading Manchuria, Mussolini's attack on Ethiopia, and when Hitler defies The Versailles Treaty. Appeasement was one of the biggest things that lead to WWII. It basically just postponed the War from happening. The Most effective response to aggression at this time was surely collective security. Using Appeasement got the countries no where and didn't benefit them in the least.…

    • 838 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    France and UK came up with the policy of appeasement which was a policy with nazi germany that would allow hitler to take a lot more land than he was supposed to. The reason being is the policy was put into place so that the UK and france would let Hitler do what he wanted as long as he didnt do what they told him not to do. The policy of appeasement however did not work because Hitler was not someone you could appease. Once Hitler invaded poland the policy ended thus ending the reign of letting hitler walk all over…

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    I am going to start with how the Germans had fear of Germany becoming a communist country like Russia. At the end of the war, many people hoped that democracy would spread to most countries of the world. They did not want to be controlled by a dictatorship which would lead them into a communist country.…

    • 1205 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In addition he had the military potential to invade, so the Munich Conference (September 1938) allowed Germany to chop up Czechoslovakia so there will be no war.…

    • 366 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I believe that appeasement was the reason for the breakout of World War 2, as Hitler had violated so many rules of the Treaty of Versailles and invaded so many countries without having anyone stop him. The Policy of Appeasement failed to work, as the more land and power Hitler received, the more he wanted to get. Britain and France should have taken matter in their own hands and stopped Hitler before it was too late, rather than simply allowing him to do whatever he wanted, whenever he…

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Appeasement was the right policy for England in 1938. This is because It was based on the idea that what Hitler wanted was reasonable and, when his reasonable demands had been satisfied, he would stop. Appeasement was the only practical action that could be held during that time. England and France were not ready to get into another war. They already had severe damages that they couldn’t afford to get into another war. This gave them time to prepare for war since it is inevitable anyways. It also gave them time to prepare for old and broken equipment. Alliances needed to be made and through this, that was all possible. Also, through this policy, they were able to get public support. Appeasement also allowed Britain time to retool factories for war. Many Britons during that time saw Hitler as a defence against Russian Communism. This all happened because they thought that Hitler would soon be satisfied after remilitarizing the Rhineland, annexation of Austria and czechoslovakia. Wanted to please Hitler this way. The empire was already overstretched and its financial resources quite limited. The U.S. was isolationist. Soviet communism was feared, France was weak. This was all done to prevent war and preventing war is something needed to be done. Their objective was for the collaboration of all nations in building up a lasting peace for Europe. The Czechs, left themselves and told they were going to get no help from the Western Powers, would have been able to make better terms than they have got. This also gave the greatest chance of securing protection for the country. Czechoslovak State would’ve not been able to be an independent entity without this. Chamberlain remembered the slaughter of the…

    • 2172 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Appeasement which was done by chamberlain was to satisfy Germany for preventing war. Actually, at that time, Germany was demanding many things which it lost through Treaty of Versaille. Chamberlain who was British prime minister thought Germany was too punished and had rights to return their prohibited things, and he also thought if he did appeasement, it will make Hitler who was the leader of Germany satisfy and war won't happen. So appeasement started. Nowadays, in general, people think Chamberlain was wrong and he shouldn't do appeasement. But it isn't true. Even if appeasement failed and war started, I think appeasement was good.…

    • 675 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The representatives in the conference decided to give Hitler what he wanted. He felt that most Europeans would be happy they wouldn’t have to fight a war, though Czechoslovakia wouldn’t be happy because they had to give away their land.…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The appeasement policy was adopted by Britain and France, meaning to pacify the aggressors, like Germany and Italy, by satisfying their wants. They believed that by satisfying the aggressors’ limited wants, they could eliminate the possibility of wars. It was their mild attitude that caused the aggressive countries to start expanding their territories. In 1939, Germany invaded Poland. Britain and France finally dropped the policy as they thought they could not neglect the German invasion. Hence, the Second World War started. In fact, the appeasement policy only led the aggressors to expand their spheres of influence. It did not directly lead to war. If the policy continued, the war might not start. Therefore, the appeasement policy did not make the Second World War inevitable. It purely made the war more likely to happen.…

    • 752 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays