Preview

Did the Appeasement Policy Make the Second World War Inevitable? Essay Example

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
752 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Did the Appeasement Policy Make the Second World War Inevitable? Essay Example
The appeasement policy was adopted by Britain and France, meaning to pacify the aggressors, like Germany and Italy, by satisfying their wants. They believed that by satisfying the aggressors’ limited wants, they could eliminate the possibility of wars. It was their mild attitude that caused the aggressive countries to start expanding their territories. In 1939, Germany invaded Poland. Britain and France finally dropped the policy as they thought they could not neglect the German invasion. Hence, the Second World War started. In fact, the appeasement policy only led the aggressors to expand their spheres of influence. It did not directly lead to war. If the policy continued, the war might not start. Therefore, the appeasement policy did not make the Second World War inevitable. It purely made the war more likely to happen.

The appeasement policy made the Second World War more likely to happen as it encouraged German and Italian aggression. In 1923, Italy occupied the Greek island of Corfu. Britain and France did not intervene in the issue. Later, as Italy succeeded in occupying Corfu, Italian aggression grew stronger. In 1935, Italy invaded Abyssinia. The League of Nations condemned her action and imposed economic sanctions on Italy. However, the sanctions did not stop the US and Germany from trading with Italy. Furthermore, Britain and France did not support the sanctions. They made a plan to give two-thirds of Abyssinia to Italy to prevent her from starting war. Still, Italy did not accept the plan and conquered Abyssinia. Britain and France could do nothing but satisfy the wants of Italy. The mild attitude of Britain and France was due to the appeasement policy. It strongly stimulated German expansion.

In 1935, Germany started to rearm its army. Violating the Treaty of Versailles, Hitler introduced conscription. As Germany had withdrawn from the League of Nations, the League could not condemn the action of Germany. Yet, Britain and France also did

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Britain’s attempt to appease Mussolini were successful up until the Abyssinian crisis of 1935, as Italy were not in league with Germany but on the contrary, were opposed to German expansion and revision of the treaty of Versailles. However after the Abyssinian crisis, this stance from Mussolini disappeared and changed greatly. Hence British attempts becoming unsuccessful, as ultimately Mussolini entered the Second World War on the side of Germany.…

    • 895 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Appeasement was the British foreign policy adopted by Chamberlain in the wake of World War Two. This policy was seen as cowardice and Chamberlain received huge criticism for maintaining it throughout the road to war and died with the title of the man who was too coward to stand up to Hitler and his Nazi Germany which led to World War One.…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    These acts faced little opposition from the other European powers, who were doing everything possible to avoid another Great War. Unrepressed, Hitler finally orchestrated a phony attack by Poland, and used this excuse to declare war. This act finally forced Britain and France to fulfill their treaty obligations to Poland, and the resulting declaration of war, marked the beginning of the Second World War.…

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The world was plunged into World War II in 1939 for many reasons. There were reasons such as Japan invading Manchuria, Mussolini's attack on Ethiopia, and when Hitler defies The Versailles Treaty. Appeasement was one of the biggest things that lead to WWII. It basically just postponed the War from happening. The Most effective response to aggression at this time was surely collective security. Using Appeasement got the countries no where and didn't benefit them in the least.…

    • 838 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    World War 2 Dbq Essay

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages

    World War II is the cruel, black scar that marks the back of the Twentieth century. After World War I the seeds of World War Two were planted through the unbearable burdens put on the German people from the infamous treaty of Versailles. With the rise of the notorious dictator Hitler, the German people were hungry for a new beginning. Appeasement was one of the biggest things that lead to World War II. It basically just postponed the War from happening. Leaders arose in countries that were unsatisfied with the results of the past war, World War I. Italy, Germany and Japan took action and no one was stopping them. The Most effective response to aggression at this time was surely collective security. Using Appeasement got the countries nowhere…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    France and UK came up with the policy of appeasement which was a policy with nazi germany that would allow hitler to take a lot more land than he was supposed to. The reason being is the policy was put into place so that the UK and france would let Hitler do what he wanted as long as he didnt do what they told him not to do. The policy of appeasement however did not work because Hitler was not someone you could appease. Once Hitler invaded poland the policy ended thus ending the reign of letting hitler walk all over…

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    After World War I created instability with in Europe the stage was being set for another world war that would follow a mere two decades later. Germany was both unstable politically and economically and with the help of Hitler they were determined to get back on their feet. Hitler began rearming the country and signed strategic treaties with Italy and Japan in order to gain more ground on his goal of world domination. Hitler invaded Poland in September of 1939 and as a result Great Britain and France were inclined to declared war on Germany. World War II…

    • 2536 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hitlers Tactics

    • 316 Words
    • 1 Page

    Besides that, personal appeals were also one put into practise by Hitler. In 1935 he abandoned the Versailles Treaty and began to build up the army by conscripting five times its…

    • 316 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    I believe that appeasement was the reason for the breakout of World War 2, as Hitler had violated so many rules of the Treaty of Versailles and invaded so many countries without having anyone stop him. The Policy of Appeasement failed to work, as the more land and power Hitler received, the more he wanted to get. Britain and France should have taken matter in their own hands and stopped Hitler before it was too late, rather than simply allowing him to do whatever he wanted, whenever he…

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Abby McGuire Ms Burke World History May 23, 2024. Why Appeasement was the Right Policy in Response to Germany? The interwar period was one of the most fragile times in Europe as the nation grappled with the effects of World War I and the chaos from the Great Depression. As a new power formed in Germany with the name of Adolf Hitler, the Allied Powers had to decide whether to keep peace or resume the conflict between regions.…

    • 1301 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Appeasement was the right policy for England in 1938. This is because It was based on the idea that what Hitler wanted was reasonable and, when his reasonable demands had been satisfied, he would stop. Appeasement was the only practical action that could be held during that time. England and France were not ready to get into another war. They already had severe damages that they couldn’t afford to get into another war. This gave them time to prepare for war since it is inevitable anyways. It also gave them time to prepare for old and broken equipment. Alliances needed to be made and through this, that was all possible. Also, through this policy, they were able to get public support. Appeasement also allowed Britain time to retool factories for war. Many Britons during that time saw Hitler as a defence against Russian Communism. This all happened because they thought that Hitler would soon be satisfied after remilitarizing the Rhineland, annexation of Austria and czechoslovakia. Wanted to please Hitler this way. The empire was already overstretched and its financial resources quite limited. The U.S. was isolationist. Soviet communism was feared, France was weak. This was all done to prevent war and preventing war is something needed to be done. Their objective was for the collaboration of all nations in building up a lasting peace for Europe. The Czechs, left themselves and told they were going to get no help from the Western Powers, would have been able to make better terms than they have got. This also gave the greatest chance of securing protection for the country. Czechoslovak State would’ve not been able to be an independent entity without this. Chamberlain remembered the slaughter of the…

    • 2172 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    A temporary truce that allows a person to received what’s requested, before an even greater conflict emerged. Issuing appeasement to Germany multiple times, it was considered useless. Since Adolf Hitler, would still invade countries among it border, even though he’s only allowed to have a portion of it. Meaning, that Appeasement was only an excuse to escape conflict with the German. And is only a cowardly move, which resulted to a war in 1937.…

    • 731 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why Did Germany Lose Ww2

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages

    It was 1939, and Germany was becoming a threat, breaking the Treaty of Versailles which did not allow them to build an army, but under Hitler they were building an army and had mad ideas. As it started gaining back land from which they lost in World War 1, neighbouring countries became alert of its aggressiveness. It was given the little land it wanted in hope that it would back down from other countries. But as how Winston Churchill anticipated, it did not. Germany began conquering nearby countries like Poland.…

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    - The British people had to want war - In 1938, public opinion was against war - so the policy of appeasement was sensible.…

    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    A factor of why the appeasement may be justified was the growing concern for the British Empire. The most powerful dominions in the Empire, such as Canada, Australia, New Zealand and South Africa, all greatly supported and favored appeasement. If appeasement was not to be made, these self-governed ‘dominions' would not support Britain if war would come to Czechoslovakia. And on September 1st, 1938, this news became official and Chamberlain was told that the South African and Australian governments would not help Britain if war would break out. It became clear and apparent that an aggressive approach to Germany would split the empire. And in fact, British military leaders supported the idea of appeasement because they were terrified of fighting multiple countries at once (Italy, Germany, Japan). All of this information made it clear that almost everyone favored an appeasement over any kind of war. Many people now would criticize this as people believe that appeasement is an act of weakness, with no self resolve. And with Hitler on the rise to power, he may have looked upon this as an…

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays