Preview

Federalist Papers: The Autobiography Of Alexander Hamilton

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
578 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Federalist Papers: The Autobiography Of Alexander Hamilton
In Paper #1 of the Federalist Papers, Alexander Hamilton calls on the American public to engage in a process of “reflection and choice”. By this, he means that he would like to see Americans foster political reflection in a public sphere. The face-to-face debate clubs and small-scale pamphleteering described by Benjamin Franklin in The Autobiography of Benjamin Franklin is much more effective at promoting political reflection in the public sphere than the current mass media. The small-scale efforts were more effective because they encouraged personal debates. The mass media on the other hand, can tend to digress from the important issues and not delve enough into the political spectrum.
The debate clubs and pamphleteering that Benjamin Franklin described were effective due to the fact that they made an influence on everyone involved. The debate clubs were made to spark intense person to person debates. These discussions weren’t made for the sake of winning, but for the sake of compromise. Instead of arguing to a point, a consensus was made. Due to this personal involvement, anyone involved had the opportunity to make a political impact. One downside of these clubs was that the rich,
…show more content…
Due to the fact that mass media is in the business for profit, the stories they put out are sensational. Articles and headlines are usually presented as conflicts, and with flashy titles containing some sort of wordplay, such as “Terror on the Tarmac” , the current front page headline of the New York Daily News. On the other hand, the first story about the combat process in Iraq is on page 17 . The main objective for these newspapers is to turn a profit, and that is achieved by moving the most units. The best way to move units is by drawing customers in with exciting headlines, even if they’re not the most relevant

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In the Federalist No. 72, Alexander Hamilton states that re-eligibility should be ensured in order to prevent an executive from extending his term in office unconstitutionally. Hamilton presents five effects that would occur if a president would only be allowed to serve for a single term. Some of the effects that Hamilton presented are, a reduction in the president’s motivation to be on his best behavior since he would not be concerned about getting re-elected. Another issue that would result if re-eligibility would be denied is that if a president who holds office is obsessed with wealth he might get involved in corruption since he would soon be prohibited from office. The author’s purpose is to establish re-eligibility in order for an executive…

    • 248 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Every other founding father's story gets told, every other founding father gets to grow old yet Alexander Hamilton doesn’t get enough credit for all the credit he gave our nation. Alexander Hamilton deserves the legacy he always longed for.Hamilton had a difficult childhood in the Caribbean, his father left when he was only ten. This left Hamilton and his mother in destitution.Two years later Hamilton and his mother fell ill and tragically his mother passed away leaving him an orphan. Alexander knew he had to educate himself and rise up or else he would live a transient life in despair. To escape the impecunious conditions he wrote a book collection and with the income he garnered he purchased a ticket for a ship that was headed to New…

    • 898 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the first Federalist paper, No. 10 written by James Madison, is an informative piece of writing warning us against the dangers of having such a strong, powerful government and what ways that we can break away from the “Violent Factions”. (Paragraph 1, Line 3.) As Madison goes on, he goes into great detail on the two ways of defeating the creation of factions. One would be to get rid of liberty and freedom all together, which is impossible to complete. The second way to get ride of the factions would be “by giving to every citizen the same opinions, the same passions, and the same interests.” (Paragraph 4, line 2.) Both of those methods are equally unwise as it is impossible to complete. As it is hardwired into…

    • 388 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the “Federalist No. 15” Alexander Hamilton is pointing out the deficiencies of the existing confederation. He initiates his discussion by stating that the Articles of Confederation have been constructed under a faulty foundation that have worsen due to fallacious arguments and the lack of unionship. Hamilton realizes that the defects of the national government have been pushed aside far too long and have not been addressed properly. His purpose in the article is to pinpoint the leakage and rebuild the structure of the government with “felicity and prosperity” (7), whereas the existing confederate system has been patching up their errors in hopes the citizens do not notice. Hamilton thrives to unite the states by building on the idea of the creation of a…

    • 630 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    *Hamilton suggested Congress consider ways to “render the constitution of the federal government adequate to the experiences of the union”…

    • 1246 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The conflict between the Antifedralists and the Federalists had a tremendous impact on our country. The Federalists, led by Hamilton, represented the urban mercantile interests of the seaports. The Antifedralists, led by Jefferson, spoke for the rural and southern interests. The central government and its power was mainly what separated the two parties. The federalists favored how things had been formerly, while the Antifederalists advocating states rights. I see the Antifederalists’ approach being best for America’s problems and being able to more clearly see the future of America.…

    • 485 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    People who prefered ratifaction and Hamilton’s economic concept were called Federalists. These people tended to be farmers, lawyers, and well established strong political leaders. Their outlook was more of a fixed hierarchy and a public…

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the election of 1796 two parties emerged. The Federalist who were formed by Hamilton and his associates to promote shared political ideas who believed in a strong centralized government and felt the Constitution was open for interpretation. The Democratic Republican party who Thomas Jefferson and James Madison lead and believed in state rights, strict interpretation of the Constitution, and limited government. After looking at both sides I believe Hamilton and the Federalist is the best side. The Federalist seem to want all the states to pitch in together with things such as debt, creating a national bank, etc.…

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    If you were to paint a portrait of the Founding Father 's from the average American 's mind, the final result would depict a group of heroic men marching into battle, defeating the dastardly British, and writing the Constitution all in one sitting. Everything would be tinted with rosy hues of red, white, and blue, and patriotic music sounds in the background…right?…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    For James Madison it was vital that all members of society had a say in choosing representatives this idea led to his disagreement surrounding the fiscal plan of Alexander Hamilton. Hamilton proposed several ideas to pay off the huge national debt that had accumulated over the past years, but his plan would involve a class of people who would become extremely wealthy and would help the government to finance large undertakings. Madison expressed concern that this plan would cause a dramatic increase not only in factions, but also in the overwhelming power of the wealthy faction to control the governments decisions. Madison supported “the formation of an enlightened public voice that would control and direct the measures of government.” Madison argued that a better plan for the country would be to allow the public to have the largest role in forming the…

    • 1153 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    However Jefferson had supported the average man unlike Hamilton who excluded the poor in his plans for the government and economy. Another example would be that Hamilton’s plan could become corrupted from the chosen few to become greedy and lead into tyranny. Jefferson had instead believed in divided power and in a weaker central government as he feared for a strong central government to take away liberty. The people participating in the federal government could be tempted to serve themselves rather than the people. Jefferson believed in the common people, calling them the “chosen people of God” (8). However Hamilton trusted only the rich and educated to partake in the government which would result with where the “poor would become poorer”…

    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cited: Ginsberg, Benjamin, Theodore J. Lowi, and Margeret Weir. We The People: An Introdunction to American Politics. Ed. Fifth. W.W. Norton & Company, Inc. 2005.…

    • 673 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the Revolutionary- Federalist Era, politics, parties, programs, policies, and people made an enormous difference in how the new nation should be structured and run. During this era, two men in particular championed politics and their respective parties. These two men were Alexander Hamilton, a Federalist, and Thomas Jefferson, a Democratic-Republican. Both Hamilton and Jefferson were successful college educated intellectuals and politicians who made significant contributions to the development of the United States policies and programs. However Hamilton, despite never being elected President, had more influence over the development of the United States’ policies and programs during the Revolutionary-Federalist Era. Historically Hamilton and Jefferson are known for agreeing to disagree over just about every policy being discussed during the establishment of government structure, and decorum. And it is Hamilton’s policies on economics, government structure, and constitution interpretation, which took precedent over Jefferson’s.…

    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hamiltonian Federalism- Alexander Hamilton wanted to form a strong union with the states and federal government. He sought an increase in the power/control of the federal government over the individual states. Hamilton also wanted a bank of the State so that loans could be put out to manufacturers and commercial enterprises. He felt like it was necessary to create a large national debt so that the government's credit would be built up over time. Finally, he wanted to place/raise tariffs on foreign goods to promote American manufacturing and the affordability of the products.…

    • 248 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Almost a decade later, nearing the end of the Reconstruction Era, the division between the two political parties was ever more greatly divided. Prior to the Civil War, slavery was a huge opposition for the two major parties. Following the succession of the South from the Union led the country into battle. After the south was defeated, new amendments added to the Constitution created both victory in the North and turmoil in the South. The control of the government to be able to enact amendments limiting the powers of the states divided the people even more. I believe, however, from the view of the governmental standpoint, Hamilton's views were closely related to the abilities given to the government at this time. The reality of the issue is that even those that opposed didn't have the ability to fight such a strong authority. The government had become ran by political leaders that wasn't in support for the common man's ideas, and were largely made up of highly educated political personnel. The government had adapted polices of a banking system, loose interpretation of the Constitution, and limited states’ rights. All in which was widely the view of…

    • 667 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays