Federalists: Compare And Contrast Essay

The Constitution of the United States is what many people consider the back bone of our nation. It was written in a time of need, when the federal government could not lead the country to the promise of a truly developed nation. Now, in 2016, 227 years later, this document still stands and makes sure our government does its job correctly and efficiently for the persons in their country. Although the Constitution became official, this did not happen without the compromise of the Federalists and the Anti-federalists. These two sides had their say, yet they came to terms and both acquired what they wanted in the Constitution. Before 1789, there became two main political groups in the country. The Federalists, and the Anti-Federalists. The Federalists, had a good amount of members, including three who wrote the famous Federalist Papers, which were a series of essays that advocated the ratification of the Constitution, James Madison, John Jay, and Alexander Hamilton. These men believed in a strong central government, hence the name Federalists,
was the Anti-Federalists. They of course were opposed to the Federalists on how they viewed how the government should be conducted. These men, Mercy Otis Warren, Richard Henry Lee, Samuel Adams, among many others, drafted their own works which made up the Anti-Federalists papers. The Anti-Federalists party was based on the fact that the central government should not be very strong and that more power should reside to the states. Their main cause of this thinking was because they believed that if the country gave too much power to the federal government, it would become too powerful and they would end up where they started before the Revolutionary War, the government in control of everything and the people not having a say about any of it. The main reason the Anti-Federalists were tolerant of the passing of the Constitution was because they were able to have a bill of rights put into