certain books should not be banned about the material, content and issues because this could teach the youth about situations and topics they give them a better understanding. For instance, people fell that it breaks the first amendment and that they have the right to read whatever they want to read. “While many are targeted by social conservatives, who feel the books contain sexual or religious content inappropriate for children, others are targeted for containing unpopular political viewpoints.” (US stills bans, suppresses books despite the first amendment) Not only have we wanted to target book toward books that have sexual content but political ideas. We don’t kids getting misunderstood by political ideas that they think threaten them. Not only though people think content is good for youth to understand so have had they had a better understanding of different topics. “Often challenges are motivated by a desire to protect children from “inappropriate” sexual content or “offensive” language.” (About Banned and Challenged Books) Here this explains how people want to protect kids from dangerous topics. This could keep kids from topics that they aren’t mature enough from. Certain books should be banned because of inappropriate material and issues youth don’t understand. For example, many books challenge inappropriate material and different viewpoints of religion. They have shown bad material that is not appropriate and can really mess up kids. On the website “School and Censorship, Banned Books” they show statics on different challenges authors put in their books For example 1,607 were challenges to "sexually explicit" material and 1,256 were challenges to material considered nonage-appropriate or "unsuited to age group". Many books like these challenge areas that kids don’t understand. For instance, many books out in the world contain material that would soon pass in are life. We go through life and learn things we would learn from the banned books at the right times. Reading some books like that could pretty much speed up this process and not view it rightly. On the website “School and Censorship, Banned Books” it states “But the greatest threat today comes from the fundamentalist right, with its ideological hostility to other religious or philosophical systems, to homosexuality, to sex education, and indeed to the basic idea of secular education." Moreover, this explains how banning books can keep this material out of the system. In conclusion, certain books should be banned because of inappropriate material and issues youth don’t understand. Different topics can’t be understood by different generations and we can’t figure out they really process what they read in banned books is right or wrong. But that’s why we need to learn and take a look at what children and teens are reading. Maybe we should look to what children are reading.
certain books should not be banned about the material, content and issues because this could teach the youth about situations and topics they give them a better understanding. For instance, people fell that it breaks the first amendment and that they have the right to read whatever they want to read. “While many are targeted by social conservatives, who feel the books contain sexual or religious content inappropriate for children, others are targeted for containing unpopular political viewpoints.” (US stills bans, suppresses books despite the first amendment) Not only have we wanted to target book toward books that have sexual content but political ideas. We don’t kids getting misunderstood by political ideas that they think threaten them. Not only though people think content is good for youth to understand so have had they had a better understanding of different topics. “Often challenges are motivated by a desire to protect children from “inappropriate” sexual content or “offensive” language.” (About Banned and Challenged Books) Here this explains how people want to protect kids from dangerous topics. This could keep kids from topics that they aren’t mature enough from. Certain books should be banned because of inappropriate material and issues youth don’t understand. For example, many books challenge inappropriate material and different viewpoints of religion. They have shown bad material that is not appropriate and can really mess up kids. On the website “School and Censorship, Banned Books” they show statics on different challenges authors put in their books For example 1,607 were challenges to "sexually explicit" material and 1,256 were challenges to material considered nonage-appropriate or "unsuited to age group". Many books like these challenge areas that kids don’t understand. For instance, many books out in the world contain material that would soon pass in are life. We go through life and learn things we would learn from the banned books at the right times. Reading some books like that could pretty much speed up this process and not view it rightly. On the website “School and Censorship, Banned Books” it states “But the greatest threat today comes from the fundamentalist right, with its ideological hostility to other religious or philosophical systems, to homosexuality, to sex education, and indeed to the basic idea of secular education." Moreover, this explains how banning books can keep this material out of the system. In conclusion, certain books should be banned because of inappropriate material and issues youth don’t understand. Different topics can’t be understood by different generations and we can’t figure out they really process what they read in banned books is right or wrong. But that’s why we need to learn and take a look at what children and teens are reading. Maybe we should look to what children are reading.