Mass-media has always been an important part of the cultural analysis. And films, as one of the most important aspect of the mass-media, have very much influence both on the shaping of the culture and also on the reflection of culture. It is really difficult to make the exact definition of culture but briefly it can be said that culture is the everything that surrounds people; how they are grown up, how they wear, how they think on exact topics etc. And movies can be very effective on the people of a culture that they can both impose different ideas to people and change the mindset of people and also be very critical about the culture. David Fincher's movie Fight Club can be considered …show more content…
as a film that reflects the American consumer society, the power of mass-media and the representations of masculinity all of which can be examined through Lacan's "Mirror Theory" and misrecognition, construction of identity within culture/popular culture and the masculinity within society with references to Stuart Hall's "Encoding, Decoding" and Jean Baudrillard "The Finest Consumer Object: The Body".
Lacan's theory of "Mirror Stage" is about the young child's identification with his own image and it is a stage that occurs anywhere from 6-18 months of age. Mirror Stage concerns the ability of an infant to recognize its own image in mirror, before it is able to speak or have control over its motor skills. The child of that period has not yet mastered its own body and can not control its own movements. It does not see its body as a whole but as fragmented and therefore sees its hand, for instance, and cannot think that it is its hand, the hand could beong to anyone or noone. In the "Mirror Stage" the baby begins to anticipate being whole because it looks the real other as well and sees it as a whole and there occurs a sense of self that the child sees that it looks like what others look like. And in Fight Club, any audience who knows about the Lacan's theory can …show more content…
easily catch the idea that Tyler is the person whom the narrator sees on the mirror. In other words, Tyler is the misrecognition of the narrator. Like the child who sees handsome, beautiful, people who represent the ideal image on Tv and thinks that the beautiful girl is her, Tyler is also the ideal for the narrator. The narrator who creates the ideal-Tyler- sees him as another person in the beginning but later on realizes that he is the misrecognition, he is the one who he wants to be. When looked from Baudrillard's perspective, the reason of Tyler's becoming the ideal is his body. He seems more fit and more handsome than the narrator and seems more strong, and becomes the ideal for the narrator: "[ ] if you don't make your bodily devotions, if you sin by omission, you will be punished. Everything that ails you comes from being culpubly irresposible towards yourself (your own salvation)"(130). As a result, it can be said that Fight Club can be shown as an example to Lacan's "Mirror Stage " in terms of misrecognition that Tyler becomes the misrecognition of the narrator because Tyler is more powerful and handsome when compared to the narrator.
Fight Club is considered as a criticism of the American consumer society. This can be examplified from the very beginning of the film that when the narrator is showed in his house while chosing some goods from a magazine advertisement. And this shows the power of the advertisements that advertisements shape the ideas of people.
He chooses the things from the advertisement even without seeing them really. And as the narrator tells us the story here, he thinks that he should buy a dinner unit but the question is that by which his identity is reflected. And it is understood that the identity of people is shaped by the possessions they have. He is not asking what personal characteristics and attributes define him but what possessions. Therefore it can be said the sense of identity is a product of social and cultural factors. There are many examples of this in the film. The narrator talks about little saops for only one use, little shampoos for only one use, sugar and coffe for only one use etc. And he tries to imply the power of the consumerism that everybody in the society are effected by the consumer culture. Producers not only use possessions to be consumed but also as examined in the article of Baudrillard, they use body as a consumer object, as. When Tyler and the narrator are in subway, they realize an advertisement of Gucci. This is an underwear advetisement on which there is a fit and muscular man whose face is not seen. And as looking at the advertisement the narrator asks to Tyler that is this what a man is supposed to look like. This shows the extent of consumerism controlling the life. The consumer culture even defines how the modern male should look and how he should wish to look. As Baudrillard says in his
article:
This homology between bodies and objects takes us into the deep mechanism of managed consumption. If the rediscovery of the body' is always the rediscovery of the body/object in the generalized context of other objects, one can see how easy, logical and necessary a transition there is from the functional appropriation of the body to the appropriation of goods and objects in shopping. (134)