According to Goldman at no certain point can sex between sober, consenting and mature individuals be sexual immorality. His views differ sharply with those of Finnis. Finnis observes that homosexuality and masturbation are acts of sexual immorality. He states that the worthlessness of masturbation and disintegration of oneself do not lead to self-actualizing and experiencing the real good of marriage. He emphasizes that marriage is for procreation and for friendship. By stating that marriage is for procreation is clear evidence that he is against homosexuality. On the other hand, Scruton states that sex is only permissible when there are intimacy and love. Finally, Roman Catholic Church is normally against some sexual behaviors, the church is against homosexuality, masturbation and many other forms of sexual behavior which it terms as sexually immoral. …show more content…
For instance, he observes that marriage has double blessings i.e. friendship and procreation. Also, he says that the reproductive organ of wife and husband unites them biologically. On the issue of homosexuality, he portrays it as a casual physical satisfaction and active use of another human being for one’s own gratification. By this, he is trying to show that homosexuality marriages are full of selfishness and partners manipulate one another. Moving to the issue of sex for the pleasure, he states that one’s body is used as an instrument for securing of the experimental of the conscious self. He concludes by saying that the worthlessness of the gratification does not help one to actualize and experience the real common