Preview

first past the post

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
579 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
first past the post
The United Kingdom’s electoral system is the single-member district plurality voting system. It is part of the British political culture and consequently predominately used in the UK as well as former British colonies, e.g. the United States, Canada, Nigeria, and India (Electoral-Reforms.org.uk, n.d.). However, throughout the past decades, criticism of the system especially in the United Kingdom has become more substantial and focused. The plurality system is considered an effective and simple voting system, which results in a stable government (Bale, 2008, p.169). However, it can be argued that it does not fairly represent the electorate’s diversified political opinions. A more accurate display of political diversity in the legislature is achieved by proportional representation (Gottfried and Lodge, 2011). It is a more representative voting system that allows for consensus politics to take place and favours coalition governments. Critics might question the stability of a coalition government; however, an introduction of a PR voting system would result in a fairer representation of the British electorate’s political views in the legislature.

Britain’s current electoral system is known as the plurality or first-past-the-post system. A single-member district plurality voting system is used to elect members of parliament. Parties can chose one candidate for each constituency and voters are allowed to cast one single vote on one candidate (Gottfried and Lodge, 2011). The candidate who receives the plurality; the majority of the votes, is elected for the constituency. However, the elected Member of Parliament does not have to gain a total majority of over 50%, he or she just has to have more votes than the candidate with the next-highest amount of votes (Bale, 2008, p.169). The party with an absolute majority, or if that is not the case, the party with the most seats in Parliament, is assumed to form the government.

The first-past-the-post electoral system

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Proportionality is a key factor in assessing the fairness of a voting system, if a parties number of votes is not equal or close to their number of seats in parliament then the voters’ are being misrepresented. AMS is a PR system, which results in a party’s percentage of votes being more in line with the number of seats they win in parliament. The list MSPs ‘top up’ the constituency MSPs to make the overall result within a region approximately in line with the wishes of the electorate. In the 2011 Scottish Parliamentary elections Labour received 3 ‘top up’ MSPs to better reflect its level of support across the North East region as it received 44,000 in the 2nd vote. This shows that AMS allows for good representation in Parliament for voters. However, FPTP does not allow this same proportionality in Parliament, and in turn less representation of the electorate’s views as a whole. FPTP produces a disproportionate result. The two main parties have concentrated support in certain areas so win constituencies and seats. Smaller parties such as the Green Party and UKIP, with less concentrated support than Labour and the Conservatives, lose out under FPTP. For example, in 2005 Labour received 36% of the vote but 55% of the seats. The Lib Dems only received 10% of the seats with 22% of the vote. This shows AMS is more responsive to the will of the people as the composition of parliament will more closely represent the wishes of the electorate as it has an element of proportionality unlike…

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The current system under the Westminster elections is first-past-the-post. This is a majoritarial system in that winner-takes-all. Those who are in favour of PR argue that the FPTP system is under-representative towards minor parties and votes are then typically ‘wasted’. However those who are in favour of the FPTP system point out that it leads to a strong government, a clear outcome and keeps extremist at bay. Proportional representation is a institution of different electoral systems that produces a government based on the votes of the electorate and is proportion to the seats that the party receives. This system is different to the current Westminster formula in that the percentage of votes gained is the same as the percentage of seats received.…

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the House of Commons there are many parties all fighting individually for control of the house, and to be in power and govern the land of the UK. To win the election and do this a party or coalition of parties needs a 326 majority to be able to form a government. This system creates a dominance in the house of commons if that majority is achieved sufficiently, as with Tony Blair’s landslide in 1997 where he had over a 150 seat majority, it is this kind of one party dominance I am going to be discussing in this essay and whether or not it limits parliaments main function to represent constituents and pass laws which benefit them.…

    • 1009 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Module 13 Vocabulary

    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages

    19. Proportional representation- The most popular electoral system alternative to a “winner take all” kind of election, this is when there has to be a strong relation between the amount of votes a party has and the amount of parliamentary seats a party wins in order for them to take office.…

    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Assignment 2 2014 2015

    • 480 Words
    • 3 Pages

    M2 – Compare the electoral processes used at different levels of government in the UK.…

    • 480 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Legal Studies Notes

    • 37517 Words
    • 151 Pages

    Each electorate votes for a representative for Parliament, who must obtain to majority of votes in that electorate.…

    • 37517 Words
    • 151 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Additional Member System

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages

    There are two main electoral systems to discuss, first is the AMS (Additional Member System) and second is FPTP (First-Past-The-Post System). In general, there has been a view that considers AMS as the greater choice as an electoral system. The first point is, AMS is more responsible to the will of the people due to its hybrid system. A proportion of seats in the legislative assembly are elected using FPTP while a small number of representatives—additional member—are elected in multi-member constituencies. For example, in the 2011 Scottish Parliamentary elections, 56 members of the Scottish Parliament (43%) and 20 members of the Welsh Assembly (33%) are elected in this way1.…

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fptp Pros And Cons

    • 1397 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The current ‘First Past the Post (FPTP)’ system within Canada has many benefits, as it allows the government to pass bills with ease, if they have a majority government (majority of seats); however, a majority of Canadian citizens each election are disappointed with the result, and/or feel like their vote did not matter. The reason behind all the concern within Canada post election is that the seats needed to make a majority, can be acquired without having a majority of the populace within the riding. Am example of this is in the 2011 election, Stephen Harper of the Conservatives, won the General election with only 39% of the total votes cast . The FPTP system has favored the Conservatives, and the Liberals, allowing them to have monopolized the Canadian elections in the past hundred years . There are numerous alternatives to FPTP, including: ranked ballots, and proportional representation (PR). Canada is quite possibly overdue for a reform of the political election system; however, jumping to proportional representation isn’t necessarily the best choice. Changes can be made to the current political system, while they research electoral reform alternatives, such as: mandatory…

    • 1397 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    How democratic is the UK

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages

    It can be argued that Britain is both democratic and undemocratic; this can be shown via a range of issues relating to British politics and the society in which we live. The generally accepted definition of a democracy is a form of government in which the major decisions of government and the direction of policy behind these decisions - rests directly or indirectly on the freely given consent of the freely given consent of the freely majority of the adults government. There are two forms of democracy but the UK is run through an indirect or representative democracy as opposed to a direct democracy, which relies on referendums and would be difficult in a large, modern society. Furthermore, the UK is a parliamentary democracy, the government and representatives are intermingled meaning that the UK does not have separation of powers, meaning that the executive, legislative and judicial courts all work together unlike the American Presidential system which could create a lack in communication. In this essay, I propose to argue both for and against and eventually come to a conclusion whether the UK is democratic or not and give a comparison between the UK and the US in terms of democracy.…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A referendum is supposed to be enhancing democracy in the UK however they undermine our system of representative democracy, where candidates are elected to make decisions on behalf of their constituency. These candidates have a good understanding of politics and are elected to make decisions with the constituent’s best interests in heart. They are used, as most people in the UK do not have the political knowledge and understanding to make these important decisions. They are less likely to have access to key arguments and information than elected, full-time politicians. Furthermore in seeking a majority vote, referendums may undermine the rights of the minorities that are generally well protected by constitutions and judiciaries within representative democracies. They are detraction in a representative system of democracy and as such they surrender power of experts to the masses.…

    • 1040 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Majority Government : When one party wins at least half the seats, plus one, in the House of…

    • 2057 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Despite its flaws the ‘First past the post’ electoral systems for general elections suits Great Britain”…

    • 1268 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In other words, the votes of some are 15 times more powerful than the votes of others. Loenen makes note that the purpose (of the right to vote) cannot be less than to guarantee to citizens their full democratic rights in the government of the country and the provinces” (Loenen, 1997). He also mentions that such a fundamental right must not be diluted for some citizens by giving greater weight to the vote of others (Loenen, 1997). The court seems to be unaware that plurality electoral system regularly produces majority governments from a minority of the…

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Voting has played a key role when it comes to speaking up for the well-being of society in the UK and because of this, citizens have not only fought for their voting rights, but also emerged others regarding significance of voting; however, the voter's ratio has been declined as per previous year.…

    • 52 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Firstly, it could be argued that the more proportional electoral systems are the closest to a 'perfect' electoral system because they show what/who the people of the UK really voted for. One proportional system is the Single Transferrable Vote. This system operates by representatives being elected in large multi-member constituencies, the voting is preferential and also known as 'Voting Ordinal' where the voters can vote as many times as they want. The candidates much receive a quota known as a droop quota to actually become elected and if they reach this quota any excess votes are redistributed on the basis of 2nd preferences. The calculation used to work out the quota is (total valid poll/(seats+1))+1, which some people argue is too complicated for any elections in the UK, if no candidate reaches the quota then the lowest places candidate is eliminated and the second preferences of the people that voted for them are redistributed. This system is used successfully in many UK elections, it's used in Northern Ireland for elections such as in the Assembly, for local government elections and EU parliament elections. The Republic of Ireland and Scotland both use it for Local Elections.…

    • 2195 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays