Preview

Flag Burning & Freedom of Speech

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
679 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Flag Burning & Freedom of Speech
Flag Burning & Freedom of Speech

Jonathan Cunningham

International Academy of Design & Technology Online

Since the Supreme Court has decided that freedom of speech may at times be restricted, the question arises, should such freedom be restricted when it comes to flag burning? An example of such an action would be an angry mob of people who wish to protest a recent decision by the government by burning the flag. Some people state that the government should ban this form of protest. Others staunchly insist this form of expression should not be outlawed. This freedom should not be restricted.

Matt Nagin (2012), a writer for the online news platform policymic, states that “opponents of flag burning speak about it as if the protesters were destroying the national character and/or desecrating the one and only Mona Lisa”. Many citizens quite understandably take offense at the thought or mention of burning the flag. This may at times be especially true with individuals who have served in the military, or their family members; since they can personally attest to the cost of defending freedom or the safety of a nation, flag burning can be especially hurtful or offensive.

In spite of this, the freedom to protest via burning of the flag is protected by law. The most recent occurrence of when the Supreme Court had to re-establish this was in 1989, in the case of Texas vs. Johnson. According to an article posted online by a website known as the Law Library, Gregory Lee Johnson had been convicted of “desecrating a venerated object in violation of Texas Penal Code section 42.09(a) (3)”. He had been given a fine of two thousand dollars and a sentence of a year in prison. Fortunately, his conviction was reversed by the Supreme Court. That same article went on to say, “The Free Speech Clause, the court ruled, forbids the government from establishing an orthodox symbol of national unity that is insulated from public criticism, symbolic or otherwise”.

So



References: Nagin, Matt. (2012, October). Flag Burning is a Freedom That We Must Respect. policymic. Retrieved from http://www.policymic.com/articles/15574/flag-burning-is-a-freedom-that-we-must-respect Law Library - American Law and Legal Information. (2012). Texas v. Johnson. Retrieved from the online Law Library <ahref="http://law.jrank.org/pages/10758/Texas-v-Johnson.html">Texas v. Johnson</a> Upshaw, Ed Earl. (October, 2012). Discussion of “Flag Burning is a Freedom That We Must Respect” article. [Flag burning in a public protest is a deliberate attempt to provoke a reaction…When it is successful, why hold the provoked person responsible...The 1st Amendment guarantees freedom of speech, but it doesn 't guarantee freedom from foreseeable consequences]. Retrieved from: http://www.policymic.com/articles/15574/flag-burning-is-a-freedom-that-we-must-respect

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    So it's common that they surmise that desecrating the flag by setting it ablaze isn't right. Basically, they imagine that they are wearing the flag on their garments and slapping it on guard stickers all over the place is correct. Be that as it may, the legislature acts as though they have better things to do than to toss us behind bars for wearing Old Navy T-shirts or tossing out our patriotic paper plates and mugs after a fourth of July party or utilizing our flag stamped bathroom tissue. Should the legislature care more about what has been done to our national symbol? I think so. Screenwriter Aaron Sorkin of The American President movie and each one of those individuals who trust that setting the flag on fire is secured by the right to speak freely are correct. Our U.S. Flag Code ought to stick to how and when the flag is shown, not to promote a desecration. Others are stating that the image of our opportunity is more imperative than the flexibility it symbolizes—and that is not the American way. As Lee Greenwood sings in his song “God Bless the U.S.A.,” “I thank my lucky stars to be living here today, ‘cause the flag still stands for freedom and they can’t take that away”…

    • 957 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case Study Assignment

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A. Statute 42.09(a) (3) of the Texas Penal Code prohibits the “desecration of a venerable object.” This in lemans terms prohibits the burning of flags.…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gregory Lee Johnson’s act of burning the American flag was not verbal communication.The United States Supreme Court ruled it as expressive conduct allowing it as the 1st amendment. In the case of Texas vs. Johnson, the United States Supreme Court leaned on Gregory Lee Johnson’s side, stating that this was an act of the first amendment under the United States Constitution. Gregory Lee Johnson’s charges and fines were dropped. The court case, Texas vs. Johnson closed on June 21, 1989. Shortly after the case of Texas vs. Johnson the United States Congress passed the, Flag Protection Act of 1989. The Flag Protection Act of 1989 rules that the government's interest in preserving the flag as a United States symbol is not more significant than the individual's First Amendment right to disrespect the American flag through expressive…

    • 1274 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Passage 1, "American Flag Stands for Tolerance," asserts direct ways that rights, freedom, and choices can be snatched. In the article it is stated that "each individual is to have the freedom to develop by his or her own lights, and not by the command of officialdom." Individuals should be able to live how they intent to instead of having the government decide how they should live. Furthermore why can people not stand up for their rights when "the flag stands for free expression of ideas, no matter how distastful?" People do not want other people interfering with how they want to live their lives. Having freedom snatched away can cause many individuals to do wrong things, such as burning the flag.…

    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Texas vs Johnson

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The First amendment of the Constitution of America calls for the protection of the United states citizens from the United States congress. It states that congress shall not pass any laws favoring a specific religious belief or stop any particular group from worshiping them. The first amendment also protects the United States citizen by allowing them freedom of speech/press and peaceful assembly or petition of the governments policies.(billofrightsInstitute) In 1984 Ronald Reagan was trying to run for his second term as president, however thousands of people gathered in front of the Dallas city hall to protest Reagan’s policies and in that crowd a protester named Gregory Lee Johnson. Johnson pulled a stunt that ended him up in the Dallas city court house convicting him to desecrating the U.S. flag. The Dallas city court’s decision was tried and took to the supreme court for Johnsons first amendment right being violated. The supreme court actually came to the decision that Johnson was protected by the first amendment. “After this decision by the supreme court, there has been six times the house of representatives have tried to vote a constitutional amendment known as Flag desecration amendment which stated “ congress shall have power to prohibit the physical desecration of the flag”. This amendment has not received the 67 votes it needs to pass but hasn’t been less than 63 voted for all six occasions” (billofrightsInstitute)…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The article talks about how the Supreme Court based a law by a 5-to-4 that a person can show their disagreement with the governmental policies by burning the American flag. It gives a vivid example of the other side of the law in china where people who peacefully express disagreement with the government policies may be slaughtered. Allen goes on to talk about how American flag is a cherished symbol of our nation. Allen also talks about how this is technically abiding by the First Amendment, It is the freedom of the people to express there freedom of expression of speech. He thinks that it is just an ironic situation because of the fundamental commitment to freedom.…

    • 226 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wanting to keep the flag around for heritage reasons in museums and places that preserve past flags is completely okay. Whenever it comes to wearing the flag or flying it on important buildings under the American flag is where it becomes inappropriate. Coski (2005) states that in the 1980s the NAACP tried to rally or annul the use of the Confederate Beauregard Battle Flag in states and emblems. Coski shares my current opinion that Southern states should not banish the Beauregard Battle Flag but yet try to understand that its role and meaning are different for different groups of people. The flag should just be retired to museums.…

    • 877 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is still being debated today whether or not flag burning is protected under the first amendment. The first amendment states, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances” (“First Admendment” 2016). In the case of Texas v. Johnson, the Supreme Court decided that flag burning was not protected under the first amendment because the first amendment protects activity such as symbolic speech (Staff 2013). Should there be a new amendment to protect flag burning? In 2006, the Senate rejected the attempt to amend the constitution (Babington 2006).…

    • 657 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Does freedom of speech still protect you today? In 1988, the case Texas v. Johnson, a protester named Gregory Johnson, grabbed an American flag and drenched it in kerosene, then proceeded to light it on fire. Desecrating the flag was illegal in Texas, so he was convicted one year in prison for this. This made Johnson and others argue that what he did was his right, due to freedom of speech, it was a political message, and it was legal to burn the flag in other cities. Johnson was justified in burning the flag because of his freedom of speech.…

    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Burning American Flag

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Is it right to burn a flag? If so why would someone do it? Maybe its because they feel that the united states isn’t really united as one. After reading the texts “American flag stands for tolerance” “My so called enemy” and “Texas vs. Johnson” the reader can understand the each of these texts supported information as to how different people from different religions and cultures should be accepted in our country. Also these texts tell the reader how the first amendment protects our rights to have freedom of speech freedom of religion. etc. and that we as human beings must be willing to accept people or opinions that are different from ourselves.…

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Texas V. Johnson

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In 1984, following a protest march through the streets of Dallas, Texas against the policies of the Reagan Administration, Gregory Lee Johnson was handed an American flag. Outside the Dallas City Hall, Johnson through the flag onto the ground, poured kerosene on it, and set fire to it. Many protesters around Johnson began a chant of, "America, the red, white, and blue, we spit on you!" While many protesters agreed with what Johnson had done, there were several others who felt extremely offended. In fact, one such person felt the need to gather the remains of the flag which he then buried in his yard. The protest was a nonviolent one and no one standing nearby was hurt or threatened.…

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first amendment clearly states that congress shall not make any law abridging the freedom of speech. If our government isn’t going to avid by the amendments, then why have them? If they are going to ban the confederate flag then they should be banned for not corresponding with our god given rights. The constitutional amendments are what our government is supposed to stick to.…

    • 302 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    American Flag Speeches

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Being an American, I am a true believer that our flag should not be desecrated in anyway, especially by our own citizens. When thinking of the American flag it is more than just a flag to many Americans, it is a symbol of those who have fought for us to have the rights and freedoms we have today, represents those who have died in battle, and the pride we have in our country. When and if someone desecrates our flag I believe they should be punished.…

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are many individuals and groups alike that choose to express their disdain for certain actions, laws, and behaviors through the use of Freedom of Speech. The First Amendment has been cited by many protesters when demonstrating that it is their right to Freedom of expression. Freedom of Expression is powerful enough that sometimes words do not have to be spoken for a message to be conveyed. However, not all acts are protected by the First Amendment. For example, burning the flag is protected under the First Amendment but promoting the benefits of marijuana at a school event would be protected (U.S. Courts, n.d). If by chance there is a question of constitutionality regarding the First Amendment, it is usually linked to the overbreadth doctrine. Simply meaning, an individual may feel that their rights and/or others rights to Freedom of Speech may be prohibited by laws when applied under the context in which they were written. Broadrick v. Oklahoma, 413 U.S. 601 (1973) is the most quoted case that addresses issues of the overbreadth doctrine as it pertains to the First Amendment.…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although the dispute of flag burning has come before the Supreme Court several times in the past several decades, “on June 11, 1990, the Supreme Court once again ruled that burning the flag was an example of constitutionally protected free speech” as…

    • 299 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays