Food Inc Research Paper

As meat products become increasingly available to the American general public, many people are questioning if it’s ethical to harvest animals for meat consumption. For a long time, this has been a debatable topic. Many animal advocates claim that mass production of meat has become a cruel practice to slaughter many domesticated animals under harsh conditions. As a result, people on the right side of the spectrum promote vegetarianism as a way to protect livestock from being mass slaughtered. Even though it can’t be denied that meat production overtime has become harsh toward livestock, eating meat is ethical because humans need it as an essential food source to live. However, under the circumstance that the livestock live joyful and free lives
However, it is undeniable that the modern food industry utilizes vulgar forms of meat mass production. Thus causing many animal advocates to become vegetarian. Chickens and other forms of domesticated live-stock, live in extremely packed areas which are prone to spreading infection and disease amongst animals. As a result the animals are not living natural and free lives, but instead they live in cramped and disgusting conditions. The documentary “Food inc.” exposes the mistreatment of livestock. Carole Morison, a perdue grower, shows the harsh conditions of modern farming (video). Rightists associate the cramped and catastrophic treatment of livestock with “Concentration camps” (Source C). The animal advocates emphasize that animal concentration, under miserable conditions, is a cruel form of meat consumption. Animals can’t live with their own animal instincts. Therefore, many animal rightists choose vegetarianism to avoid any tyranny toward livestock. The Humane research council states that 30% of vegetarians avoid meat for the primary reason “to reduce suffering of animals on farms” (Source E). However, even though it is true that animals are subjected to vile forms of mistreatment, passionate vegetarians fail to mention if it is acceptable to consume meat under better farming
It is only acceptable to eat meat if the animals live free and natural lives before they are packed up to the store. Even though eating meat is important for human health, it can be agreed with vegetarians that the modern meat industry of America is miserable for animals. Under that circumstance, eating meat is unacceptable because it is not pleasant to eat meat knowing that the livestock had been tortured for its entire life. People today seem to have a food “amnesia” to what happens to animals before slaughter. Many Americans are ignorant about the vile process of modern meat production. If people are truly assured that the livestock were treated well before consumption, then people will eat with “understanding and gratitude” (Source A). So it can be seen that the average consumer will feel morally satisfied if the animal has been treated well. Therefore, eating meat under the circumstance that the livestock lived a decent life is better than eating meat from a dirty factory. In Michael Pollan’s article “An Animal’s place”; Joel Salatin’s farm, known as Polyface, is a perfect example of a farm where animals live natural and free lives. Pollan describes the farm as a joyful place for livestock to live. Pollan continues to state that the “chickens live like chickens; his cows like cows; pigs, pigs” (Source C). So it can be seen that the animals in polyface farm