Preview

Forensic Psychology

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
992 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Forensic Psychology
Assignment Unit 7

Civil Commitment and the Mentally Ill
CJ233-01: Introduction to Forensic Psychology
Sigrid Hess
Kaplan University
February 18, 2012

Civil Commitment and the Mentally Ill

1.How often is the insanity defense used and how successful is it?

I would like to answer this question, with the presentation of my opinion and the performed research.
It is within my opinion, that the insanity defense is used over excessively and is taking part in almost every defense to any crime. Offenders seem to have the knowledge to the use of this defense and will often provide a plea to guilty by insanity or temporary insanity, within the faith, to receive a reduced sentence. While insanity has to be a proven fact and a psychologist has to conduct a variety of tests to confirm the offender is suffering from a mental incompetence or insanity, most offenders have the ability to mislead or deceive psychologists to receive the evaluation they seek. Such action, if discovered, would actually prove the sanity of such offenders, but in most cases, it cannot be ascertained. The success of such defense is, within my view, very effective.
The performed research is revealing a different answer. According to the St. Joseph News Press (2007), it has stated the opposite to my opinion. This article within a study of the national mental health institute claim’s; “the insanity defense plea is used in less than one (1) percent of criminal cases in the United States and less than a quarter of those pleas are successful”. Retrieved from; St. Joseph News Press (2007). With these opinions and views in combination, one would have to conduct further studies on this subject, to establish the correct answer. Everyone has different sentiments, within the use of the insanity defense and the successfulness of such validation.

2. Identify and discuss the major criticisms of the insanity defense.
It is my belive,the major criticism of the insanity defense could be the



References: St. Joseph News-Press, Insanity please not often successful (2007) http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P2-14728212.html West 's Encyclopedia of American Law, edition 2 (2008) http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Insanity+Defense, Wrightsman’s Psychology and the Legal System, 6e,Forensic Assessment in Criminal Cases: Competence and Insanity, pg; 249 (2011) http://content-crj.kaplan.edu/CJ233_1201A/images/product/CJ233_Chapter08_Unit07.pdf

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Miller v. StateSupreme Court of Nevada, 1996991 P. 2d 1183People in the United States commit crimes and make up excuses why they should not be held accountable for a crime. Insanity and temporary Insanity have significant differences. One might ask themselves is there really any meaningful difference? During the history of our court system there has been many significant court decisions which address the controversy topics of insanity and temporary insanity as it relates to criminal procedures. One of the most significant court decision is Miller Vs State Supreme Court of Nevada, 1996 991 P.2d 1183.…

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This means that the guilty individual receives the fairest possible sentence. A comparison to another insanity defense used, was the case of the Esposita brothers who had clearly faked being insane to get out of a death sentence. The Esposita brothers set a plan to gain money through robbery and were well equipped to take lives if anyone stood in the way. Both brothers were charged for murder of police officers and citizens. During their court trial, the Esposita brothers pretended to show signs of insanity by speaking in gibberish and banging their heads against the table. The jury was not convinced due to lack of evidence showing past history of insanity and had sentenced them to death by electrocution in 1942. This is one of many cases where a criminal had attempted to get out of a deserving consequence by using the insanity defense. Although it is rarely the case, some criminals convince the judge that they truly are insane when in fact, they were simply successful in fooling the judge. In comparison to the case of Dennis Pozniak who clearly was insane, it was determined that there was no benefit to the actions performed by Dennis and it was simply a spontaneous event that was brought due to an insane state of mind. Is it fair for an individual to get out of their deserved consequence simply because they convinced the judge that they are insane? I believe that unless the…

    • 1368 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The insanity defense is not covered as its own constitutional right, although it faults under the due process clause in the 5th and 14th amendments. The states define their own elements for what constitutes insanity, using the common law as a guideline. Mens rea—Latin for the “guilty mind” — is one of the necessary elements for insanity. If found incompetent, the person is usually charged to…

    • 295 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Introduction: The insanity defense has been used for many years and believed to began around the 1720’s where the first formal defense was used in a court in 1724. Judge Tracy, the judge that ruled over the first case coined a term “The wild beast standard” that states “for someone to be insane he must be totally deprived of his understanding and memory, and not know what he is doing anymore than an infant, a brute, or a wild beast” (Neville, 2010, pp.3-4). After the Daniel M’Naghten case, a man who attempted to kill a prime minister due to his belief that the prime minister was conspiring against him ended up killing the secretary, there was a new rule many states began to follow. After M’Naghten was found insane by multiple experts because he was unable to know the difference of right and wrong therefore he was acquitted of all charges (Neville, 2010, p. 5) a rule was developed labeled after M’Naghten.…

    • 1049 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    According to Frontline, it is used in “less than 1 percent of felony cases, and is successful in only a fraction of those” (Insanity defense faqs). Less than one percent, that’s how many times the insanity defense is used. According to the National Institute of Corrections, “In a 2006 Special Report, the Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS) estimated that 705,600 mentally ill adults were incarcerated in State prisons, 78,800 in Federal prisons and 479,900 in local jails” (Mentally ill persons). Look at those numbers. The number of mentally ill adults incarcerated in state, federal and local prisons or jails is a staggering one million two hundred sixty four thousand three hundred mentally ill, that is 1,264,300 incarcerated in the United States. Why then, is the percentage less than1% when it comes to those who use the insanity defense during court? The Sentencing Project says that there are “2.2 million people currently in the nation's prisons or jails” (Incarceration). According to the numbers, the mentally ill make up more than 1% of those incarcerated. In fact, the mentally ill in the prison system is at 57% of those in the entire prison system. How is it that 57% of inmates in prison are mentally ill, but only 1% use the insanity defense? What is wrong with the insanity defense then? For starters, it is difficult to prove and the burden of proof lies on the…

    • 1349 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The insanity defense should be allowed for those with a mental illness when they commit a crime since they are not in control of their actions. “If a person really does have mental incapacity, and it will be considered that his condition has caused him to commit a capital crime, which means the defense could save his life. Put in mind that a capital crime carries a punishment of eventual death. However, being found not guilty because of insanity means that a capital punishment is out of the question. It could mean that the accused would just be housed at a professional mental health treatment center. Though it might not be jail, still it gets him off the streets,” (12 Profound Pros and Cons of the Insanity Defense [Web log post]. (n.d.). Retrieved May 16,…

    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Summer

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages

    How can someone be claimed as insane? In the case of Andrea Yates, she was found not guilty by reasons of insanity. Clearly Andrea Yates was insane because of what she did. Andrea Yates murdered her five children. Andrea Yates has thought about killing her children for quite a while before she really did kill her children. Her husband Rusty Yates knew about his wife trying to kill their children and caught Andrea before she did it the first time. Andrea Yates attempted to kill her kids before and she didn’t kill them in earlier attempts because she didn’t think she was ready. I believe that Andrea Yates was insane because she has pre-planned killing her kids before and she finally did it.…

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Defenses There Legal are three different types of legal defenses I have read about that could be used in court. Therefore, even if you are charged with first-degree premeditated murder, if you use these defenses you will not take the full charge, depending on what the crime was or what defense is used. Three of them that I found interesting were self-defense, insanity claim, and provocation. If a being, applies sensible power against a person who poses a risk of impending bodily harm or fatality, that person then, possibly can be cleared of first-degree murder. To dispute textbook self-defense brings about a thorough acquittal, the risk must be serious and the approachable force must be balanced and sensible. A dispute of flawed self-defense will not result in an overall acquittal, but may result in a conviction on a minor charge, such as manslaughter. Imperfect self-defense occurs when the offender's awareness of the threat is genuine but not reasonable, or if the offender uses more dynamism than is rightfully necessary to calm the threat. The same concepts apply to a similar defense of others disagreements. In stating someone is not guilty due to insanity, the defense is more or less arguing that to a mental deficiency, the person is not proficient of forming the target needed to prove first-degree premeditated murder. The degree varies from state to state to launch an insanity defense, but most examine whether the person understands the criminal nature of his conduct at the time of the offense. Provocation is not naturally a complete justification, but rather can decrease a first-degree murder charge to a manslaughter sentence. Provocation also knocks off-balance proof of intending to argue that the wrongdoer was triggered into a temporary…

    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Summary Of Insanity Plea

    • 271 Words
    • 2 Pages

    One of the things that I found interesting in this chapter was the different tests used for the insanity plea. The first one was the M’Naghten test. It is a widely used legal test for insanity that holds people to be insane at the time they committed a crime if, because of a mental disorder, they did not know the nature of the act or did not know right from wrong. The second test discussed was the irresistible impulse test.: It is a legal test for insanity that holds people to be insane at the time they committed a crime if they were driven to do so by an uncontrollable “ fit of passion.” The third test is the Durham test which is a legal test for insanity that holds people to be insane at the time they committed a crime if their act…

    • 271 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Many people wrongly believe that there are only two ways to plead in trial, guilty and not guilty. There is also another way to plead, that most people use to try and escape any criminal responsibility, pleading not guilty by reason of insanity. Not guilty by reason of insanity refers to the defense of offenders not to deny the commission of the crime, but to assert they lacked the capacity to understand the nature of the crime or that it was wrong (Allen). The definition of pleading legally insane can differ from each state, country or jurisdiction. This is usually abused and pleaded wrongly. Therefore it is very difficult to be found not guilty this way. A study carried out in the USA found that the insanity defense is only used in about 1% of all court cases and is only successful in about 26% of those cases (New York Times). The jury must discover if the plea were true or not based on extreme psychiatric testimonies and usually lengthy trials. A prime example of this is in the murder of Elena Steinberg, also known as the sleepwalk murder. In this murder Steven Steinberg was found not guilty on reasons of temporary insanity.…

    • 1115 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    References: Journal of Psychiatric Practice, May 2000, p.169, Law and Psychiatry – The Insanity Defense: Bad or Mad or Both?, William H. Reid…

    • 1913 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Criminal Justice

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages

    I do think that the insanity defense should exist- even though only 1/8th of them are successful according to our readings. What I dont like about the insanity defense is declaring someone temporarily insane. I guess I dont see how someone can momentarily be insane and commit a crime. I could see the lack of premeditation and the heat of the moment or self defense but how does that make them temporarily insane? I cannot grasp this concept at all.…

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Criminal Commitment

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages

    A number of tests have been used to help the courts make decisions to find if a person is sane to stand trial. One test is the M 'Naghten test of insanity, also called the (right-wrong test). The person was not criminally responsible if at the time of the crime, that he or she did not know that what they were doing was wrong or what the nature of the act was. A jury is required to answer two questions about the evidence they heard. One is his she or she didn 't know what they were doing when he or she committed the crime. Two was if the defendant understood that his or her actions were wrong. This test had many faults with it and people stopped using it to prove weather a person was insane or sane. The Irresistible impulse test was used as a alternative to the M 'Naghten test. This test was a theory based on the fact that the mental disease could force a person to act against their own will, and a person could be driven by a irresistible impulse. This had many faults also but was used until around the 1950 's when the Durham test came into play. This was a test that asked two questions of the jury, one did the defendant have a mental disease or defect? And if so, was the disease or defect the reason for the crime? The jury had to come back with both answers yes to give the verdict of not guilty by reason of insanity. In the 1970 's this was a test no longer used and the…

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The first question one may ask about the insanity defense is why is the insanity defense needed? According to an article written by John P. Martin, “it is an attempt to impose a moral check on a system largely designed to weigh facts…

    • 1147 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mind over Matter

    • 1288 Words
    • 6 Pages

    References: American Psychological Association (1984). United States vs. Lyons 706 F. 2d 321, retrieve http:www.apa.org/about/offices/ogc/amicus/lyons.aspx American Psychological Association (2007). Insanity Defense Position Statements, retrieve http://www.apa.org/Department/EDU/Library/APAOficialDocumentsandRelated/Posi American Law Institute (1985). Model Penal Code and Commentaries Hermann, H. D. (1997). Mental Health and Disability Law, West Group. Taber 's Cyclopedic Medical Dictionary 20 th Edition (2001) U. S Code, Title 18: Crimes and Criminal Procedures, Part I: Crimes, Chapter I; General Provision. U. S. House of Representatives, 2001. Retrieve from http://www.uscode.hose.gov/title18. Html A MATTER OVER MIND ARTICLE 2 A MATTER OVER MIND ARTICLE 3 A MATTER OVER MIND ARTICLE 4 A MATTER OVER MIND ARTICLE 5 A MATTER OVER MIND ARTICLE 6…

    • 1288 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays