Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Formal Analysis: the Cylinder Seal and the Ashurbanipal Hunting Lions

Good Essays
745 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Formal Analysis: the Cylinder Seal and the Ashurbanipal Hunting Lions
Formal Analysis: The Cylinder seal and The Ashurbanipal hunting lions The purpose of this paper is to examine the differences and similarities between early Akkadian and Assyrian art forms by comparing two figural sculptures, the Cylinder Seal (Ca. 2254 – 2193 BCE) and the Ashurbanipal hunting scene (Ca. 645 – 640 BCE). Due to cultural and periodical differences, it is unavoidable to find varying mastery of techniques, negotiated objects or subjects being depicted in the sculptures. These art works, however, are very similar with respect to their overall purpose and the manner by which early artists represented sacred persons or deities in general. And these commonalities go beyond time and provide a coherent and invariable view of Mesopotamian art and culture. As will be discussed in the succeeding paragraphs, both figural sculptures highlight the conquering power of the king and the deity, and suggest that the virtue of the higher being is to successfully protect the empire from its enemies. About 5’4” high, the Ashurbanipal hunting lion can be traced back during the reign of King Ashurbanipal (Ca. 645-640) of the Neo-Assyrian Empire. The Cylinder Seal, on the other hand, is much smaller (about 4.2 cm by 2.5 cm) and older (during the reign of Naramsin, Ca. 2254 – 2153 B.C.). These two figures, however, are very similar in terms of how they portray the king and the deity. It should be noted that both sculptures successfully portray the presence of higher beings without using the hierarchy of scale. In the Ashurbanipal hunting lion sculpture, symbols such as the headdress, the sword, and jewels suggest the royal status of the king. Similarly, the Cylinder seal uses wings with weapons, and the helmet with multiple horns to highlight Ishtar’s ultimate divinity. Using a combination of perspectives, the sculpture also suggests that Ishtar’s divinity is absolute and supreme; the ‘less’ important goddess who, by raising her hands, worships Ishtar is placed in strict profile whereas Ishtar is depicted in composite view. Both figural sculptures also underscore the power of the king and the deity through their ability to defeat or tame the beast. Ashurbanipal hunting lions, however, places more emphasis on the beasts than the Cylinder Seal does. While the lion in cylinder seal is positioned in strict profile and is merely a manifestation of Ishtar’s prominence and power, the lions in Ashurbanipal hunting scene are compassionately rendered in composite views. In this relief, the beasts, wounded yet determined and willing to fight the king’s army, almost remind the viewers of the strong and daring protagonist in a tragedy. Such emotional rendering of the lions makes the king, bravely going forward towards the beast, the center and apex of power and audacity. This concept embodies the Assyrians’ belief that their empire would stay undiminished under the protection and guidance of a powerful ruler. Finally, both sculptures seem to suggest that conquering power is the virtue of the king and the absolute divinity. The lions in the Ashurbanipal hunting represent the enemies of the Assyrian Kingdom. This particular scene appears to suggest that it is crucial for the ruler to remain strong and bold when fighting the enemies of the empire. In the Cylinder Seal, Ishtar also seems to convey the same message. In the sculpture, weapons on her wings are the part and parcel of the goddess’ body, suggesting her war-like nature. By depicting Ishtar as a belligerent deity, the Akkadians seemed to have hoped that the goddess would protect their empire from various threats, especially from neighboring kingdoms. Ashurbanipal hunting lions relief sculpture and the Cylinder seal are works of arts situated at the distant ends of the Mesopotamian spectrum. Even though these sculptures are from two different cultures in two different time periods, they still have many similarities that resonate throughout the Mesopotamian culture. It should be noted that, with respect to the overall purpose and the manner by which early artists represented sacred persons and deities, both sculptures embody Mesopotamians’ belief that the conquering power of the king and the deity would protect the empire from its enemies. These interconnections in the sculptures go beyond time and provide a coherent and invariable view of Mesopotamian art and culture.

[pic]
Figure1. Ashurbanipal hunting lions. Palace of Ashurbanipal, Ninevah, Iraq, ca.645-640 BCE. Gypsum, 5’4”. British Museum, London.

Figure2. Cylinder Seal. Ninevah, Iraq, ca. 2254-2193 B.C. Black stone, 4.2 cm x 2.5 cm. The Oriental Institute, Chicago.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Alacahoyuk Summary

    • 1481 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In the article “The sculptures of Alacahoyuk: A key to religious symbolism in Hittite representational art”, a Professor of Hittitology, Piotr Taracha, proposes that Alacahoyuk was one of The Hittites holy cities. According to Piotr Taracha, Alacahoyuk is located in Northern Anatolia just above the capital, Hattusa. The significance of the site Alacahoyuk is analyzed for its architectural composition that is associated with Hittite religion. The sculpture, The Sphinx Gate is structures as an entry way into the remains of an important Hittite center, Alacahoyuk. The towers depict images of two figures of a royal status said to be the sun-goddess and the tutelary God (page111). Along the brick walls are scenes of cult and hunting the role the pair play in religion and sustenance. (Page 110).His interpretations concluded from the Sphinx Gate show depictions of hunting scenes that is compared to other Hittite art. In these scenes we see the Sun…

    • 1481 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For example, the statue of Khafre sits lifeless and majestic on his throne “flanked by lions” (3), which stabilizes and connects him to the original stone, out of which it is carved. He is eternally unmoving and has an expressionless face. This statue of Khafre was created as a vessel for his Ka and presents…

    • 391 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the front panel of the sarcophagus are the figures of the Greek god Dionysus. The scale of Dionysus is much more biggest when compare with the four seasons and the Bacchus or cultic objects which carved only with a smaller scale. Dionysus is the main focal point in this sarcophagus because it is different from the other and he is the only who riding a big beast of panther which make the scale even bigger. Dionysus is holding a scepter or thyrsus in his left hand and pouring wine with his right hand. To the right side of Dionysus, there is the figure of a satyr he is the follower of the god Dionysus. Satyr is holding a cup where the Greek god is pouring the wine for him.…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stele Of Hammurabi

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages

    All of these reliefs reflect the changing religious political ideas of the ancient Middle East because each artwork as it goes on changes gradually. For example the Warka Vase shows naked men with baskets and jars overflowing with goods to later present to the goddess Inanna, and put it in her temple. Another nude man brings a basket directly to the goddess in the top band showing praise and respect. The Sumerians focus a lot on giving praise to their gods. In the next image there is the Victory stele of Naram-Sin.…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Puabi’s golden headdress, from Ur, Iraq and made around 2550-2450 B.C.E., has political significance. The elaborate piece is comprised of a wreath, earrings, coiffed hair, necklaces, and body jewelry. Puabi was a queen in her own right and this object has political significance because it demonstrates the importance of hierarchy in early Mesopotamia. The decadence of the headdress shows that it was meant to display dominance. This object is art because people can appreciate it visually and aesthetically. It does not have much practical use since it is very ornate and hard to wear. The headdress was presented in the middle of the gallery and was a definite focal point of the exhibit. Therefore, it was meant to be a piece that was admired for its beauty and grandeur.…

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The art pieces I choose to analyze are two paired Star Tiles with Vegetal Motifs and Inscriptions. The evolution of the purpose of an artifact reveals the development of complexity within Islamic empires as time progresses. The first Islamic dynasties controlled large unified Islamic states and religious pieces served as the main type of art within their empires. The goal of the gallery layout is to display to an uninformed viewer the evolution of Islamic art over the course of a millennium, and to reveal the four unifying characteristics that emerged, figural representation, geometric patterns, vegetal patterns, and calligraphy (The Met). The first artifacts are the oldest and are only decorated with calligraphy. The pieces eventually progress to geometric and vegetal patterns. The last element to appear is figural representations, because they are the most complicated. The tiles contain three of these main characteristics; calligraphy, vegetal patterns, and geometric patterns.…

    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mesopotamia as ‘the cradle of civilization” was one of the first civilizations- in the modern sense of the word, to arise. It is understandable then that it set the standards for what government, religion, art and culture should be for the countless civilizations that followed it. Their system of government in particular left a huge impression on how later civilizations wrote laws judging the behavior of the people, in fact historians agree that Hammurabi’s code of law- although somewhat cruel at times, was surprisingly ahead of its times. The Mesopotamian structure of religion with its many gods and goddesses also proved very popular as it was replicated in some of the most well known civilizations of Egypt, Greece and Rome. Artists of Mesopotamia also set the standards for how generations of artists would interpret the world around them in art.…

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Statue of Akhenaten

    • 891 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Statues come in many different forms, sizes, styles, and reasons. After watching our online video and I saw a statue from “The New Kingdom” of the infamous Pharaoh Akhenaten. I was intrigued by the unusual features of this statue. They were unlike the traditional features on a statue I am accustomed to. My research was to find out a little more about this Pharaoh and why he was featured so radically different from the typical statues I was accustomed seeing from ancient times including that of ancient Egyptian tradition. I took a look at some historical facts to see if they may help put the pieces of the puzzle together.…

    • 891 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lion Hunt of Ashurbanipal

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the relief Ashurbanipal is highly decorated both in appearance and stature; his head is draped with a crown that has a flower design, which also reoccurs on his tunic from his waist down to the first break. His hair is neatly formed under the crown and his beard is neatly formed denoting his status as someone of power due to its size and style. His left hand is out-stretched grabbing the lions throat while his right hand holding a sword thrusting it into the lions abdomen. One would also notice the carved detail in his right hand showing the forearms muscles while holding the hilt of the sword. Also in his left arm he is holding a bow around his shoulders. Ashurbanipal’s upper portion of his tunic is detailed with horizontal and vertical lines which make it look like it is some form of stippling. The lower portion of his tunic is detailed with geometric flower shapes and has seven breaks total. The other six breaks have circular shapes or diagonal lines. His calves are also detailed with some form of hatched texture perhaps some form of chainmail. This figure is wearing some form of footwear that is bound by threads wrapped around his ankle to his calves.…

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Olmec Art Research Paper

    • 659 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Olmec arts and their iconography are full of mysteries. Many archeologists researched and worked their best to figure out the meaning behind in each different symbol and leave many writing about Olmec arts and their symbol means. The young male stone statue has many similarity in other Olmec sculptures and we can identify the meaning behind this sculpture by comparing with other art works and using credible book wroted by archeologists. Different parts of the young male stone statue (fig.1) might have symbolic importance, representing ‘priests’ or ‘mediators’, these being: human characteristics, headdress, pose, and ceremonial bar.…

    • 659 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this article, Ruth Glynn sets out to explore the mysterious and oft misunderstood iconography of a select group of images. Specifically those depicting the hero Herakles as he grapples with the sea god Nereus who was later replaced with images of Triton. Her goal, is to explain why this change took place as well as the significance. This she does though a study of the iconographical significance of the figures and their attributes. She then moves on the a detailed study of Attic era vases, marking out three different groups based on the imagery.…

    • 571 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout Egypt, during the middle empire art evolved as a symbol for power and permanence featuring straight lines and powerful figures; as time passed art evolved again morphing from simply representational images of man to the more idealized and anatomically correct style of Roman art. As art became more and more prevalent through the late 3rd and early 4th century’s artists began to focus more on anatomical perfection and realism borrowing artistic elements from other cultures such as the Greeks. Though the artistic styles of ancient Egypt and early Roman art vary widely, the underlying symbolism remains the same. This is clear in both the Egyptian Sculpture Vizier (Figure 1) and the Roman sculpture Bust of and Unknown Man (Figure 2). Where the ideas and concepts of both sculptures are essentially the same, their vastly different styles are evident of the time periods in which they were made.…

    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    museum paper

    • 547 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Just like many other pieces of art, this sculpture has many symbols. King Senwosret III is shown with a very firm body, this symbolizes that he is powerful. He is wearing a head cloth called a nemes. Pharaohs in ancient Egypt wore Nemes. The nemes is another symbol to show the kings power. On the front of the nemes there is a cobra. The cobra represents that he is royalty. King Senwosret III is wearing a short kilt, which was traditional Egyptian royal clothing so that is also used to show he is royalty. If you look down at his feet, under them you see nine bows. These nine bows are also symbolic. They…

    • 547 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In this essay we’ll discuss the similarities and differences between two pieces of art from different civilizations. One difference that we’ll take note of beforehand is that the Stele of Naram-Sin is an Akkadian piece while the Palette of King Narmer is Egyptian. Now just because they’re from different cultures, you’d be surprised what they have in common. And thus, we start with the similarities of both pieces.…

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Comparison

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages

    I have chosen two statues from different eras to make a comparison, Marble statue of Dionysos leaning on an Archaistic Female Figure from the Roman era and Bronze statue of Artemis and a deer from Greek or Roman, late Hellenistic or early Imperial periods. The reason why I have chosen these two objects are that both of them have one big figure and one small figure which makes eyes of viewers move around. They also depicted gods with smaller figures. These two statues have many differences as they are made of different materials and have different poses even though these have similar composition.…

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics