Assignment 1.4
The formal justice process includes a series of steps from the initial contact to post release. These formal justice cases receive a full measure of rights and procedures. The formal justice process contains 15 stages, each of which is a decision point through which cases flow. The 15 steps are the following. 1) Initial contact 2) Investigation 3) Arrest 4) Custody 5) Charging 6) Preliminary Hearing/Grand Jury 7) Arraignment 8) Bail/Detention 9) Plea Bargaining 10) Trial/Adjudication 11) Sentencing/Disposition 12) Appeal/ Post Conviction Remedies 13) Correctional Treatment 14) Release 15) Post Release
Justice expert Herbert Packer described the formal criminal justice process as an “assembly line conveyor belt” which moves an endless stream of cases.
Criminal acts that are very serious may receive the full process that the criminal justice system has to offer, from arrest to trial. However, less serious cases are often settled long before the formal process has run full course, this is known as informal justice. Informal justice can also be described as the cooperation between the offender and the law. This cooperation can take place pre or post conviction. For example, police may be willing to make a deal with a suspect to gain cooperation or a prosecutor may bargain with a defense attorney to get a plea of guilty as charged for a promise of leniency. I see informal justice as a compromise to benefit both parties.
I feel that informal justice is an important tool in the criminal justice system. Sometimes you have to work with petty criminals to take down more violent offenders and in other cases, accept plea bargains in order to ensure that the accused receives punishment. In other instance plea bargains are very important so that victims are not re-victimized throughout the trial process. It’s important to get some cases in and out of the system as quickly as possible to avoid court overload and so more attention can be paid to more serious offenses.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Plea bargains are an assertion in a criminal case between the prosecutor and the respondent that ordinarily includes the litigant conceding so as to get a lesser offense or sentence. Plea bargains are frequently alluded to as truly simply building up a common affirmation of the case's qualities and shortcomings, and don't really reflect a conventional feeling of Justice. In principle, courts are glad to host the individual gatherings work out an answer independent from anyone else, yet it makes one wonder…
- 182 Words
- 1 Page
Good Essays -
What procedural steps must the officers perform following John’s arrest and interview at the police station? After arrest, a suspect is then taken into police custody and “booked” or “processed.” During booking a police officer will then take the suspects personal information (i.e., name, date of birth, physical characteristics); records any…
- 943 Words
- 4 Pages
Better Essays -
2). “The Community-Based Problem-Solving Criminal Justice Initiative aims to broaden the scope of problem-solving courts, testing their approach to wider defendant populations and applying key problem-solving principles (e.g., links to social services, rigorous judicial monitoring, and aggressive community outreach) outside of the problem-solving court context” (OJP, n.d., para. 3). Problem- Solving Courts are important initiatives to fund because they help keep society safe by trying to improve the recidivism rate. This will cause a reduction in crime, and justice agencies case-loads will lighten; thus, freeing up the justice system to advocate for crime victims, and restore faith within the criminal justice…
- 1173 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
By not producing results that correlate with the outcome, plea bargaining weakens the validity of the criminal justice system. Validity or legitimacy is a very important characteristic of the legal system’s effectiveness. The view of the legal system is determined considerably on whether or not the system operates in harmony with basic rules of procedural fairness, for example treating cases alike or allowing parties an opportunity to be heard. Nevertheless, a system that fails to function under such rules will lose their…
- 623 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
This paper explains the many trends in the public and institutional criminal justice system. These trends, starting from the past, push the research into the present and future with the implementation of continuing trends and perspective ideations to aid in the progress and advancement of criminal procedures. This paper starts with the history of community and commercial criminal justice and attaches the proceedings to the present-day standing. This paper also shows an idealistic and theoretical analogy of how the criminal justice system may look in the future based on current trends.…
- 1589 Words
- 7 Pages
Better Essays -
In one of the most important contributions to systematic thought about the administration of criminal justice, Herbert Packer articulates the values supporting two models of the justice process. He notes the gulf existing between the "Due Process Model" of criminal administration, with its emphasis on the rights of the individual, and the "Crime Control Model," which sees the regulation of criminal conduct as the most important function of the judicial system.…
- 8205 Words
- 33 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Plea bargaining, also known as plea negotiation, is the most commonly used practice in the criminal justice process in which defendants are allowed to plead guilty to a lesser charge or charges (Inciardi, 2010). Involved in this process are the prosecutor and the defense, along with the person accused of committing some sort of criminal activity. According to Inciardi (2010), “It is believed that more than 90 percent of criminal convictions result from negotiated pleas of guilty” (Pg. 302).…
- 304 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
There are two types of plea bargains : The first one is a charge bargain. When the prosecutor allows a defendant to "plead guilty to a lesser charge", or to only some of the charges that have been filed against him. For example, a defendant charged with burglary may be offered the opportunity to plead guilty to "attempted burglary". A defendant charged with Drunk Driving and Driving with License Suspended may be offered the opportunity to plead guilty to just the drunk driving charge. The second plea bargain is when a defendant is told in advance what his sentence will be if he pleads guilty. This can help a prosecutor obtain a conviction if, for example, a defendant is facing serious charges and is afraid of being hit with the "maximum" sentence. Typically, sentence bargains can only be granted if they are approved by the trial judge. Many jurisdictions severely limit sentence bargaining.…
- 564 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
There are several reasons for plea bargains. In most cases, the plea bargain is to avoid the uncertainty of the jury trial. In other cases, a defendant may have pertenant information regarding other criminals allowing the broader prosecution of other crimes. And in still other cases, prosecutors may be convinced that they have the right defendant and an accurate charge as to the crimes committed but lack the evidence necessary to bring the successful conviction against them. Regardless of the reasoning behind plea bargining, the process is brought into motion upon the descretion of the prosecutor. The empowerment of legal sentencing through the prosecutor brings many questions regarding the legitimacy of the process and the effects that it may have on the accused, regardless of guilt or innocence.…
- 1039 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Seiter, R. P. (2008). The Role of Plea Bargaining and Sentencing. In R. P. Seiter, Corrections An Introduction 2nd Edition (pp. 47-48). Upper Saddle River: Pearson Prentice Hall.…
- 621 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
I do believe that there are instances where plea bargaining can be an effective tool in the criminal justice system, however, as it stands, the overuse of the plea bargain by prosecutors has diminished it’s potential worth as a true bargaining tool by their flagrant daily misuse. While it is understood that the case load for the courts is overwhelmed and an alternative method of securing some form of justice is needed to alleviate the overrun system, the use of the plea bargain to alleviate the overcrowded courts is not completely acceptable.…
- 444 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Plea bargaining not only serves a purpose in our criminal justice system; it has become a vital part of it. The significance of plea bargaining can be overlooked because of the implications of the wording. The term “plea bargain” sometimes implies a misnomer in the fact that it leads one to believe those who accept a plea bargain are getting off easy which in many cases is not true. In many cases, plea bargains prove to be the most efficient method of invoking justice on criminals (Bohm & Haley, 2011).…
- 451 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
@When it comes picturing the criminal justice and its various administrations most people tend to believe that for the most part it is quite rigid and regulated as every procedure has to be followed down to the letter, but they would be surprised to find out how often formal structures, policies, and preferred practices are undermined by informal rules and group processes. The practice of informal rules and group processes allows criminal justice personnel to exercise more discretion when doing their jobs as some scenarios like minor offenses are not indicative for the need to arrest people and prosecute them. To analyze this in regards to the criminal justice system there are three key pointers that one should understand like why such informal practices exist, how they function in practice, and what variations exist in their application in police, courts, and corrections.…
- 531 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Within this essay, the Theory of Justice will be broke down. It will lay out some personal information on John Rawls. It will give the principles of the theory and explain what they mean. It will also explain how the principles of these theories differ from traditional utilitarianism. Lastly it will show how justice is defined by modern criminal justice agencies and other entities involved in the criminal justice system and how it differs from security.…
- 972 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Schmalleger F. (2009) Criminal Justice Today: An Introductory Text for the 21st Century, 10th edition…
- 2337 Words
- 10 Pages
Powerful Essays