Preview

Former President Richard Nixon: Former Citizen Of The United States

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
393 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Former President Richard Nixon: Former Citizen Of The United States
Former President Richard Nixon is saying in his response to the interviewer, that a president approves of situations thinking he is does what is best for the people of the United States. The president also expects the people to carry out the situation by obeying all laws. Otherwise, the president is asking citizens to break laws and puts the people in charge of these tasks in an impossible position. The Secretary of State, Condoleezza Rice, says the United States does not torture and only does what is right for it’s people. Rice goes on to say if any citizen had authority at the time of September 11th, they would have done anything in their power to make the United States safe. This seems to be implying that it would have been okay if the president broke laws in this situation. …show more content…
The president is still a citizen of the United States; therefore laws apply to the president too. I do believe the president should have some power to ensure the safety of the people by possibly breaking laws, but this power could easily be abused. Like Richard Nixon, he did not have this power and still abused it. Also, the legislative and judicial branches do not have the power to make these decisions and nobody is considering allowing this. But, the constitution says all branches are equal in power and no branch should have complete control over something. How would the legislative and judicial branch check this power and how would they stop the president form abusing this power? If the country allows the president to break laws now, then eventually the country will allow the president to do something else and eventually the president will gain too much

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    “The stage was set for a great constitutional struggle between a President determined not to give up executive documents and materials and a Senate committee and a federal prosecutor who are determined to get them," The White House claimed “Executive Privilege” when they refused to disclose the recorded tapes of President Nixon and his aides. Nixon and his advisors became arrogant with their possession of power. The Executive Branch was disrupting the balance of power and the separation of powers written into the Constitution. No Branch, elected official, governmental worker, or even the President is above the law, but Nixon definitely…

    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case: US V. Nixon

    • 1499 Words
    • 6 Pages

    A grand jury returned indictments against seven of President Nixon’s White House staff members and political supporters of the President for violation of federal statutes in the Watergate affair,. The President on the other hand was named as an un-indicted co-conspirator. The Special Prosecutor Leon Jaworski filed a motion under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure - Rule 17 for a subpoena duces tecum, a court summons ordering the President to appear before the court and produce tapes, documents and other tangible evidence relating to precisely identified conversations and meeting between President Nixon and his aides. The District Court initially treated the subpoena material as presumptively privileged, but then concluded that the Special Prosecutor made sufficient showing to justify a subpoena for production before trial. The District Court then issued an order for an in camera examination of the subpoenaed material, rejecting President Nixon’s contentions that the judiciary lacked authority to review his assertion of absolute executive privileged and the dispute between him and the Special Prosecutor was nonjusticiable as an “intra-executive” conflict.…

    • 1499 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In my opinion is I agree that the president has usurped the constitiutional power of the Congress. I agree this statement because he is wielding the most pontent legislative power. The Constitution does quote that “All legislative powers herein granted shall be vested in the Congress of the United States.” Most people agree that he has usurped the Constitiutional Power of Congress. It also seems that the president seems to wield the legislative power. In Article 2, Section 3 of the Constitiution states that the president “shall take Care that the laws be faithfully executed.” Congress wields the legislative power and it seems the president is wielding that power.…

    • 209 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Us. V. Nixon Court Case

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages

    b) Given that the power is not absolute, should President Nixon be capable of claiming executive privilege under the aforementioned circumstances?…

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Richard M. Nixon was the 37th president of the United States of ‘murica. He is the only president in American History to resign from his position in office. He was part of the Watergate scandal but still made many great achievements in his life time. Nixon is certainly a president that will forever be in American History.…

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Under the constitution the President has military, legislative, appointment, and diplomatic power. Our framers of the constitution wanted a strong military but not complete seizure of the government. Diplomatic powers and appointment powers are also under senate’s approval. The President’s legislative power can be over ridden by congress so by far this is not one of the power points of presidency. The President has sole powers of pardons granted. Under circumstances of war and terrorism the president engages in the most power.…

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the United States all the president has the responsibility and the control of everything, because they're the president of the country and they have to be honsty with the people who live in the United States.…

    • 292 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The President of the United States is a very important and strong leader that does not have the right to officially go to war without the approval of Congress. This law is dubbed the War Powers Act since it states that the President has to notify Congress when sending troops to hostilities and if in a state of emergency, 42 hours after (SAS Institute Inc). Presidents in the past, like President Richard Nixon and George W. Bush, have argued that by enforcing the War Powers Act, Congress is taking away constitutional authorities that have been exercised for many years. On the other hand, people, such as George Mason, claim that giving the power to declare war to one singular person is a very untrustworthy situation (SAS Institute Inc). This argument…

    • 387 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    There are two perspectives on presidential power. The two perspectives are presidential power by persuasion and presidential without persuasion or unilateral. The first perspective where presidential power is persuasive means that the president needs help in order to achieve an outcome. The president tries to convince other branches of government or other high-ranking officials to implement an idea of his. This all depends on the president’s ability to bargain with other branches or even his own branch to influence policy. The Unilateral perspective means that the president can act alone when making policy decisions. The unilateral perspective forces the judiciary to react.…

    • 141 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The author Jonathan Alter has written essay titled:”time to think about torture.” Mr. alter refers to the time. It in the United States history as the: “autumn to of anger.” He describes multiple torture methods and gives examples in detail their uses. He refers to the time: Prior to September 11th, “hopelessly September 10th.” Mr. Altar explains that that era of time had many wrong assumptions about law and its enforcement in reference to terrorism. By a vote of 98 to 1 PM The Anti- terrorism bill was passed and history was made. Chief Justice Robert Jackson stated:”the Constitution is not a suicide pact. “This comment by the Chief…

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Imperial Power Dbq Essay

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The president, throughout history, has always been a symbol of the country and has had powers for their title. However, there are only limited things the President can do, while they are in power. For the most part the President has to go through the congress, which might not accept the president’s request. The president should have the power to go beyond the bounds of the Constitution when the country is dealing with war or rebellion, and to take action if the lives of US citizens are in danger or to keep international peace in foreign countries.…

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Cambodian Incursion

    • 2471 Words
    • 10 Pages

    In the recorded conversations that Richard Nixon, the 37th President of the United States, had with his White House aides, he reveals his motivations and his assumptions about the American public: “Everybody says we’ve got to protect this one and that one and the other one. The main thing we’ve got to protect is the Presidency”. He felt that the presidency granted him immunity to the law. Under his Presidency, an air of distrust of government gradually grew amongst US citizens. He led a criminal presidency yet was never indicted or prosecuted. If he were not President of the United States, he would have faced greater consequences for his actions. In this light, perhaps he was right when he claimed, in his 1977 interview with David Frost, “When…

    • 2471 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Now another question comes up: Does the government still have those certain powers? Technically, the government still has the power to do exactly what they did in the past seeing that no amendments or Supreme Court judicial reviews were passed to say that the government was wrong for doing such. In the United States Constitution: Article 1, Section 1 states some powers that the government has. One of those powers happen to be that the "The Congress shall have the power to ……… make rules for the government." This indicates that the governing body does have the power to pass acts and amendments. There aren't any limitations to what rules the government can make listed in this Article, but there are checks and balances over each branch in government. So what happens if all branches agree with the acts that are being passed? What if neither branch enforces a check on the other branch? The answer to those questions have not been decided yet. In Article 1, Section 8 of the Constitution, it says that the Writ of Habeas Corpus can be suspended in cases of rebellion or invasion of the public safety. This contradicts Amendment V which says that everyone has the right to a just and speedy trial. This is an example on how bits and pieces of the Constitution cancel each other out under various circumstances. The President himself has his own personal…

    • 1413 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The answer is yes and no. The Constitution grants that “The executive power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America” (pg. 47). This one sentence of the constitution has been disputed since as early as 1793. After over a century of dispute it is affirmed “That the president does possess “residual” or “resultant” powers over and above, or in the consequence of, his specifically granted powers to take temporary alleviative action in the presence of serious emergency.” (pg. 49). So now, what qualifies as an “emergency”? President Trump could feel that the threat of rapists from Mexico and terrorists from the Middle East is too great to ignore, thus its an emergency and he must act. In reality, Trump is authorized to build a wall and revive the pipelines going through Native Land. The thing he is not authorized to do, is ban people based on religion. The constitution states that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof” (Amendment 1) thus Trump has directly contradicted the constitution, some will say that this is dictator-like behavior. But here's the thing, Congress can reverse it all, that is why this nation was built on checks and balances. While the President does not need the approval from congress to instate an executive order, “his powers may be augmented by congress”(pg. 50) if they feel the President has acted…

    • 845 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Liberty vs Security

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages

    When the founding fathers created the government of the United States, they wanted the government not to be so constricting with its rule. In other words, freedom, but freedom in its purest can be dangerous so they had to put some security to their newly made country. They did this by giving the executive branch the power to enforce laws and keep the peace. In the beginning, it was all good but things have changed throughout the years where security had to be increased. Now-a-days, some people think security has been increase to such a point that there isn’t fair anymore but that just isn’t the case. There is now terrorism in the world people live in and the Executive branch is taking the necessary precautions to stay safe. With the Obama Administration’s war on terror, the executive branch is taking the necessary precautions to keep the nation safe with drone attacks, warrantless wiretapping, and advanced interrogation techniques.…

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays