Preview

France vs. England 17th Century

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1353 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
France vs. England 17th Century
There are mainly two types of governments that emerged during the seventeenth century. Most of the political development took place in France and England. Absolute monarchy took over throughout France while constitutionalism, or parliamentary monarchy, was becoming popular in England between 1640 and 1780. France’s absolute monarchy developed because of the nobles and kings focused on the concept of divine right. England, on the other hand, developed through the businessmen and landowners trying to prevent the central concentration of political power. These governments grasped the attention of philosophers, leaders, and churches. Eventually, both would develop and influence the modern world today in Europe and the Americas.
France was very popular at the time for creating the idea of kings reigning by divine right. This perception was that the ruler of a specific country was put there by God. It was their divine right to be there because they were performing the work of God. The king’s subjects were not to question the decisions of the king because it was God’s will; and who can question God? King Louis XIV was the most influential towards divine rights. He expected to be treated like a god because he was His representative on earth. Louis XIV was supported by Bishop Jacques-Bénigne Bossuet, who was the leader of French Catholicism in the seventeenth century. He used examples from the New Testament of rulers who were only answerable to God. Popes had insisted since the medieval times that they could only be judged by God. Bossuet and Louis XIV then argued that only God had the right to judge kings. In England, there was a lot of turmoil between the reigning monarchs and large landowners. English monarchs tried to copy France with their financial system that did not

depend heavily on the estates, diets, or assemblies of nobles. By doing this, it helped to grant French monarchs absolute rule. While easily achieved in France, the English

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    After 1650 England used its naval power to break Dutch dominance in overseas trade. The English government also improved its financial position by collecting taxes directly and by creating a central bank. 4. The French government streamlined tax collection, used protective tariffs to promote domestic industries, and improved its transportation network. The French were not, however, able to introduce direct tax collection, tax the land of nobles, or secure low-cost loans.…

    • 4515 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    For Louis XIV, achieving religious unity in France was of major concern as it was a challenge to his absolutism. Being a devote Catholic, Louis wanted to unite France under Catholicism as the presence of other unorthodox religions meant that Louis was not supported in every way, like an absolute King should be. Many, including Louis, saw the King of France to be ‘The Most Christian King’, and so, in order to comply with this, achieving religious unity would be essential. Throughout his reign Louis XIV attempted to persecute other religious groups within France such as the Huguenots, Jansenists and the Quietists, his success and the consequences in doing so effectively decided his overall success in achieving unity.…

    • 995 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The 17th and 18th centuries were a period filled with nation building and expansion across the globe as extensive, and often overseas, holdings became an indicator of a strong and wealthy country in this politically competitive era. However, the extent of a ruler's control was not their only concern. Many monarchs throughout Europe took great initiative to consolidate and increase their power, building absolute monarchies in which they held absolute power. The pursuit of political absolutism frequently stemmed from past conflict involving the various monarchs and included practices such as increasing the authority and control over the nobility, building standing armies, and independently collecting funds, the manner of which were similar between many rulers. An increase in the subjugation and control of nobles is most evident in the reigns of Louis XIV of France as well as…

    • 2606 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    nation. In order to become a true absolute ruler Louis xiv needed to make sure…

    • 853 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the later portion of the 1600’s, the monarchial systems of both England and France were changing. England strayed away from an absolute monarch and ran toward a mightier parliament instead. The opposite was occurring in France as Louis XIV strengthened his own office while weakening the general assembly of France, the Estates General. Absolutism, the political situation in which a monarch controls makes all political, social, economic, and cultural decisions in a government without checks or balances, had been introduced by Charles I and James I. However, it never took hold. In France, Louis XIV took absolutism to extremes, claiming to be a servant of God. A limited monarch, England’s monarchial system, is a government in which a monarch…

    • 949 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some main differences between the two governments in England and France are: in France, the country was ruled by one strong, almost all powerful ruler who could control every aspect of society. In contrast, England was ruled by more than one person with limited power. This created a checks and balances system where, if one ruler steps out of line, the others are there to correct him/her. This helped to make sure one ruler wouldn't get too much power and harm the country. France on the other hand, didn't have this kind of security. A second difference between these two governments is that the French monarchs had a sufficient amount of money, and the English monarchs didn't, and since the English monarchs needed money they went to Parliament for help. In absolutist forms of government,…

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Experience of France and England in the 17th century demonstrates the intellectual and practical superiority of absolutism over constitutionalism. Absolutism in France was much more secure than Constitutionalism in England. Absolutism controlled all competing interest groups and organized all religious sects. Louis XIV had centralized power and control under his authority in France while Constitutionalism in England failed to create absolute monarchy. Constitutionalism in England dealt with James I, Charles I, and James II that led to a catastrophe.…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Absolutism Dbq Analysis

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages

    There were many forms of government through the 17th and 18th century. Two forms of government that were mainly used; were democracy and absolutism. Both of these government types were affective in their own ways, but also had various similarities and differences. Philosophers also helped with changing 17th and 18th century Europeans way of thinking; and view the teachings of the Catholic Church.…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    During the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries there were two forms of government. The two forms of government were democracy and absolutism. Both of these forms of government were effective in their own ways. Absolutism though was the most effective during this time. Absolutism is when the ruler has unlimited power. Many rulers had a democracy government but absolutism was more effective because the rulers had all the power and it was hard to take advantage of them rather than a democracy where many rulers can get over thrown by the people of that country.…

    • 967 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    One reason why absolute monarchy was effective is because the decisions were made quickly. Rather than having whole groups of people trying to share their ideas, it was much easier to just have one head, deciding what he/she thinks is the best idea. This idea was supported by King Louis XIV, a French monarch. According to Louis XIV, “The head alone has the right to deliberate and decide, and the functions of all the other members consist only in carrying out the commands given to them... The interest of the state must come first...” (Document 3). Although his ideas were unsupported by some philosophes such as Montesquieu, who believed in executive, legislative, and judicial powers, people in the 17th and 18th century did not have enough time to think deeply, they preferred to rather survive than die trying to make new laws (Document 6).…

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    At the beginning of the 1600s, England and France had one goal in mind, complete and absolute power. In the second half of the seventeenth century, we see England evolve from an absolutist monarchy into a monarchy that could only rule by consent of the parliament. France, on the other hand, continued with an almighty king.…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Absolutism Essay Example 7

    • 1113 Words
    • 5 Pages

    During the 1700’s and 1800’s the nations began to follow a form of government known as absolutism. Absolutism is a form of government in which the sovereign power or authority came from one monarch who was said to rule by divine right. Divine right is the belief that the monarch was given the power to rule by god. This means that only god was above the ruler. This belief would cause the citizens to follow the monarch’s wishes. During this period of time, absolute monarchies were set up in France, Spain, Prussia, Austria, Russia, and England. The monarchs of these nations had there own methods for ruling their Nation, but they shared many ideologies and practices that are common in an absolutist Government.…

    • 1113 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Absolutism - 2

    • 550 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Europe’s nobility saw absolutism as a complete loss of political power and influence. Absolutism was the governmental principle that the reigning monarch has a great, divine power, which is hindered by no one else within the country they rule. The 17th and 18th centuries was period in which nobles once held power and influence over government was diminished to the precipice of oblivion. King Louis XIV in France, the Hohenzollerns of Prussia, and Peter the Great of Russia all sought complete control of their territories. Although their economic statuses remained, the power of the European nobles had weakened.…

    • 550 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dbq on Absolutism

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Certain factors of absolutism with the ideals of the nobility would bring strength to the economy that was based on domestic and foreign trade, land holdings, a centralized government, and an increase in military fortitude. The upper class invested their fortunes into becoming political leaders and to serve by the king. Jean-Baptiste Colbert, the French Minister of Finance, advised King Louis XIV to pursue the conditions of domestic and foreign trade. With a surplus of money came a surplus of labor, his people were able to earn a living and travel across the waters for profit. Money is the foundation of any world order; if the nation has a solid foundation, then the benefit of the nobles are higher, exposing the reason of the nobles true motives to supporting the king. (Document1) In regards to property the lands were all held in the hands of the kings from the secular and the ecclesiastical classes. It’s a trade between the nobles and monarchs to do as they please with their land, like being a mandate for example. (Document 9) The king is to rule “under the divine law” and his subordinates must follow obediently. These servants would not question any authority given by the king for their belief of divinity. (Document 7) The Civil…

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In France, starting with Henry IV, the status of nobility started to fall when Henry started the idea of "nobles of the robe" in which middle class citizens could buy nobility from the king. This diluted the nobles, which weakened their power and hurt them considerably. Louis XIII and his son continued this and took more of their power away as well. Cardinal Richelieu started the intendant system, which recruited members of the middle class t watch the nobles and report back to the king. This took away power from the nobles to have less influence in the government of France. Continuing the intendant system, Louis XIV had also built the palace of Versailles and forced the nobles to move in. This caused the nobles to fight for the attention of the king and they focused less on the issues of France. Also, living in the palace of the king, one could always watch the nobles to make sure they weren't planning, for example, an uprising. In conclusion, French kings took steps to ensure absolute power and took away the power of the nobles.…

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays