Preview

Frankenstein Carnivorism Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1644 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Frankenstein Carnivorism Analysis
The recognition of the similarities between the species contradicts the cultural assumption that flesh consumption is native to the human diet.
Shelley establishes the monster as a human-animal hybrid to deconstruct the binaries that consumers rely on to remove the absent referent and justify the consumption of meat. Frankenstein creates the physique of his monster using body parts from “the damps of the grave,” as well as “the dissecting room and the slaughterhouse” (Shelley 34). The creator constructs the monster from both human and animal carcasses, resulting in an animated representation of the similarities between Homo sapiens and herbivores. In the article “An Already Alienated Animality: Frankenstein as a Gothic Narrative of Carnivorism” Jackson Petsche supports
…show more content…
In the Book of Genesis, God establishes the native inhabitants of the Garden of Eden as herbivores by stating “I give you every seed-bearing plant on the face of the whole earth and every tree that has fruit with seed in it. They will be yours for food” (Genesis 1:30). Although God grants the Homo sapiens sovereignty of the animal sphere, he initially nourishes the human body with a fruitarian diet. Similarly, when the monster requests for Victor to create another member of his species, he describes the genesis of the homo sapiens’ inceptive nature by stating “I do not destroy the lamb and the kid to glut my appetite; acorns and berries afford me sufficient nourishment... the picture I present to you is peaceful and human” (Shelley 103). The correlation between the Garden of Eden’s plant-based ailment and the monster’s vegetarian diet conveys the proposition that the original inhabitants of human society rely on crops for sustenance. The monster and Eve’s herbivore diets prove vegetarianism to be the natural, primordial diet of humanity in a theological

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Pollan, Michael. “The Feedlot: Making Meat.” The Omnivore’s Dilemma: A Natural History of Four Meals. (2006): 70-84. Print.…

    • 317 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    La Brea Tar Pits

    • 2573 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Stanford, C.B. & Bunn, H. T. (2001) Meat-Eating & Human Evolution New York: Oxford UP.…

    • 2573 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Shelley’s Gothic novel, Frankenstein, explores the complex nature of mankind by considering the consequences of an unrestricted pursuit of science. A rise in scientific experimentation with Galvanism during Shelley’s time is reflected through the protagonist Victor as he uses it to bestow life. Shelley portrays Victor and the Creature as complex beings, demonstrating both inhuman and human qualities. Despite this, the subsequent rejection by his creator and the De Lacy family drives the Creature to ‘eternal rejection and vengeance of mankind’. Victor’s initial response when meeting the creature, demonstrates his savage, cruel treatment and lack of responsibility towards his creation.…

    • 1034 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Imagine a world where you create a being out of disembodied people. A said being that has such a terrifying effect that you are horrified to look at. The main character of the Frankenstein does such thing. The novel Frankenstein is a well known source of literary canon and is worthy of continuous study. Mary Shelley’s Romantic novel, Frankenstein, is worthy of continued study due to its literary canon, achieved through her commentary of men in a State of Nature and their Marxist struggle of power. The Creature who is created by Victor, goes through a journey of self discovery and lets his persona be shaped by outside forces. State of Nature essentially makes him bad, and his Marxist struggle for power over his creator Victor leads to his downfall.…

    • 171 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Both Shelley and Scott scrutinise the importance of humanity’s sense of morality from the perspectives of their relative social and historical contexts and through this, criticise man’s lack of morality due to ambition. In “Frankenstein” the birth of the Creature alludes to the creation of Man, the Creature reaching for Victor’s embrace, inversely mimicking God reaching out to Adam. Instead, Victor’s attitude is reactionary and domineering as he ostracises the Creature and labels him “daemon,” completely disregarding the value of patriarchal responsibility prevalent in Shelley’s era. Contrastingly, the Creature’s equitable nature is portrayed through his employment of logos, “Do your duty towards me, and I will do mine towards you” and is ultimately humanised as he utilises the biblical parallelism of Paradise Lost: “I ought to be thy Adam, but I am rather the fallen angel.” Here, the Creature’s rational statement is juxtaposed with Victor’s use of pest imagery “Begone! Vile insect,” whereby the Creature’s developed sense of morality in comparison to Victor’s tyrannical behaviour reflects Shelley’s concerns of morality deficient humans. Thus, Shelley uses the Creature to comment upon the effects of over-ambition in humans lacking morality.…

    • 1145 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The parallel concept of humanity is highlighted through different paradigms. Shelley employs the mise-en-abyme and gothic horror form to highlight how monstrosity (and ultimately humanity) is not defined by the physical, whilst Scott emphasises this in BR through the crime fiction elements which focus on the grey areas of humanity through the simulacra replicants. The physical monstrosity of the creature is juxtaposed with the internal monstrosity of F through the combined mise-en-abyme and gothic form of the novel. The dark and gothic imagery employed to describe the monster in F’s perspective: “his yellow skin... watery eyes… shrivelled complexion and straight black lips” repulses the audience. However, through the mise-en-abyme form, readers are able to empathise with the monster’s pain: “I was a poor, miserable wretch”. Consequently, F’s humanity is questioned as Shelley delves deeper into the monster’s character, to the extent that F becomes the real monster even though he is not physically monstrous. This paralleled theme is further enhanced in BR through the ambiguity of the crime fiction form. This is shown through the simulacrum nature of the replicants and is juxtaposed to the monstrosity in F, as there is no now physical distinction of humanity. This “More human than human” approach is highlighted not just physically, but also…

    • 740 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Shelley wants the reader to feel compassion for creature as well as for Frankenstein. She writes as though she is trying to distinguish the idea of a good or bad in a person. In her biography, written and research by the European Graduate School Program, that she is atheist and you can really tell that by reading the novel. Things such as morals and ethics can be easily leaned not only by attending the church but merely social interactions and self-education. I think that this is shown through the creature in how he is so neglected but continues to persevere and gain his own knowledge and wisdom through his sensations and passions. Mary Shelley created something more than just a…

    • 1460 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The diction used by Mary Shelley in her novel Frankenstein varies throughout the chapters varying in tone. Chapter five is the beginning of the end of Victor Frankenstein. There he creates the beast which will torment his life forever. The diction used in this chapter is haunting in the sense that it foreshadows the fall of Frankenstein. Shelley describes the newborn creature as “beautiful”, this creates a theme of amazement of what science can do but it quickly shifts. A few sentences later Shelley describes him with a more “horrid contrast” pointing out how hideous the creature is. This foreshadows the grief the beast will encounter due to his physical appearance, that no human being will ever love him. Through Shelley’s use of imagery…

    • 346 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Frankenstein, Mary Shelley presents a powerful depiction of monstrous nature that is perceived to us through the use of: nature, context, contrast, perception, imagery and language in the novel. Through these devices and means, a bleak outlook of humanity as a whole is portrayed.…

    • 989 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Frankenstein Major Essay

    • 1469 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The character of The Creature in Mary Shelley’s novel, Frankenstein, endures a life of denial, abandonment and isolation. Due to his unusual appearance, society and his creator, Victor Frankenstein, reject him. The creature was crafted into an innocent being with no evidence of any previous knowledge. He is developed into an actual monster due to his unstable upbringing as well as a life without companionship. It is deemed that the creature is an evil being, but in reality it is due unfortunate life of loneliness that lead him to perform unjust actions. The character of the creature should not be viewed as evil, but unloved as it is evident from the hatred his creator had for him, his desperation for a companion and society’s denial towards him that he was ultimately not an evil being.…

    • 1469 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, Victor Frankenstein creates a creature who by connotative reasoning is considered to be a monster. Starting with his appearance the creature doesn’t have the friendliest façade. Appearing with tenebrous black hair, translucent veiny skin, and towering around eight feet his presence is eye-opening to say the least. Upon first glance of him it seems all, if not most, reactions are to flee as if he was a reeling predator. Imagine being called ugly by everyone you meet, and constantly…

    • 667 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Sympathy In Frankenstein

    • 2094 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Frankenstein, written by Mary Shelley and first published in 1818, follows the set of extraordinary events encompassing the life of Victor Frankenstein; natural philosophy devotee and reanimation pioneer. Characterization plays a major role in encouraging different attitudes in Frankenstein, an example being how the reader is encouraged to feel sympathy for Frankenstein and his creation throughout the novel. Aided by the differing narrative perspective, these sympathies are continually evolving, changing as the reader’s perception of the two is altered, and at the end of the novel, the reader is left questioning who the real monster is: Frankenstein, or his creation? The…

    • 2094 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Frankenstein’s monster is most frequently seen as, of course, a monster. He is fearsome naturally, but he has the mind and spirit of a developing human child. The creature’s youthful demeanor exhibits itself through many examples. The most prevalent childish behaviors he has are; the creature’s fear of being alone and seeking attention and love, being completely unbiased and not judgmental at the dawn of his creation, and his lack of knowledge of the world around him.…

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    By this definition, in Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein both Victor and his creation can be perceived as monsters. Both characters breach socially established boundaries with the creature blurring the lines between life and death as well as humanity and bestiality through his combined circumstances of birth and outward appearance. Frankenstein’s creation is not of human origin, but rather exists as an amalgamation of corpses created through scientific experimentation, “a product of nature – his ingredients are 100 per cent natural – and yet by the process and the very fact of his creation, he is unnatural”. Admittedly, Frankenstein’s creation fits the definition of the archetypal monster as “a large, ugly, and frightening imaginary creature” however, this is only true in regards to his aesthetical appearance for he is shown throughout the novel to exhibit the essence of humanity through his morality, intelligence and emotional capacity. In fact…

    • 444 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The monster, although it has acquired the name Frankenstein in popular culture, remains nameless throughout the novel, signifying its lack of acceptance in a human society. The monster’s rejection stems significantly from its appearance, ranging from its "yellow skin" (Shelley 42) and "dim-white sockets" (42) to its "straight black lips” (42) and a "shriveled complexion” (42). Shelley has clearly distinguished the monster, marking the first divide between monster and human. She has also established the initial trickling of the monster’s inability to associate with humans. In fact, the monster’s own creator, Victor Frankenstein, rejects it due to its appearance and refuses to interact with the hideous beast. The monster’s appearance prevents other characters from seriously interacting with the monster, as they form a prejudice against a non-human being. The fear of that which is non-human lingers throughout Shelley’s…

    • 1844 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays