Preview

Frederick Engels's Argument On Housing Shortage

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
585 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Frederick Engels's Argument On Housing Shortage
Engels’s Argument on Housing Shortage

In 1887, Frederick Engels published his book called “The Housing Question” where he strongly advised to abolish the system of capitalism. In this paper, one will look into Engels’s logicality on the steps he uses to connect capitalism and housing shortage. Through the process of capitalism, the rise of Haussmannization, and the never-ending circle of housing shortage, readers will understand why Engels believes that capitalism should be removed to solve housing shortage.

Engels and other communists claim that capitalism oppresses the working class and makes them suffer. According to Engels (1887), the current social order allows the capitalists to overuse workers’ labor value unnecessarily. Not
…show more content…

Started in Paris, Humanization improves the landscape, streets, utilities etc of the city. As a result, Engels points out that under the influence of Haussmannization from France, other capitalists from Europe also exercised such method to achieve their personal enrichment. To understand how capitalism works with Haussmannization, Engels (1887) explains by saying that the expansion of modern cities provides sections of land, and buildings erected in areas where the land value is depressed must be simply replaced by others. However, if the land and building value go up, the price to live in the city increases as well.[2] As a building inside the city depreciates, the land value also goes down. Therefore, the working class will be able to live there cheaply at the beginning. Eventually, the buildings depreciate at a certain level that the capitalists decide to tear them down and build the new ones. Corresponded with Haussmannization, old buildings inside the center of the city must be removed and replaced by newer models. After remodeling the buildings, the land values increase and the capitalists once again become

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    sosc1140 essay 2

    • 1294 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Capitalism is the most productive economic system that ever exists. Its emergence and development have brought an amazingly rapid increase in productivity. However, the fact that cyclical capitalist economic crisis arises proves that capitalism does not make sense because it has contradictions in it. In this article, I am going to provide explanations about what Engels means by historical materialism, the fundamental contradiction in capitalism and two other contradictions that arise from this contradiction. And I will conclude by explaining Engels’ s anticipation of the eventual outcome of the historical development of capitalism. My main argument is that the fundamental contradiction in capitalism is the contradiction between social production and individual appropriation which leads to the contradiction between the systematic organization of production inside factories and the disorganization of production in society as a whole and the contradiction between the mode of production and the mode of exchange, and the contradiction between market and production (Frederick 295; Frederick 299; Frederick 302).…

    • 1294 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    This essay will be firstly looking at what Engels means by exploring historical materialism. I will implement what it is and show how it changed the feudal society. I will show how it connects to alienation, capital, and the individual production and individual appropriation. Second I will be touching on the advancement of technology and private ownership of production in regards to the fundamental contradictions in capitalism and I will explain how the contradictions came about. Third I will be explaining the two contradictions that arise from the fundamental contradiction, some of the things I will consider are the means of production and the mode of production. Lastly, I will show what Engels envisions as the ultimate outcome of the historical development of capitalism.…

    • 1348 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gentrification, when wealthy individuals buy and renovate houses in poor neighborhoods, a word often associated with the displacement of poor residents of run-down urban neighborhoods. Gentrification has its pro’s and con’s, so naturally the supporters list the positives, while non-supporters do the opposite. In “Go Forth and Gentrify?” by Dashka Slater, the author explores the positives of gentrification for the community, newcomers, and longtime residents. Dashka Slater, a journalist who often appears in the New York Times, Sierra, and San Francisco Magazine. Mother Jones, a liberal magazine, published “Go Forth and Gentrify” in July 2007 encouraging home buyers to buy houses in poor urban neighborhoods. During this time housing prices were decreasing and the housing bubble was about to burst. Many families lost their homes to foreclosure and had nowhere to go. As a suggestion, Slater urges readers that it is alright to move into a poor neighborhood because the home buyer will positively impact the neighborhood.…

    • 887 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    In the books introduction, Engels, one of the manifesto’s co-authors, defines the bourgeoisie as the class of the capitalist who controls means of production in society. Likewise, he considers the proletariat to be the working majority, which sells its labor to support a system it has no control over (7). Marx, on the other hand, works to apply moral judgments to these two classes, allowing for him to write on more than just a class struggle. His bourgeoisie is exploitative, manipulative, and inherently evil, while he sees the proletariat as the masses destined to rule itself (10, 17) .…

    • 1485 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    They thought that as the working classes grew more aware of the exploitation that they suffered from the upper classes they would rise up and as feudalism was replaced by capitalism, that communism would replace capitalism. Karl Marx and Frederick Engels also argued that capitalism is associated with the unfair distribution of wealth and power; a tendency toward market monopoly.…

    • 528 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Palladio Vs Blackmar

    • 1454 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The ambition to maximize profit alters the physical landscape and creates capital. The creation of capital—money, goods, or services—generates cities, roads, canals, and buildings that interconnect people. The nature of capitalism distributes capital unequally. When one person gains value, another person must lose value. A natural hierarchy in society develops where the top tiers consists of those who have amassed capital, while those with little capital comprise the bottom tiers. The abstract concept of rich and poor must manifest itself into some form of physical reality. A theme exists throughout many historians’ works on the development of cities; owners of the most capital constructed artificial barriers to separate themselves from those…

    • 1454 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    United State Labor History

    • 1563 Words
    • 7 Pages

    When one considers the effect that the Industrial Revolutions of the 19th and early 20th century, the workers whose backs bore it are seldom reflected upon. It becomes ponderous whether the revolution was a boon or a malediction upon the working class and if they were truly aided by the great rise in standard of living that hallmarked this time. Those who would defend the period would cite pre-Industrialization scenarios, toiling under feudal lords with no future beyond death and an unmarked grave. An opponent of this idea, such as the renowned Karl Marx, would state, 'The modern bourgeois society that has sprouted from the ruins of feudal society has not done away with class antagonisms. It has but established new classes, new conditions of oppression, and new forms of struggle in place of the old ones.…

    • 1563 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Karl Marx’s philosophy has been the subject of so much judgement and Scrutiny on if his beliefs will truly save the working man. The bourgeois interlocutor believe Marx’s belief would be more detrimental to the people as a whole. They believe that by wishing to abolish private property, communism will become a danger to freedom and eventual end up destroying the very base of all personal freedom, activity, and independence. Marx responds to these comments by stating that wage labor does not create any property when considering the laborers affairs. It only creates capital, a property which works only to increase the social injustice of the worker. This property called capital, is based on class antagonism. Having linked private property…

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Relationships in the 1600

    • 1122 Words
    • 5 Pages

    My essay is over Male and Female relationships during the 16th century. In my essay I will be able to tell you what their relationship is based on, How the relationship works, and I will compare some characters from the story Hamlet in my essay also. This essay is full of facts so sit back and enjoy the ride!…

    • 1122 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The growing debate of the nation is whether or not gentrification is the right move for American cities or not. The process of gentrification is all about modernizing cities with tall skyscrapers and expensive housing in order to repopulate inner cities with a bit of wealth (Piiparinen 342). In other words,gentrification is a social program for urban renewal. There are economic benefits for corporations, property owners, and the government. On the other hand, there are setbacks for minorities, and the lower and middle working class citizens. In the process of gentrification, cities become full of upper middle class white Americans, as most of the minorities leave for cheaper housing (Short 300). There are economic benefits of gentrification, but there are also some significant drawbacks. The decision to be made is whether or not gentrification will be prosperous or tear cities apart.…

    • 657 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Beginning in the 1960s, middle and upper class populations began moving out of the suburbs and back into urban areas. At first, this revitalization of urban areas was "treated as a ‘back to the city' movement of suburbanites, but recent research has shown it to be a much more complicated phenomenon" (Schwirian 96). This phenomenon was coined "gentrification" by researcher Ruth Glass in 1964 to describe the residential movement of middle-class people into low-income areas of London (Zukin 131). More specifically, gentrification is the renovation of previously poor urban dwellings, typically into condominiums, aimed at upper and middle class professionals. Since the 1960s, gentrification has appeared in large cities such as Washington D.C., San Francisco, and New York. This trend among typically young, white, upper-middle class working professionals back into the city has caused much controversy (Schwirian 96). The arguments for and against gentrification will be examined in this paper.…

    • 1865 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Myth Of Gentrification

    • 1019 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The article, “The Myth of Gentrification: It’s extremely rare and not as bad for the poor as you think” by John Butin, focuses on the positive aspects of remodeling low income neighborhoods. Butin begins the article by stating two facts. Butin believes that popular cities in New York started the trend of gentrification by introducing an upscale vibe to rundown low income neighborhoods. Butin informs the reader how it seemingly started to spread to other states. He describes most peoples’ view with gentrification. Most people believe that gentrification is a displacement of poor people and making the neighborhood inhabitable to those with low wages. Butin states that the goal of gentrification is to change low-income neighborhood into high-income…

    • 1019 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Many of our ancestors have arrived to this nation with aspirations of living a life of success. Indeed this is the land of the free and the home of the brave but according to gentrification, which is the removal of lower class citizens through property renewal, the increase in cost of living and demographic shifts, it feels as if we are living in the exact opposite. Gentrification indeed has had some advantages but overall it has led to the increase of the homeless population, the loss of culture, and other social issues. Although in this day of age, gentrification maybe impossible to prevent since capitalism is what move us, regulations should be enforced to diminish this demon.(Watt)…

    • 1827 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Living in a neighborhood of color wherein there is no preference for people with low income, represents a socio-historic process where rising housing costs, public policy, persistent segregation, and racial animus facilitates the influx of violence between black and white menace as a results of residential displacement which is otherwise refer to as gentrification. This has however deprived many citizens of the United States, a good quality of life as it boils down to an argumentative issue between the rich and the poor balance of standard of living. American’s extinction is not necessarily the amount or kind of violence that characterizes our history,” Richard Slotkin writes, “but the…

    • 1820 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There has been much debate about the impact of industrialization on the working class. The optimists have pointed to the long-term effects of industrialization. Pessimists have emphasized the fact that improvements did not appear for several decades after the beginning of industrialization. Contemporary critics such as Friedrich Engels accused industrial capitalists of robbing the workers of their just wages. Social philosopher Karl Marx used Engels' critique to call for workers to revolt and seize control of the means of production.…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays