The court ruled that the writing, Gitlow, was not protected by the Free Speech Clause since this specific press was a form of sedition. Additionally, the court ruled that freedoms of speech and press apply to both state and national government. From this case the “dangerous tendency” test was created, or the rationale of the majority, which allows
The court ruled that the writing, Gitlow, was not protected by the Free Speech Clause since this specific press was a form of sedition. Additionally, the court ruled that freedoms of speech and press apply to both state and national government. From this case the “dangerous tendency” test was created, or the rationale of the majority, which allows