If the safety one’s self is more important than somebody else’s, then there’s something incorrect about this amendment. If those who are unable to posses a gun can be promised to have the same safety as one who does, then the world can play fair. And it is possible; as James Stancliffe says in his essay: Gun Act As a Force Multiplier, Endangering Everyone, Stancliffe states that “Many other European nations, along with other countries, such as Australia, New Zealand and Canada, have implemented some degree of gun control”(185) and that in Britain, most police officers do not even carry guns.
Overall, I do believe that gun control needs to be enforced a bit more in the States. Though guns do give some sort of protection to us beings, they do not promise protection for those who do not own guns. Guns can be accidentally misused and injure, possibly kill people, and can do more harm than protection. So if anything, I would like to go along like the other countries like Britain, and Australia, and go gunless. If they can do it, we