Preview

We Need Stricter Gun Control Laws

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
969 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
We Need Stricter Gun Control Laws
Do not attack the weapon, instead, attack on the person who used the weapon. A weapons purpose is to defend oneself. It is the decision of the behind the gun whether they use it for protection or for harm.Citizens should not be banned from guns because it takes away their right to the second amendment. The gun is not the thing hurting people, it’s all about the intention behind the gun.
Many citizens have questions about guns and how they are beneficial to our society or what would happen if the ban was put in place. There are plenty of examples the guns are beneficial to the safety of our family and the general public and what would happen if the ban was set.. “When uniform police are there, the killers wait for the police to leave the area
…show more content…

We have freedom and rights that no one can mess with, unless the government bans guns. “The second Amendment to the constitution is limited to protecting the state militia’ right to bear arms” (Buckley1). If we ban our citizens guns then we are violating their right to the second amendment. We will being restricting a form of freedom for them. “The basic right of the american citizen is to bear arms, whether to kill game, or to wound and kill human beings bent on murder or rape” (Buckley1). The right to bear arms is important because of this reason. We can hunt and we can protect our people, without that right the criminals would have the advantage not, not the citizens. “Our founding fathers saw guns to be such an important line of defense…” (Chadduck1). This is why the Second Amendment was made. It is the right of an american citizen to keep a gun for safety reasons. Gun were made to harm the enemies targeting us, so do not take that away from the …show more content…

That has been their main purpose ever since they were created. “Banning guns will not stop criminals from obtaining them” (Chadduck1). If we get our guns taken away then the criminals will get the upper hand. Criminals will always have a way of obtaining them no matter what the law says. The law is are just rules that the citizens choose to follow, if you do not, then consequences strike. “A criminal is less likely to target someone who is packing” (Chadduck1). The person carrying a gun has a less likely chance of being attacked by a criminal. There is proof right there that guns protect and prevent attacks. No matter what people think, it protects and everyone knows it. “YOu cannot always count on a cops of being there” (Chadduck1). The banning of guns means someone else has to protect us. Cops are not the fastest people in the world, they are unreliable in the moment of an attack unless they are

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    This is also supported by the U.S. Supreme Court which said, “The Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home.” This quote shows how altering the laws would be the opposite of what the Second Amendment states. Also according to the Declaration of Independence, our unalienable rights are, life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, and, “that whenever any form of Government becomes destructive of these ends it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it... it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.” This means that whenever we are in perilous situation we can defend ourselves to secure our right of life. Also, “banning guns will take away yet another piece of our liberty,” according to balancedpolitics.org. Eventually this will lead to having more of our rights taken away and result in tyranny. This is why we must not alter the gun laws we have…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Banning a complete class of guns is unconstitutional (District of Columbia v. Heller). Perhaps people should ask why there are mass shootings since they appear to have only occurred after WW II. That is about the time politicians began restricting gun ownership and use. No matter where you stand on the issue, the controversy will be over how much control the state or nation may have over what is determined to be a Constitutional right. As I continue to contemplate the matter, I continue to question whether or not the Second Amendment causes more harm than good.…

    • 1215 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In fact, the FBI has released statistics that show that more people are killed by weapons other that guns, such as clubs and hammers. (Stand) If you think that banning guns will take them out of the hands of criminals, you’re mistaken. It has been proven that criminals don’t obey the rules that our society has put into place. They will get their hands on them through the black market, and then because we banned guns law abiding citizens will be defenseless. Imagine this scenario. You’re at Whataburger, a restaurant that has banned guns, enjoying a nice burger with your best friend. You look up from your conversation, and a man has walked in. He is wearing a black ski mask, and your stomach drops. He has an illegal gun, and it’s pointed right at you. “Hands up!” He shouts. No one moves in your defense, they just comply with the masked man’s order. The good people have left their weapons in the car, or at home to respect the company’s decision to have a gun free zone. You’re left at the mercy of this stranger, whose intentions are quite clear. Now imagine if the company hadn’t banned guns in their restaurant. That man sitting in the corner booth has his concealed handgun license, and could’ve stopped the crime as soon as the masked man had walked in. “You can’t blame an inanimate object that’s availability has absolutely no correlation to murder and expect it to end violence.”…

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The main idea of stricter gun control is to deter crime rates, but doing this could potentially increase crime rates instead. Not allowing law abiding citizens to own guns will leave them defenseless to criminals that still have access to illegal guns. If criminals know that citizens no longer have guns to protect themselves, they are more likely to attempt that crime on them thus increasing crime rates. According to the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC), “Global Study on Homicide,”…

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Gun control laws need to be changed. They are very inadequate and unstable in many ways. Citizens are buying weapons and ammunition that they are not mentally suited for and don't have good intentions to use the equipment.…

    • 228 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Anit-Gun Control

    • 1769 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The gun control debate is more than just a two-sided argument about whether guns should be legal or banned. The right of the people to keep and bear arms is not limited to what restrictions the government places on its people. Throughout history governments have used gun control to overpower its citizens for example, Hitler and Nazi Germany imposed very strict gun laws. Self-defense is one of the biggest reasons people are opposed to gun control. With the amount of violence in the United States today there is a reason to want to maintain that right. It is believed that disarming citizens would prevent crimes but criminals would still find a way to break the law. However, there are more options to disarm criminals, without taking the citizens rights away.…

    • 1769 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Government assumes that if society confines gun control that criminal activity will be reduced, however, offenders generally aim for victims who are unarmed. This would make it effortless for the criminal to assault a bystander while it leaves the victim vulnerable.Controlling weapons will not keep them out of felon’s hands. Each individual has the entitlement to protect themselves against unjustified acts. Righteous residents would have a sense of security knowing that firearms could be carried legally for his or her own protection and safety. A decrease in rifle sales, along with ammunition, will damage a state’s economy. Aside from criminal abuse, firearms are valued for friendly competitions and hunting purposes. Individuals who possess guns are put to a challenge to see if they can handle true responsibility. Besides regulating firearms completely, there are other alternatives to resolve gun…

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Gun Safety has been a big topic that people are speaking of all the time. The Second Amendment says that citizens have the right to bear arms. That amendment was created for militias as America had become free and they didn’t want any surprise attacks from Britain incase they tried to take America back, now America and Britain are close allies. Everyday on the news there’s always a shooting and maybe it’s because guns are easy to access. I do not think that civilians need guns. Now some might argue that the police are corrupt and that they don’t want to rely on the police to do something that they can handle but that is their job. If guns are banned than their needs to be higher protection against smuggling as criminals will obviously not…

    • 240 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The debate over the restrictions of gun control is centered on the Second Amendment to the Constitution, which gives people the right to bear arms. Gun control supporters believe that this explicit right does not extend to ownership of military-style firearms. For example, groups like the National Rifle Association argue that gun control infringes on the constitutional rights of law-abiding citizens. Gun control is an on-going debate because each year more people are killed by the use of guns. However, guns are not the result in the number of homicides each year, the problems rests with the irresponsible gun users. Gun Control would do nothing but harm America because guns offer protection and security…

    • 1203 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gun control laws give too much power to the government and may result in government tyranny and the government taking away all guns from citizens. Many people consider that gun control laws can give too much power to the government over the people. That is why our Founding Fathers wrote the Second Amendment. They had lived under the tyranny of King George and they wanted to make sure that free people in this new country would never be subjugated again and have to live under…

    • 621 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Guns do a lot of bad, but do a lot more good for society. Banning guns will not stop the problem, but will just make it worse. Guns are apart of our society as Americans they have been around since colonial years, and are not leaving anytime soon. “The number of guns in America has increased by more than 50 percent since 1993, and in that same period the gun homicide rate in the United States has dropped by half. (Kristof, The Times).” Guns offer protection for individuals. One day you could be in the wrong place at the wrong time, and a shooting breaks out, you will pray there is someone else there with a concealed firearm to help control the situation while waiting for police to arrive. They can’t do that if guns are banned. “We need to understand that we cannot stop crimes and murders. And banning guns would be a step, or two, backwards instead of moving forward in the right direction (The Times News).” The research conducted to produce this paper was drawn from a multitude of sources all with different…

    • 1133 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gun Control Paper

    • 1134 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Gun control is a very large problem going on in the United States today. All guns have the potential to be dangerous and should be used with precautions, as well as the right safety regulations. Guns can be hazardous and tragic accidents can happen, like the Sandy Hook shooting in Connecticut, but only if they are in the hands of the wrong person. Guns are not only used every day for protection, such as law enforcement like the military and the police, but guns are also used for recreational activities such as hunting. The second amendment states that we have the right to bear arms, which also means we have the right to own a gun to protect ourselves and our families not only from criminals, but also from the government. So therefore the prohibition of guns or stricter laws on gun control is unconstitutional and not morally correct. I believe gun control in the United States should not necessarily be eliminated, but reduced greatly.…

    • 1134 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why Guns Should Be Banned

    • 667 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The first reason that guns should be banned for ordinary citizens is that guns are the sign of violence. Guns are made for killing and harming other human beings. In many states there are “Shoot First” laws that allow people to defend themselves in public using guns with no duty to retreat. The Shoot First law can be dangerous to other people who are present in the area and people can get injured and killed. Why should governments allow people to own and carry guns in the name of protection? When there are law and police in a country people do not…

    • 667 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Americans have a natural right with the Second amendment. Nelson Lund, a Professor at George Mason University School of Law, once stated how, “The right to self-defense and to the means of defending oneself is a basic natural right that grows out of the right to life and many gun control laws interfere with the ability of law-abiding citizens to defend themselves against violent criminals” (Gun Control - ProCon). People have a right to safety, and a right to defend themselves. Many citizens acknowledge and defend this right. By implements stricter gun laws the only thing being done is taking away some people's ability to defend themselves against others who won't follow any laws put into place. This walks hand in hand with the second amendment, which “protects an individual’s right to own guns” and states that guns are needed for self-defense from threats ranging from local criminals to foreign invaders. Along with the fact that gun ownership deters crime rather than causes more crime (Second Amendment). America was built upon freedom, freedom of religion, freedom of speech, and even the freedom to own guns and protect oneself from whomever may pose a threat. Bad people with guns can only be fought against by good people with the same abilities to have guns. Along with this the Fourteenth Amendment incorporates the fundamental right to keep and bear arms for the purpose of self-defense (Second Amendment). The second amendment is not the only amendment that protects a humans right to bear arms, here are other amendments this country was built upon that protect an american's right to protect…

    • 1798 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays