Preview

From A Christian Perspective Why Did Communism Fail

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
395 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
From A Christian Perspective Why Did Communism Fail
ECON 214- D03
Christian Ethics Project 2
1. From a Christian perspective, why did Marxist communism fail?

From a Christian perspective, Marxist communism failed because of the atheistic qualities. Marxist communism didn’t allow people to practice their religious beliefs. Marx’s social system also wouldn’t allow people to take home their own earnings, making everyone have the same earnings, wiping out inequality (Stapleford, 2009, p. 62). “The weakening of property rights for the rich or the talented also endangers the property right of the remainder of society and undermines economic growth” (Stapleford, 2009, p. 62). The lack of economic growth is ultimately what led to Marxist communism failing.

2. Which is a more Christian form of government,


You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    He established that the United States would provide political, military and economic assistance to all democratic nations under threat from external or internal authoritarian forces.…

    • 900 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    From a Christian perspective Marxist communism failed because it denied anything and everything about God or there even being any type of god. There was a real sense of atheistic aspects with in Marxist communism. As a Christian we know that anything without God means nothing at all and will end up failing miserably. Marxism was very controlling when it came to religious beliefs of any type. They closely monitored and control anything religious which didn’t sit well with the people and pushed people to resist the rules. According to Stapleford, “Certainly communism, except in recalcitrant Cuba and North Korea, is dead” (2009, page…

    • 731 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marx’s plan for reforming society may be more tangible than Kuyper’s, but his plan uses rather cruel and destructive tactics. For instance, Marx believes that the family has become an instrument of oppression and should be eliminated. Marx’s plan for consolidating the family directly contradicts biblical principles and is no less than an attempt to undermine God’s authority. Marx believes the family is merely a product of the class system and not a God ordained institution. Besides Marx’s cruel elimination of the family, his plan further feeds man’s greed and selfishness. Communism’s prohibition of private property claims to produce economic equality. However, this notion seems only to further feed man unhealthy relationship with the material world and denies God his rightful place of power. Without God’s moral authority, man is left to reshape society as he sees fit but at the cost of losing all that is good. After examining Marx argument, the idea of communism does not seem to present an effective solution for resolving poverty in either Marx’s day or in the twenty-first…

    • 897 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Suetonius is well known for his major historical work entitled The Twelve Caesars in which he analyzes the lives of twelve Roman emperors starting with Julius Caesar and ending with Domitian. The Twelve Caesars is considered to be an accurate and reliable primary source; however, it is a little bit biased in the sense that Suetonius is not always impartial in his assessments of the Roman emperors. It seems that Suetonius gives very good treatment to those emperors that he likes and very harsh treatment to those emperors that he dislikes, which says quite a lot about his integrity as a historian. For example, as is mentioned…

    • 1565 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the primary principles of communist is that capitalism is characteristically awful and represented a risk to the common laborers. Meanwhile, “The capitalists believed there should be a free economy in which private individuals made most decisions” (Brookioh, 2012). The communists see every single entrepreneur country as conceivable foes. As indicated by them, capitalism will in the end crush itself and it is their obligation to help it along. They deny participation amongst themselves and capitalist countries ideologically.…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dear Doug Research Paper

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The difference in Marxism is the ideology of dialectical materialism, which says you have a thesis which is met with and antithesis to form a synthesis, which becomes the new thesis and it is met with another antithesis, and this process continues until a utopia is reached. A utopia is a state of life in which everything is perfect. Regular atheistic materialism is that matter is the sole reality and all things, beings and processes can be explained through science. Marxism’s basis for morality is anything for the prosper of the state and that might sound like an absolute because it is the overall goal the worldview, but each government that implements communism has different rules and regulations based upon the leader. Marxists tend to learn toward aggression, force, and lying for promotion of the…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    * Marxists Disagree: Religion functions serve capitalism. Karl Marx – sees religion as an ideology that is used as a weapon by the ruling class to justify suffering of poor as ‘god-given’…

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Reading about Christianity, it seems that the early Christians did not believe in capitalism. In today’s society however, they support capitalism and it currently pushes our government and economy. I mean I guess if you believe strong enough in let’s say hell, then it could in a way boost the economy. This is what I am thinking. I am sure that religion reduces crime and corruption and those Christians who abide by the book probably respect the laws of the land. With that increase in respect, it could boost overall economic growth. I have gone into establishments where people have used their religious background to define their reliability. If you think about it, there are more verses on money and finance than there is about prayer in the Bible. But the New Testament has contradictions to this. It states that the rich person has little chance getting into heaven but then states the parable of the talents, which praises the servant who got the biggest return on his money. That alone could solidify why modern day Christians support capitalism. Even more so why our government is run the way it is. Religion creates bonds of trust and shared commitment among small groups, both of which is necessary qualities for lending and trade. Religion can directly affect what you earn. Some followers under Christianity have bigger families and give away more of their money. They also tend to have lower savings rate and incomes like Quakers or the Amish. With all this moving money, it is no doubt why Christians could have a huge impact on economic…

    • 287 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kuyper Perspective Although several of his augments complimentary to Kuyper’s, Marx’s methods for ending poverty are extremely different. Marx views the French Revolution as a positive event and advocates the distribution of property and the abolishment of the family structure. These radical ideas suggest that he possesses a distorted understanding of human nature. Moreover, Marx’s Communism completely disregards God’s authority and places man’s reason at the center of his worldview. Christians should abstain from embracing these ideas as they are based primarily on scientific reasoning without the support of biblical principles.…

    • 1168 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Example of Db Post

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1. From a Christian perspective, why did Marxist communism fail? From a Christian point of view, Marxist communism failed due to people not being offered a choice of whether or not to distribute riches to everyone. The author states: “Beginning in the Garden, God gave men and women the freedom to choose to do what is right. This is the heart of democracy” (Stapleford, 2009, p.98). Clearly, it is Godly for people to have freedom of choice; communism was not Godly and therefore, failed.…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Communism is a type of socialism and socialism is based around the idea of the states being owner of their means of production. Communism is based upon the ideology of Marxism. Marxism criticized Christianity by claiming that it was untrue because it took the side of the wealthy oppressors (Shelley 2008). The movement that we know as communism today was started by Vladimir Ilich Ulyanov know as Lenin. Lenin believed that violence was Marxism’s ultimate weapon (Shelley 2008). The theory that came from these two men’s ideas coming together was the Marxist-Leninist theory which claimed “Christianity is an illusory reflection of the world resulting from class divisions” (Shelley 2008). Communism was about not letting society become classless because Lenin believed that religion would take away the power of government and to him that could not…

    • 1021 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This sets the idea that capitalism was directly affected by religion in the past, and without religion, capitalism may not have taken over in the way it has in the modern United States.…

    • 657 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Marx and Kuyper both strive to see a solution to poverty. Marx believes that society needs to be centralized through a government that will equally distribute capital to each person. Kuyper believes that society needs to centralize around God. Both men agree that society needs to be centralized and that the separation between the two ideas comes from their religions. “But Communism abolishes eternal truths, it abolishes, all religion, and all morality, instead of constituting them on a new basis: it therefore acts in contradiction to all past historical experience” (Marx, 33-34). The argument Marx makes for communism is that it erases all faith in humanity and relies on government to be the solution to the problem of poverty. Kuyper believing that the sinful nature of mankind is to blame sees the solution being in the power of the people and a reformation in religious thought. No matter the government in charge, Kuyper argues “Rules alone will not cure our sick society; the medicine must also reach the heart of rich and poor” (Kuyper,…

    • 1067 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Communism In 1930s

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Communism (Marxism) swept the world in the 1900s by being an 'easy fix' for a struggling economic country. It gives everyone a job, the same things (food, money, and necessities), and most importantly: no power. (Johnson, 2005) Communism basically dehumanizes the country. No one is an individual.…

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Commanding Heights Essay

    • 7534 Words
    • 31 Pages

    Lenin’s hardcore Communist policies were a disaster in the USSR: Food production and industrial output virtually collapsed and the county started falling apart. He had to abandon the most extreme Communist practices early on because they just didn’t work in real life.…

    • 7534 Words
    • 31 Pages
    Good Essays