Preview

Garrett Hardin Lifeboat Ethics

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
692 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Garrett Hardin Lifeboat Ethics
Garrett Hardin, a professor at the University of California, wrote the article Lifeboat Ethics: The Case Against Helping the Poor. Hardin believed the government was using magnificent amounts of resources to help the needy, and the population of poor communities was increasing more rapidly than the rich communities. He thought helping the poor was a waste of recourses that the government could save for future generation. During Hardin’s article, there was a metaphor that was used constantly. The metaphor was similar to the metaphor about the Spaceship Earth model used by environmentalist. Garrett Hardin used the Lifeboat Ethics metaphor which explained to his readers, the individuals on the lifeboat, surrounded by miles of water, was the rich, and the ones swimming around the lifeboat seeking help was the poor. The lifeboats had a capacity of sixty people, there were currently fifty rich individuals on the lifeboat, and so ten members of the one hundred poor individuals swimming could receive the chance to safety. Hardin (1974) stated, …show more content…
We could let just ten come afloat, but how would you choose which ten comes to safety? We could leave all one hundred and save our safety factor so we will have room for any catastrophe that may happen within the fifty on the life boat” (p.779).
By this metaphor, Hardin was trying to explain the increasing numbers of poor individuals than rich. If the poor increase more and more over time and the rich only increase some over time, the government will be using a lot more resources (the Food Bank), which could result in a worldwide

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    How Durning and Skinner Proved That Hardin’s Lifeboat Ethics: The Case Against Helping the Poor Does Not Float…

    • 1468 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    PHI 208 Week 2 assignment

    • 1300 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In Peter Singer’s 1972 post titled “Famine, Affluence and Morality”, he conveys that wealthy nations, for example the United States, has an ethical duty to contribute much a lot more than we do with regards to worldwide assistance for famine relief and/or other disasters or calamities which may happen. In this document, I will describe Singers objective in his work and give his argument with regards to this problem. I will describe 3 counter-arguments to Singer’s view which he tackles, and after that reveal Singer’s reactions to those counter-arguments. I will explain Singer’s idea of marginal utility and also differentiate how it pertains to his argument. I will compare how the ideas of duty and charity alter in his suggested world. To conclude, I will provide my own reaction about this problem supporting singer’s argument. Should wealthier nations have a moral duty to relieve poorer nations if a disastrous event were to happen? I think that we all must contribute in times of need even if this means substantially modifying the way in which we live for the objective of assisting other people so long as it doesn't cause us to suffer.…

    • 1300 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his article “Famine, Affluence, and Morality,” Peter Singer outlines his argument for helping those in need in the global community. His main argument is that humans can stop suffering based on our moral decisions.1 Singer calls for the definition of ‘charity’ in our society to have moral implications. People should give governmental and privately. all need to give to charity and all at the same time.…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Life Boat Ethical Analysis

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Aristotle, a famous Greek philosopher, had a theory of trying to simplify the task of arguing by dividing and classifying arguments into three types. The three types are called Logos or logic-base, Pathos or emotion based, and Ethos or credibility based. The two classic essays, “Life Boat Ethics” by Garrett Hardin and “A Modest Proposal” by Johnathan Swift, the writers make good suggestions with these types of arguments over world population and world famine.…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stories of survival at sea have captured people’s curiosity and imagination throughout history. The struggles that some seafarers have faced while drifting on the open sea are remarkable. “The Open Boat” by Stephen Crane is the story of four crew members trying to survive on the open sea while in a dinghy after their ship sank. Throughout the story, Crane describes how man and nature react with one another. By his description of their reactions, Crane makes it clear that nature does not care about man’s well being.…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    I chose Lifeboat Ethics: The Case against Helping the Poor, by Garret Hardin, to analyze because, out of all the readings I have ever done for English, this particular one is by far the most memorable. It is also perfectly suited for my argument, because it is appropriately as offensive as it is logical. The essay, in short, is a rhetorical argument that claims that helping the poor or unfortunate people of the world-though it is considered the “right” thing to do- is, in actuality, harmful to the very future of our species. The actual message of the essay, however, is not what I want to endorse. When this essay was assigned to my class junior year,…

    • 2561 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Survival is a key part of life in which humans have been attending to throughout our entire existence. As time progresses, technology and knowledge not only increases but also improves. Eventually, we develop to the point where our educational system has an important and crucial question where the students are asked to compare and contrast a life raft with emergency supplies in it, a moderately sized island, and Earth itself. The three subjects have a number of similarities and differences; however, some are obviously more important than others.…

    • 526 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    After reading “As a Weapon in The Hands of The Restless Poor” one can feel motivated to help those in need. Earl Shorris appeals to emotion when he talks about creating a program to start to make a difference in the lives of the less fortunate. He starts out the story to say he is writing a book which makes him an author which is an example of ethos because he seems reliable. Shorris then states that the poor have been “Cheated” which is substantially true because the rich were given the opportunity to succeed more as someone who is poor and cannot even afford to feed themselves. In order to help the less fortunate out he has to create a program to help the poor succeed. After a Rhetorical analysis of “As a Weapon in The Hands of The Restless Poor” by Earl Shorris one can conclude that most people take for granted even the little things in life, if one were to open their eyes and see there are many people who do not have a dollar to their name, and we have so much that we tend to lose focus on helping the less fortunate succeed in the world we live in today.…

    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Peter Singer’s “Famine, Affluence, and Morality,” he argues that when people abroad are suffering or dying from lack of food, shelter or medicine, it is wrong for people here to spend money on morally unimportant things rather than giving money to help (Hughes). This means that we have a moral obligation to do what we can to alleviate the stress of poverty abroad if it does not do any harm to us helping them. If we are able to benefit people abroad, we should do so. Food, shelter, and quality healthcare are things that should be seen as basic necessities; therefore, not only do we have a moral obligation to help those abroad in need, but we should also have the want to help those in need. Although Singer asserts this claim, he does identify…

    • 1359 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Do onto others as you would have them do onto you, the golden rule Christians follow in their day to day lives. In Garrett Hardin’s “Lifeboat Ethics: The Case Against Helping the Poor” Hardin asks us to think of the world as a life boat with limited space. Many feel guilty for their spot on the life boat due to their personal views or society. “The U.S population increases .8 every year while the other countries increase at a rate of 3.3 per year.” Each country is responsible for its own well being, the poorly managed countries will suffer but learn from experience. “The poor population increases 2.5% yearly while the middle class and upper class population increases at only .6% annually.” This being said the poor population will continue to grow at about four times that of the middle and upper class populations. Some believe just giving to the poor will help solve the problem but what happens when the next generation expects a handout? Why do we not help get these…

    • 1453 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Boat of Ethics

    • 1058 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Ecology, most simply put, is "the study of relationships between organisms and their environment". (Encyclopedia Britannica) Garrett Hardin, writer of the essay Lifeboat Ethics: The Case against Helping the Poor was a professor of human ecology at the University of California at Santa Barbara and had some extremely harsh opinions about the solution to global population issues. As a professor of human ecology, Hardin studied the relationship between humans and their environment, and in this case the entire globe. It is a well known fact that environmental degradations, unequal wealth distribution and exponential population growth are growing problems in the world, and in his essay, Hardin explains that there are relatively simple solutions to these problems. While Hardin's solutions to the interconnected global environment, economic and population problems are harsh and potentially immoral, Hardin convinced me they are the only solutions to a growing global issue.…

    • 1058 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Lifeboat Ethics Essay

    • 665 Words
    • 3 Pages

    because in lifeboat Ethics by garrett hardin say¨A wise and competent government saves out of the production of the good years in anticipation of bad years to come’’ he agree on that people should solve their own problem not form other people,because next time they can help there own people their people will feel more tures there government it can have better future and then they can learn then they will know the knowledge of population and stop people want have more children the poor nation want have more children in the text¨india, for…

    • 665 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    White Trash In America

    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The thought that no matter what there are poor people, just as there is always going to be the rich. In order to fully grasp this concept it is important to remember don't classify these individuals. The rich and the poor were both created by the same man,(God) with intentions to be equal. With the work of man, somewhere along the lines the difference was made and class was created. What Isenberg was saying is that regardless of the class system there will always be poor. There is no point in classifying…

    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Welfare Reform Essay

    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Hurbert Humphrey once said that the moral test of the government is how that government treats those who are in the dawn of life, the children; those who are in the twilight of life, the elderly; and those who are in the shadows of life- the sick, the needy and the handicapped. In other words, it is the government’s duty to help those in need.…

    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tragedy of the Commons

    • 619 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The tragedy of the commons is explained through an example of herdsmen being able to own as much cattle as possible, which results in herdsman wanting to maximize their gain even when there are effects of overgrazing. When each herdsman keeps adding another after another there is a tragedy because as each herdsman become ignorant of the impact of overgrazing and the land that is use to other herdsman declines. Another example is overfishing in the oceans. Fishermen catch fish highly for their own gain each day unaware that they are possibly causing extinction. Hardin also presents that there is a tragedy of the freedom to breed. He explains that it is intolerable because people will continue to have many children for their own interest, causing overpopulation.…

    • 619 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays