Preview

Gay Marriage

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
624 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Gay Marriage
Research Draft Paper: Gay Marriage
Ronnie Johnson
Introduction to Ethics and Social Responsibility
Instructor: Christopher Myers
May 21, 2013

Gay marriage has been the subject of debate for centuries in different areas all over the world. Today, in America, the decision to legalize gay marriage is being debated in each state. To date, there are twelve states that have approved gay marriages; among them are New York, Connecticut, California and more. Many people are against gay marriage because the Bible and other religious books states that marriage is between a man and a woman in order to have children but I believe gay marriage should be legal everywhere. Lesbian, gay, heterosexual or transgender are all humans, and we all deserve equal rights; gay marriage does not harm anyone, individuals or society in general, so why shouldn’t gay people receive the same benefits as heterosexual couples receive?
The debate on gay marriage is usually taken back to the religious definition of what marriage is. However, if we are to apply the utilitarian principle of ethics to this situation, how would it rule? I would have to say the utilitarian act would be to choose legalizing gay marriage. Choosing to vote for gay marriage produces the best results for the greatest number affected by that choice. Even if there are more people against gay marriage than there are people for gay marriage, the people against gay marriage are not really affected at all. Honestly, it is unclear to me why so many people fight so hard against something that is not harming anyone in any way. In this particular situation, the utilitarian rule will benefit gay people in the pursuit of equality.
Most of the people who fight against gay marriage are considered to be emotivists, in my opinion. Times have drastically changed and it has become more apparent that there are more reasons to allow gay marriage than there are to fight against it. “It’s Remarkable not only how public opinion has recently



References: Blessing gay marriage. (2013, Mar 20). The Christian Century, 130, 7-7. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/1324430987?accountid=32521 Whitehead, J. C. (2011). RISK, MARRIAGE, AND NEOLIBERAL GOVERNANCE: Learning from the unwillingly excluded. Sociological Quarterly, 52(2), 293. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/868121010?accountid=32521 Taylor, V., Van Dyke, N., Kimport, K., & Andersen, E. A. (2009). Culture and mobilization: Tactical repertoires, same-sex weddings, and the impact on gay activism. American Sociological Review, 74(6), 865-890. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/218811510?accountid=32521

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Best Essays

    Coun 501

    • 4924 Words
    • 20 Pages

    Jost, K. (2003, September 5). Gay marriage. CQ Researcher, 13, 721-748. Retrieved June 22, 2010, from CQ Researcher Online, http://library.cqpress.com/cqresearcher…

    • 4924 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Gay Marriage

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Katha Pollitt on her essay called “What’s Wrong with Gay Marriage”? (Page 570), she is arguming against same-sex marriage. This subject is very controversial in all aspects. Some of the reasons are: Political, Judicial, Economical, Conservatives people, History and Religions.…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The marriage-rights movement headed by gay rights activists has been a relevant issue on the American socio-political docket since 1970 following the Stonewall riots in New York City, New York in June of 1969. The riots sparked an initiative for gay people to join the movement of other marginalized groups in a quest to counteract widespread alienation to obtain the equal treatment and recognition they deserved. Today those activists joined by a whole new generation of proud homosexuals are still fighting for the right to be able to walk down an isle and commit their minds, bodies, and souls to the one they love in front of the people they love and have it be more than an impotent symbol of affection; they want their union to be recognized both socially and legally as a different but equal lifestyle choice. They want to partake in marriage, not "marriage". The most familiar argument that we hear today in the war fought by traditionalists and activists is the argument for the purpose of marriage. Traditionalists like Rick Santorum would argue along the lines that the purpose for marriage is children. Most gay activist would argue that the purpose for marriage is finding love in a lifelong companion. In Gay Marriage: Why It Is Good For Gays, Good For Straights And Good For America, Jonathan Rauch, an openly gay male, explains how gay marriage would be a universal good. Marriage has evolved over the years “nearly beyond recognition”[1] from wealthy aristocratic polygamy used to impose socially structured dominance over women, to a business merger whose main goal was financial security for women and a pool of family ties, to an institution bent on maintaining social norms and gender specialization, to our present marriage where love, an unstable chemical reaction, is on the forefront of the reasons to marry.[2] He argues that the marriage portrait is not as distinctively black and white as some would…

    • 2792 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    WGU GLT1

    • 878 Words
    • 3 Pages

    There is growing attention to the issue of marriage equality for gay people in this country. As of the writing of this paper, 16 of the 50 states in the United States of America have legalized gay marriage, either by legislation or by popular vote (Wisniewski, 2013). The discourse regarding the issue becomes quite contentious largely because of non-secular ideology that has demonized the concept of homosexuality for many years. As a sociological issue, the conflict has become a divisive force for many, from political powers as far down to the family level. The constitution guarantees equal rights for all in this country; freedom of religion, speech, etc. yet appears to stall when equal rights for the gay community are involved. There has been significantly more popular support for the cause recently, but the stigma and prejudice continue to linger. Is this a moral debate or has an outdated ideology become so embraced by many that the battle has only just begun?…

    • 878 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A battle has been in progress for years over whether equal rights and equal protection against discrimination should be extended to homosexual unions. Recently this has expanded into the area of marriage. The topic of homosexual marriage is a topical issue. There is absolutely no legal logical or governing reason that same- sex couples cannot be wed. It’s extremely unconstitutional to refuse them the right to marry. In 2012, we still have not legalised gay marriage in Australia when countries such as Spain and South Africa have. We live in a democratic country that is about rights and freedom of choice. Besides constitutional rights there are a number of economic issues which suggests equal rights for gay people could positively affect our economy.…

    • 1153 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    jennifer t

    • 829 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Everybody should have the right to a legally recognized union with a partner of their choice. The debate over whether or not people in same sex relationship should be allowed to marry, or even enter into civil unions is no new fight. Legalizing gay marriage has brought a new trend which then providing the arguments on supporting gay marriage such as denying them is a violation of religious freedom and minority discrimination encourages people to have strong family values and constitute a good based family as well as giving up high-risk sexual lifestyles. Homosexuality is an accepted lifestyle nowadays with most evidence proving biological causation, and marriage benefits should be available to all couples.…

    • 829 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gay Marriage and Conflict

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages

    On the outside looking in, it is rather apparent that there are two objectives in regards to gay marriage; those who say “green-light” and those who say “red-light”. In essence, when you consider the marriage battle between homosexuals and heterosexuals -- it’s like fire and ice; they both have the potential to overcome each other’s privileged power. “It’s this tug of war between whose gut feeling is better or morally correct that perpetuates the cycle of bitter feelings,” suggests David Myers , a spokesperson for gay rights (Myers & Scanzoni, 2005, p. 129). When we take into consideration the lenses model, you quickly notice that you have three parties – one that is for the institution of gay marriage, one that is against it, and one that is liaison between the both (the government). Those who say “green light” for gay marriage see themselves as being “ostracized by the other parties for wanting to belong” (Myers & Scanzoni, 2005, p. 13). Rather than being avoidant, this party finds it more promising to just promote “collaboration as they find an integrative solution that will satisfy both the other parties” (Hocker & Wilmot, 2007, p. 163). Meanwhile, those who say “red light” to gay marriage either see their counterparts (the “green lighters” and the government) as unmoral tradition breaking savages (Myers & Scanzoni, 2005, p. 113). They believe in that the perfect union in marriage as that of a heterosexual bases rather than a homosexual. The government on the other hand sees itself as the crowd pleaser. They are persuaded by the vote of the masses and see their part only as one who acts accordingly to the public interest.…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Try to imagine life in a society that refuses individuals to marry who they love. Imagine people being around their partners, but not having the legal rights to call them their wives or husbands. The fact of the matter is one does not have to try to imagine this because this is the state of current society. People can argue about whether church and state should be separated, the banning of polygamy, and not legalizing gay marriage, but the major importance is the institution of love (Sullivan). Gay marriage should not be opposed, but embraced by society with joy. Gay marriage should be legalized in the United States because denying this right is unfair and unconstitutional; marriage is not about money or judgment of society, but about a couple’s love for each other, and it will help reduce or solve social problems.…

    • 968 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Critical Thinking

    • 1500 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Cited: Bennett William. “Leave Marriage Alone”. Constructing Others Constructing Ourselves. Ed. Sybille Gruber et al. Kendall/Hunt, 2002.…

    • 1500 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United States’ Declaration of Independence reads, “[We] hold these truths to be self evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness” and Abraham Lincoln in his Gettysburg Address furthers, “[the] [United States’] fathers brought forth on this continent a new nation, conceived in liberty and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal.” But in the United States today, not all are equal. Within the majority of the United States, same-sex couples cannot be married or reap the benefits of said marriage. Marriage is basic to the recognition as equals in society and any status short of this becomes inferior, unjust and unconstitutional. Our nation cannot live up to its promise of equality and the fundamental rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, until the invidious discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation is done away with. Equality under the law extends to all persons. Legalizing same-sex marriage, a recognition of basic American principles, would represent the culmination of our nation’s commitment to equal rights. Americans and those who believe and live by the words of the Declaration of Independence, Lincoln’s Gettysburg Address, the 14th Amendment, and in the Constitution’s guarantees of equal protection and equal dignity before the law cannot stand idle while this wrong continues. Any prohibitions on same-sex marriage, whatsoever, are entirely discriminatory. Gay rights are civil rights and all Americans should have the right to marry the person of their choice, regardless of their sexual orientation. Thus, same-sex marriage should be legalized in the United States.…

    • 1865 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Cited: Eskridge, William W Jr. and Darren R Spedale. Gay Marriage: For Better or For Worse. New…

    • 1276 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Gay Marriage

    • 1291 Words
    • 6 Pages

    They are no longer a small population, but a booming revolution. These groups do not hide themselves in burrows, but flamboyantly celebrate their identities. The gays are now a people willing and ready to be heard. It has come to all of our attentions that in the light of marriage they have been depraved and deceived. Homosexuals cannot allow this persecution to continue, as they are constantly forfeited equal rights. The arguments are of lifestyle differences and the legalized discrimination of these people. It encompasses same-sex marriage as a cause worth fighting and defending so that we all may be, “one Nation under God, indivisible with liberty and justice for all.”…

    • 1291 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gay Marriage Bias Essay

    • 811 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The newspaper article “One Man Guides the Fight Against Gay Marriage”, written by Erik Eckholm, explains how Frank Schubert is working against the idea of legalizing gay marriage. This source is made to inform about what Frank Schubert thinks about gay marriage and how he and other organizations are trying to prevent it from becoming legal. Eckholm is trying to convey that this battle between gay rights leaders and Schubert, along with other same-sex marriage opponents, will carry on into the…

    • 811 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Gay Marriage

    • 275 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Katha Pollitt counters arguments against marriage between homosexuals in her essay “What’s Wrong with Gay Marriage?”. I think the main purpose of this essay was to convince the reader that there is absolutely nothing wrong with gay marriages. The author starts her essay with a question because she disagrees that gay marriage threatens the so-called institution of marriage. Pollitt jumps from one argument to another and looks at the institution of marriage from various perspectives, such as history, politics, society and religion. She wonders why so many people do not treat marriage seriously, and yet deny it to gays, showing hypocrisy. She gets very emotional in the defense of gay marriage in this piece. The author then informs the reader that she does not like marriage. She argues that marriage is “not about sex, it’s about separation of church and state”.…

    • 275 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Gay Marriage

    • 2509 Words
    • 11 Pages

    The initial challenge is an ethical one. Gay couples want the same rights as heterosexual couples, and by classic reciprocity principles, this is something all citizens can understand. We would want the same thing, and thus the gay couples have the Golden Rule on their side. Two other modes of ethical analysis…

    • 2509 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics