Preview

Genetic Modification: Good or Bad

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
563 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Genetic Modification: Good or Bad
Jackson May
Mr. Duplessis
Biology I Honors/ P6
20 February 2013
Genetic Engineering Genetic engineering has a prospect of success, yet hasn’t shown many results. The only major plus to genetic engineering is insulin which helps out diabetics worldwide. Yet there are a ton of drawbacks from genetic engineering. Genetically modified foods have a possibility of creating new allergens, and cloning animals and plants would make them genetically similar creating a greater risk for disease. In my opinion, it is immoral for scientists to be able to change people’s hair color, or other cosmetic things. In Matthew 15:13, Jesus says, “Every plant that my heavenly Father has not planted will be rooted up (16 Bible Verses about Genetic Engineering).” Genetic Engineering not only has possible harmful outcomes, but, in my opinion, is morally wrong. However, I think that for health reasons genetic engineering is beneficial. For example, genetic engineering was used to produce insulin which keeps millions of American diabetics alive. Multiple times in the Bible God talks about how he knew us in the womb and he made us perfectly. I think this would also apply to today in that we should not modify our hair/eye color. God could not have addressed genetic engineering specifically in the Bible thousands of years ago, because the prophets who wrote the Bible did not have that technology available at the time.
In September of 1999, Jesse Gelsinger was treated at University of Pennsylvania for an inherited enzyme deficiency. She suffered an extreme immune reaction and died 4 days after the gene therapy treatment. After several days, the researchers still had no idea what went wrong. That is why genetic engineering should not be used for anything other than curing fatal diseases. Dr. Ray Bohlin says, “So far, few genes have only a single application in the body. Most genes are found to have multiple effects, sometimes in different tissues. Therefore, to engineer a gene for

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Just like any other medical procedures there are a variety of risks that can interfere with a successful genetic modification procedure. To begin with this procedure can result in unpredictable responses from the immune system of the embryo. Genetic modification requires the introduction of a virus into the targeted cells. This process can go wrong if the wrong cells are targeted and the virus reacts negatively with the host cells. It may cause infections that can lead to further complications. There are situations where tumors develop as a result of the genetic modification process (Mayo Clinic Therapy, 2016). All of these risks greatly undermine the viability of genetic modification, especially since a lot of trials have to be conducted before a successful modification can be made. It is highly unethical to experiment with human genes because of the reasons that these risks have on the end results. Many human beings can be subjected to avoidable medical conditions in the future because of the genetic modification practices conducted on them. In Gattaca, the human beings born outside the eugenics program were viewed as insignificant. The quest for perfection when it comes to genetic modification meant that members of the society in the film had to live with these risks to be…

    • 1404 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Genetically modified foods are beneficial for our society because of the nutrients that may be added to foods and the greater ability to produce these foods. While some people argue that genetic modification is still a new technology that should be researched further, others will agree that the benefits definitely outweigh the drawbacks. Society today has all kinds of new technology at its fingertips and should be allowed to use this technology to enhance certain things to better the world.…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Genetic Engineering has been hailed as one of the greatest scientific developments of the 21st century. The argument above is one of many, posed to ask human beings to think about whether or not genetic engineering is morally and ethically right. By modifying genes and DNA or by introducing new genes into an embryo, organisms are given new, often beneficial, characteristics. This amazing technology is used to alter the genetic material of living cells in order to make them capable of producing new substances or performing new functions. It is the procedure that allows scientists to basically change the very nature of nature. From adding jellyfish genes to mice to make them glow, to cloning sheep and creating super vegetables, the doors that have been opened and the possibilities that can be explored by this branch of science are endless.…

    • 1938 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Genetic Engineering is a notorious and complex subject, burdened with ethical and moral debates, packed with fascinating science. Everything begins with DNA, (Deoxyribonucleic acid). We are all made up of DNA. Without understanding DNA, genetic engineering or any sort of alteration within engineering of DNA is unfeasible. If you do ask someone, (what is a designer baby?), who does not know the science behind designer babies or genetic engineering, they may say it is a creation against the nature as we are dismantling natures characteristics and deciding to adjust the faults.…

    • 5533 Words
    • 23 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Human genetic engineering is the process by which the human genome is being modified and manipulated in order to remove or select certain genes. Moreover, traits that are desirable can be selected, and preventing the genetic causes of diseases is possible. Human genetic engineering, as a new field, has raised a lot of questions and ethical issues. I argue about where we should put the limits for our genetic editing. Should we just use it to prevent harmful diseases or can we carry on with the modification and choosing the desirable traits of our future generations? Who decides? Who has the right to object? I will try my best to provide reasonable answers to those questions throughout my series of blogs, based on scientific articles that talk about its controversial and ethical aspects.…

    • 255 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    When scientists begin to alter and change a person’s gene, the genes the person is born with and scientists take too much risk to change a person’s gene. Once something wrong happens anything can happen to a human maybe there will be a disease or illness and this can cause really bad effect on people, there will not be many cures or treatments for the human, they will die or get a heart attack if genes are overlaid. I believe that genetic engineering is only general; everyone knows that it comes from organisms. But it can still harm anyone because it has not been studied for a long amounts of time, its just what scientists predict, who knows maybe they can be wrong. I believe that scientists are wrong and they shouldn’t do anything, before they have fully…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    English 112 Essay

    • 1670 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In this essay, to support my standpoint, I will be using work from Rebecca Dresser, who wrote, "Genetic Modification of Preimplantation Embryos: Toward Adequate Human Research Policies." Rebecca Dresser describes current shortcomings and recommends policy actions are designed to ensure, that they must meet certain criteria for research on human modification being practiced. In addition, author, Sally Deneen's article entitled Designer People. Where she asks, Are We Changing the Nature of Nature? Richard Hayes, Genetically Modified Humans? No Thanks, the opposing viewpoint to Ronald M. Green. In addition, to the Bible and other scholars, who also feel that, human genetic modification, is unethical.…

    • 1670 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Genetic engineering is the incorporation of a new gene into another organism's genome for a certain benefit which may include treatment of diseases, manufacturing of drugs,hormones etc., and production of foods.It started in early 1900's, but scientists at that time did not practice ethics but as time went by ethical issues were addressed with the evolution of International organizations such as the United Nations. lt has been beneficiary to our society especially in the food production industries in order to feed large numbers of people through Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO),even though there will still be issues of concern on the negative side effects of these products.…

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The risk is that it could complicate many things with curing disease, but on the flip side of it, it could be very useful for those who are prone to diseases. This was a paraphrase of the writing of Danielle Simmons. Genetic engineering can present both a great boon and possible danger to the human race. Many diseases that come around when people are adults ar incurable. This is a problem but none the less can help people deal with it it they learn about it earlier. Though this may not have as much to do with Genetic Engineering but it has a very important physiological values. Another paraphrase of Danielle Simmons helping to explain the fact of adult onset…

    • 1069 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I believe that there are choices that come with a science like this. Using genetic engineering to alter people's faces, eye color , or intelligence levels is not ethical or biblical. Ephesians 2:10 states, For we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus for good works. This means that God meant to make us the way we look. Altering appearances negates God’s will. However, improving someone's quality of life for the better by removing extensive pain or suffering is God’s will. Cosmetic use of genetic engineering is an uncharted risk that could have unintended consequences ,while also bothering 83% of the population.…

    • 460 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Even though genetic engineering can have bad affects, there are many false health alarms about it also. It’s even claimed by others that these are just false health alarms, “…so many other public health false alarms, the attack on the new biotechnology – also known as bioengineering, gene splicing, or genetic engineering” (Miller and Conko, 22). This can be related to Frankenstein and how if Victor took more time to examine and study the notes he had gotten more thoroughly, he could have reduced the risks and nullified the worries about genetic engineering. Genetic engineering can be used for good if tested enough to get rid of unwanted symptoms like ADHD and other undesirable symptoms. Parents would love to have a world without ADHD and it could happen if they tried things with genetic engineering, just as Michael Lemonick from Time Magazine says, “What if parents can use pre-implantation genetic diagnosis to avoid having kids with attention-deficit…

    • 973 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Genes are basically codes or instructions that inhibit or create in organisms cells. In recent years, scientists have learned how to manipulate parts of DNA by creating enzymes to remove or add certain genes. DNA is vastly complicated and organizations such as the Human Genome Project, which is trying to map all the genes in the human body, have helped people suffering from genetic diseases. Embryos that are produced for IVF treatment but not used can now legally be used for research into genetic diseases. In theory, a person could decide the exact appearance and nature of a child by manipulating genes in an embryo. Throughout history groups of people have been targeted as inferior or superior because they are born in a certain disposition perhaps supposedly seen as favorable in the eyes of God- genetic modification can change these aspects and would be no doubt advocated for by homicidal racist Adolph Hitler.…

    • 1374 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although scientists and other supporters paint a pretty picture of how ideal our lives would be with so many genetic choices within reach, genetic engineering undermines rather than enhances the promise of humanity because we fail to see the big picture of the responsibilities and consequences of possessing such a God-like ability.…

    • 588 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Both seem to be years, decades or centuries away, however if they are to be judged morally, it needs to be in context. I have no issue with any medical gene therapy, as I am thankful I was born without any inherit disease. I will not stand against a couple who wishes their child to be born without an inherit mental or physical illness, whether it goes against God, Nature or whatever! I do however, have an issue with “selective” genetic alteration or therapy. This is where it gets a little outrageous, I believe that as soon as a parent can change his or her unborn child’s eye, hair or skin color, the genetic potential will become endless. To the point where every child will be born with “ideal” traits, both mental and physical, and where everyone will look to have their very own perfect children. I’m no expert and I’m probably not old enough to comprehend the extent of the technology but people screaming yes or no for “designer babies” should think about both sides of the argument…

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Currently, research into genetic engineering has already been limited by social, ethical and legal concerns, showing that a line has already been drawn as to what is acceptable in scientists' quest for knowledge. However, as yet, the full benefits of human genetic engineering have not been explored as research is still being undertaken. Benefits and costs are both values that are attached, and can hence change with societal norms and tolerances, and different circumstances (for example killing in times of peace as opposed to war). I think, therefore, that in addressing the statement, one must first define what "human genetic engineering" is. If the term referred to the entirety of processes, including reproductive cloning, then yes, the cost would outweigh the benefit, as it infringes into certain communities moral beliefs, and in general, social acceptability. Yet, with such a range of meanings, to simply think of the whole thing as bad, and ban it would be presumptuous and…

    • 4667 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Better Essays