Global Justice: A Cosmopolitan Account By Gillian Brock
The global economic status of today is in much need of an improvement. Throughout the world there is great inequality between the poor and the rich. This inequality is due to either the economic status, governmental body, available natural resources, the historical events, or any of the other countless reasons why some countries are richer than others. If there was a possibility for the world to alleviate global poverty in what way would this occur? Gillian Brock seeks to explain how this improvement could occur in her book Global Justice: A Cosmopolitan Account along with other matters dealing with global justice, but the question is, is her solution of alleviating global poverty and economic inequality a viable one? In Global Justice: A Cosmopolitan Account,
…show more content…
On whether the individuals will be a from a developed country or a developing country, whether they will have a lot of or a little resources, so on and so forth. They do know that whatever rules that they create within this “meeting” they will be binding once they enter the real world. Both Rawls and Brock have a normative style view in which they look at what is happening versus what should be happening in the global order. In Brock’s normative thought experiment she calls upon delegates from countries all over the world. In essence this “gathering” is like a global conference. Within the global conference Brock does not assume that the participants are altruistic, instead she advises the delegates to be self-interested in a normal sense to make their decisions to be realistic. Once this has been settle she gives enough information to reflect the actual situation of the world. The information that she does gives is that there are divisions in the communities on the lines of nationality, religion, culture, and language. Not only does she give this basic information of
On whether the individuals will be a from a developed country or a developing country, whether they will have a lot of or a little resources, so on and so forth. They do know that whatever rules that they create within this “meeting” they will be binding once they enter the real world. Both Rawls and Brock have a normative style view in which they look at what is happening versus what should be happening in the global order. In Brock’s normative thought experiment she calls upon delegates from countries all over the world. In essence this “gathering” is like a global conference. Within the global conference Brock does not assume that the participants are altruistic, instead she advises the delegates to be self-interested in a normal sense to make their decisions to be realistic. Once this has been settle she gives enough information to reflect the actual situation of the world. The information that she does gives is that there are divisions in the communities on the lines of nationality, religion, culture, and language. Not only does she give this basic information of