Works Cited
Peter, Tom A. "Bush Wants Permanent Warrantless Wiretap Law." The CS Monitor. 22 Sept. 2007. 25 Sept. 2007 .
Seattle Post-Intelligencer Editorial Board. "Habeas Corpus: Bring It to a Vote." Seattle Post-Intelligencer. 20 Sept. 2007. 25 Sept. 2007 .
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Article I, Section 9 of the Constitution states, “The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it.” Under this provision, persons detained by the government are entitled to a judicial hearing to determine if…
- 36699 Words
- 107 Pages
Powerful Essays -
In 2008, Boumediene, a captive at Guantanamo Bay had his habeas corpus rights denied by the D.C. District Court and the Appellate Court based on bills passed by Congress. The founding fathers specifically state in Article 1, Section 9 that congress shall not pass any bill that restricts habeas corpus rights. The detainees at Guantanamo Bay live in cells for twenty-three hours of the day. They are in constant fear of being abused and tortured, mentally and physically by the guards and many have been at the naval base for over five years. Among all the detainees, none have been given access to any type of tribunal board to hear what their being convicted of. The biggest problem is that all of them have been denied habeas corpus rights which effectively allows the Executive Branch of the US government to hold them indefinitely.…
- 1383 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
Habeas Corpus today especially after what happened on September 11th President Bush made many efforts to rescind the constitutional rights of habeas corpus. He wanted to refuse habeas corpus trials to those that were in custody at Guantanamo Bay. The President pushed…
- 1580 Words
- 4 Pages
Powerful Essays -
On October 26th, 2001, just 45 days after September 11th a panicked Congress passed, with little debate, the USA Patriot Act. The 342 page patriot act violates our 1st, 4th, 5th, 6th, 8th and 14th amendments, thus making it unconstitutional. I don't know why Congress passed this act, or how it got through the Supreme Court, but most people in Congress didn't even read the Patriot Act. I am sure that our founding fathers would not have wanted the Patriot Act. Just look at what Ben Franklin said, "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."…
- 3614 Words
- 15 Pages
Better Essays -
Thesis: Wiretapping enables both parties and government agencies to monitor the communications of targeted people to determine if they are doing something wrong. The Government should not have the luxury of imposing on the privacy of Americans without a reasonable doubt as to when they should get a warrant to be able to do so. The Government should not wiretap because it is an abuse of power, distrust, and ethical dilemma, the violation of the Fourth Amendment which involves the collecting and storing information about people who are not criminals to be penalized.…
- 2159 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
Congress passed the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) in 1978 which prohibited electronic surveillance in the United States without proper warrants. The National Security Agency (NSA) wiretapping program contradicts this by allowing the NSA to conduct electronic surveillance without a warrant (“NSA”). Prior to the War on Terror, the government was allowed to secretly wiretap Americans and access their electronics with a judge's order due to FISA. After the attacks of September 11th, Congress allowed wiretapping without a specific judge's orders or even probable cause. Due to the Patriot Act, an act as a result from 9/11, the FBI could demand information from phone companies, internet service providers, banks, and even the U.S. Postal service without any court order as well (“Costs”). The Patriot Act is still to this day one of the most controversial acts in American history. This act is constantly criticized and makes people feel as if their freedom has been violated. People also feel as if it is very unnecessary because the only person that has ever been arrested due to this act was a taxi driver who tried to donate money to al-Qaeda…
- 2334 Words
- 10 Pages
Better Essays -
The main argument government officials make is that Americans need to sacrifice their privacy so that the FBI and NSA are able to effectively protect them from terrorist attacks. The NSA has records of every single phone conversation ever had. This is a complete violation of all Americans privacy. The White House has even said that The Patriot Act has not caught or helped catch any terrorist that wouldn't have otherwise been caught. Government officials just want to be able to have something to back…
- 621 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
I believe that the government still has a right to perform those actions because it is for the overall safety of the people. Organizations such as The American Civil Liberties Union are protesting and criticizing the Patriot Act. I think that their arguments are not justified. Most of the citizens in the United States are not trying to perform a terrorist attack or break criminal laws. The people that are, are the ones that are affected by this act. If a citizen has nothing to hide, then they have nothing to worry about because they are not being…
- 1045 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
In the Judiciary Act of 1789, the courts granted the power to issue habeas corpus to prisoners in federal custody. What does the United States do with enemy combatants? Should they be protected under habeas corpus? In this paper, I will discuss the role of habeas corpus and if it should be used on enemy combatants of war on terror.…
- 1657 Words
- 7 Pages
Better Essays -
Wiretapping can prevent many serious accidents from occurring which could save many lives .According to Leslie Ellis, “The 1,149 court-ordered wiretaps in 2001 produced 3,683 arrests, and 732 conviction-proofs enough that electronic surveillance is a valuable tool in catching the bad guys."With this valuable fact, this clearly proves how effective wiretapping can be. Many say this would be a violation of the U.S constitution, but that is incorrect. The U.S Constitution contains…
- 568 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Many people believe that this grants them a certain feeling of ease and rest because they know that there is something that helps identify and major threats and stop terrorist groups before anything drastic happen. This cause people to worry less and have a strong sense of safety. Others feel that this grants certain agencies to much power to spy and monitor them. People say that this takes away a lot of their own privacy and that it isn’t right. This causes them to feel a breach in their privacy and fear of what the government can do if they don’t have any limits. People against the act will want to get rid of it because they feel that the government will take advantage of this and they won’t know when to stop. Their belief is it breaks some of their own rights and this is wrong. The ACU and the ACLU are prime examples of this belief and this is why they are always fighting against it. The others believe that terrorism is a great threat not only to the United States but also around the world and some action needs to be taken immediately. The USA Patriot Act offers them exactly what they are looking for and they are willing to give up some privacy in order to find the bad people among them. Usually, the people in the United States don’t have to fear because if they don’t do anything suspicious, the government won’t look at them. It is only those certain few…
- 1930 Words
- 8 Pages
Better Essays -
A nation will always face problems weather its slavery in the past or fears of terrorism in the present. I believe that nothing should limit the government from using its powers to protect its nation and its people. Only during emergency times should the government have unlimited powers, even if means to suspend some rights. Many might argue and state that the government should have limited power even during a crisis because if the government gets stronger the rights of citizens would be violated and that the government is no longer for the people. As of today the biggest topic discussed is the government tapping in to people’s phones, emails and other sorts of personal information, raising questions about privacy and first amendment rights. I agree to this topic on some extent. However, at the time of emergency unless you have something to hide this shouldn’t be a problem because after all most actions of the government during an emergency are made to protect us citizens and our nation from harm’s…
- 1020 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
In the U.S., habeus corpus has historically been granted to detainees of the executive branch of the federal government. Over time, the privilege has been extended to all federal courts. Habeas corpus is sometimes diminished or even suspended in certain circumstances, usually revolving around states of emergency and issues of national security. For instance, after the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001, the Bush administration attempted to diminish habeas corpus rights in order to allow the government to detain terror suspects without charges being filed. By the law of war draws a distinction between the armed forces and the peaceful populations of belligerent nations and also between those who are lawful and unlawful combatants. Lawful combatants are subject to capture and detention as detainees of war by opposing military forces. Unlawful combatants are likewise subject to capture and detention, but in addition they are subject to trial and…
- 756 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Last, but not least, is the eavesdropping on our personal communication devices. The Fisa Law ensures that the US Government needs a warrant to listen in on our calls and read our emails. That means that they have to…
- 537 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The scandal involving the NSA illegally monitoring citizens is a fitting example of how the government has too much power. They were able to use their power of influence to bend the rules around the crimes they were committing. Because nobody could do anything about it, the government could do basically whatever they wanted to.…
- 1730 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays