Preview

Habeas Corpus

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
756 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Habeas Corpus
Habeas-Corpus 1

Habeas-Corpus
POL American National Government
07/22/2012

Habeas-corpus 2

Habeas-corpus

Habeas Corpus, which means "have the body," in Latin, is a legal writ that a detainee can use to claim protection from a unjustifiable detention of himself or someone else. The petition can stall disciplinary action taken against the detained party, though it must in some way display that the party responsible for the detention did so in error, legally or factually. Habeas corpus is most often claimed by the detained person himself, though it is also commonly claimed for detainee by their family members. Habeas Corpus is an old legal system that started in English common law and has been around and used prior to the year 1400. The ability to petition against unlawful detainment is an important right to protect individual freedoms and guard against arbitrary action of the state. It also protects against the tyrannical and selfish use of power of high-ranking politicals. In the U.S., habeus corpus has historically been granted to detainees of the executive branch of the federal government. Over time, the privilege has been extended to all federal courts. Habeas corpus is sometimes diminished or even suspended in certain circumstances, usually revolving around states of emergency and issues of national security. For instance, after the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001, the Bush administration attempted to diminish habeas corpus rights in order to allow the government to detain terror suspects without charges being filed. By the law of war draws a distinction between the armed forces and the peaceful populations of belligerent nations and also between those who are lawful and unlawful combatants. Lawful combatants are subject to capture and detention as detainees of war by opposing military forces. Unlawful combatants are likewise subject to capture and detention, but in addition they are subject to trial and



References: Retrieved from The Constitution of the United States: www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/constitution.html Waldman, O.M. (2012). AMERICAN GOVERNMENT, San Diego, CA: Bridgepoint Education, Inc. Retrieved from The Congressional research service: http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/RL33180.pdf Geoffrey S. Corn, on 18 Jun 2008, Briefing: http://www.worldpoliticsreview.com/articles/2310/boumediene-v-bush-and-the-role-of-the-courts-in-the-war-on-terror

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Habeas Corpus and the War on Terror. Soon after the U.S. invasion of Afghanistan in 2001, the Bush administration developed a plan for holding and interrogating prisoners captured during the conflict. They were sent to a prison inside a U.S. naval base at Guantanamo Bay on land leased from the government of Cuba. Since 2002, over 700 men have been detained at “GITMO.” Most have been released without charges or turned over to other governments.…

    • 6132 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hamdi vs Rumsfeld

    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Yaser Esam Hamdi, an American citizen, was captured in Afghanistan shortly after the terrorist attacks of September 11th. Hamdi was classified as an “enemy combatant” by the United States. His father filed a petition of Habeas Corpus that his fifth and fourteenth amendments were in violation. Although the petition did not specify on the actual circumstances of Hamdi’s capture and detention, the record indicated that Hamdi went to Afghanistan to do “relief work” less than two months before September 11th and could have not received military training. The Special Advisor to the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, Michael Mobbs, issued a response, outlining the Government’s position. The district court found the “Mobbs Declaration” insufficient in supporting the Government’s case. The Mobbs Declaration provided details regarding Hamdi’s trip to Afghanistan, his affiliation with the Taliban during a time when the Taliban was battling U.S. allies, and lastly his surrender of an assault rifle. The District Court found that the Mobbs Declaration, standing alone, did not support Hamdi’s detention and ordered the Government to turn over numerous materials. The Fourth Circuit reversed, stressing that it was undisputed that Hamdi was captured in an active combat zone, no factual inquiry or evidentiary hearing allowed Hamdi to be heard or to rebut the Government’s claims were necessary or proper. If the Mobbs Declaration was accurate, it provided a sufficient basis upon which to conclude that the President had constitutionally detained Hamdi, the court ordered the habeas petition dismissed. The appeals court held that, “no citizen shall be imprisoned or otherwise detained by the United States except pursuant to an Act of Congress”. This provides that The AUMF’s “necessary and appropriate force” language provided the authorization for Hamdi’s detention. Also that Hamdi is entitled only to a limited judicial inquiry into his detention’s rationality under…

    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The writ of habeas corpus is when you get arrested and you say “writ of habeas corpus” to be brought to a judge so he could tell you why you’ve been arrested. If there is no reason to be arrested, then, you are free to leave. It was made for people who didn’t even know why they were sent to jail. They just got arrested one day and didn’t know what they did wrong.…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    POL 201 Entire Course

    • 159 Words
    • 1 Page

    POL 201 Week 5 Final Paper Civil Liberties, Habeas Corpus, and the War on Terror…

    • 159 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    By the order of this court, the writ of habeas corpus was issued, commanding Robert Turner, superintendent of the reform school of the city of Chicago, to show cause for the caption and detention of Daniel O'Connell.…

    • 2639 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    POL 201 Final Paper

    • 1580 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In this paper I will be deliberate on the history of Habeas Corpus and how it has matured over the years. I will describe the beginning of the Habeas Corpus and the position it takes part in the U.S. and what recent act is being used. The United States Constitution must be more effectively unified into the Guantanamo methods to give equal civil rights to inmates despite what their nationality maybe, but to also have more cordial ways of reviewing obstructive servicemen to absolutely verify if they really should be treated as extremists that we should fear.…

    • 1580 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cypop 5 Task 1 Legislation

    • 4661 Words
    • 19 Pages

    * Right to Liberty and Freedom- You have the right to be free and the state can only imprison you with very good reason – for example, if you are convicted of a crime. Anyone detained by the state must be brought before a court.…

    • 4661 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Habeas Corpus in Latin, means, “You have the body.” According to our text habeas corpus means, “a demand by a court to a jailer to produce the prisoner and announce the charges” (Waldman-Levin, 2012, 5.7). In my opinion for most Americans, habeas corpus protects a prisoner and it also allows a prisoner to indicate that his/her constitution guarantees rights to a fair trial. “From a political point of view, the great value of habeas corpus is that it protects citizens from a dangerous tendency which is generally found in those who exercise the powers of government” (S. G. F., 1888, pg. 454). Habeas corpus is important when it comes to a prisoner questioning why he/she is being held or imprisoned. The Habeas Corpus Act was formed in 1679 and is used to keep an individual from being unlawfully imprisoned.…

    • 1396 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Habeas corpus is derived from the Latin term “you have the body” which is the opening terms of a legal writ (Merriam-webster.com, 2013). Habeas corpus is a legal writ that a person or prisoner can use when they are being detained by the law illegally. A prisoner has the right to know the charges that he or she is being held for and they also have the right to a trial by a jury of his or her peers (Lobban & Halliday, 2011). Habeas corpus is the actual legal action that commands the law (police or military police) to have a court inquiry as to why the detainee is being detained (The Characters of Freedom, n.d.). If the person is being detained for insufficient or unjustifiable reasons the court can order the release of the prisoner. So basically putting it, Habeas corpus is identified as a legal safeguard that protects people’s individual rights and not being illegally imprisoned (A Constitutional History of Habeas Corpus, 1982).…

    • 1498 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    We have heard in high school and news about Habeas Corpus and War on Terror, but what does those terms really mean? Habeas Corpus is an act that was established in 1679 by England’s Parliament to give prisoners a fair trial. The War on Terror was established on 9/2011 to bring war against Afghanistan for terrorizing the U.S. In this paper, I will further discuss Habeas Corpus and War on Terror and how the two came into terms with each other within the United States.…

    • 1185 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Unlawful Arrest

    • 871 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In efforts to suppress wars, counter terrorism and illegal immigration, the declaration of martial law has been devised. Although its proclamation shows in favor of settling these major issues that the United States has faced over the years. However, under the assertion of martial law, it has played a major role in the vast amounts of unlawful arrest of citizens and non-citizens by the misuse of governmental powers. The affirmation of martial law impacts the increased numbers in the unlawful detainment of United States civilians.…

    • 871 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Civil Liberties History

    • 2698 Words
    • 11 Pages

    For example, habeas corpus has evolved throughout history to become an institution within the civil liberties guaranteed by the Constitution for all Americans. The term habeas corpus is Latin and translates to having the body (Cornell University Law School, 2010). The writ of habeas corpus serves as an important examination on the manner in which state courts pay respect to federal constitutional rights. Habeas corpus is akin to any other civil liberty, which cannot be reduced by the federal government (Levin-Waldman, 2012). The writ of habeas corpus is the fundamental instrument for safeguarding individual freedom against arbitrary and lawless state actions (Cornell University Law School, 2010). Habeas corpus prevents individuals from being arrested and held without cause. Without habeas corpus, political prisoners could be detained indefinitely. Ironically enough while America was attempting to define its own power, the foundation for habeas corpus during wartime was built on English tradition (Levin-Waldman, 2012). Just as the Parliament struggled against the authority of the British Crown, the citizens of the United States likewise struggle against governmental…

    • 2698 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Miranda rights are the rights a police offer is required to say to someone when the officer arrests that person. It is the warning that officers of the law give suspects so they know about their rights before they are interrogated. It was a law made after the conclusions of the Miranda vs. Arizona case. The case was very close as it was a 5-4 decision. The court ruled that any type of evidence, whether it is incriminating or proof of innocence, can be used as evidence in a case; however it can only be used if the police let the suspect know that they have the right to an attorney before and during questioning and also that the suspect can be silent to avoid self-incrimination before an interrogation. It is now a staple when police arrests are made. In this paper, I will explain why I believe that the Miranda Rights are not necessary anymore.…

    • 922 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bush Administration

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Article I, Section 9 of the Constitution states, "The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it." Under this provision, persons detained by the government are entitled to a judicial hearing to determine if there is any legal basis for their detention. Some legal commentators refer to the right of habeas corpus as the "great writ of liberty" because it is a prisoner's ultimate recourse to an impartial judge who can review the possibility that he is being held…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Habeas Corpus

    • 389 Words
    • 2 Pages

    “Do I abide by the law and let the whole country fall apart or do I violate on law and save the whole county”. I believe that this become a troubling question for any president when the country welfare is threatened. The legislative branch is not truly concerned with the president having total power in these situations if they were concerned they would implement and establish a clear set regulation that would have step in place that may lead up to act of terrorism has been committed when the nation is on full alert for example. When an act of terrorism is committed to me it does not matter if they are detained on or off foreign soil they become an enemy of the state. Habeas Corpus should not exist for you. I understand that this is a right established by our fore fathers in the constitution, but what I do not understand is how you expect to have these right when you are trying to destroy everything that lead to the establishment of these rights and possibly form a county that is was in my opinion so these right do not apply. Why do you think you the land was obtained on foreign soil? When any country has Special Forces and their job is interrogation you think they are thinking about Habeas Corpus?…

    • 389 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays