Moreover, gentrification also impacts the economics of a neighborhood. These impacts include both the positive and negative situations for their community. Lower-class residents are constantly being targeted by large city government corporations to relocate, however, along with these negative connotations, are benefits. Benefits that include a more lavish lifestyle which include the installation of boutiques, bookstores, coffee shops, and clubs. Gentrification also impacts economics on a larger scale when considering redevelopment projects. These projects are often managed by big name corporations who use gentrification to their aid when undergoing such businesses . The question of ethics also applies to the process of gentrification. An analysis of gentrification through an ethical perspective reveals the disagreements that exist over whether it should be tolerated. Some view it as unethical due to several negative consequences, such as displacement and outright racism. On the other hand, some see it as ethical because of the many benefits it…
The author discusses the comparison between two low-income neighborhoods and what one neighborhood was able to accomplish. In Highpoint, Seattle Washington residents decided to take…
“We spent a lot of money on our homes” yelled one white man, “They’ll be worth nothing!”4 “No one wants them here! Lets drive them out!”5 “Our houses are worth half of what they were yesterday!”6 The white citizens of Levittown felt extremely threatened that their perfect community would be ruined by an African-American family moving in. In fact, the main reason they had come to Levittown was to separate themselves from African-Americans. Many of the concerned citizens of Levittown that gathered into a mob outside of the Myers’ house made it clear that they had come to Levittown because Bill Levitt had promoted it as whites-only, “Levitt promised!”7 8 Mob formed outside of the Myers’ house in…
Years ago, there was once a small town called Chaves Ravine within Los Angeles, California and this town was a poor rural community that was always full of life. Two hundred families, mostly Chicano families, were living here quite peacefully until the Housing Act of 1949 was passed. The Federal Housing Act of 1949 granted money to cities from the federal government to build public housing projects for the low income. Los Angeles was one of the first cities to receive the funds for project. Unfortunately, Chavez Ravine was one of the sites chosen for the housing project, so, to prepare for the construction work of the low-income apartments, the Housing Authority of Los Angeles had to convince the people of the ravine to leave, or forcibly oust them from their property. Since Chavez Ravine was to be used for public use, the Housing Authority of Los Angeles was able seize and buy Chavez Ravine from the property owners and evict whoever stayed behind with the help of Eminent Domain. The LA Housing Authority had told the inhabitants that low-income housing was to be built on the land, but, because of a sequence of events, the public housing project was never built there and instead Dodgers Stadium was built on Chavez Ravine. Although Chavez Ravine public housing project was the result of the goodwill and intent of the government, rather than helping the people Chavez Ravine with their promise of low-income housing, the project ended up destroying many…
She grew up in The Bronx. She moved to the projects in The Bronx for better living conditions. “Around the same time that junior was born, we moved to a newly constructed public housing project in Soundview, just a ten-minute drive from our old neighborhood. The Bronxdale houses sprawled over three large city blocks: twenty-eight buildings, each seven stories tall with eight apartments to a floor. My mother saw the projects as a safer, cleaner, brighter alternative to the decaying tenement what we had lived… in the projects we were isolated.”…
Research shows how elected officials at the local and state level not only allowed, but promoted segregation, deceptive real estate practices, which only fueled further decline into already poor St. Louis neighborhoods. St. Louis city mayor Francis Slay expressed in a radio interview with local reporter Don Marsh, how truly segregated most of the St. Louis remains today, even after the passing of desegregation and the Civil Rights Amendment of 1964. Mayor Slay stated that his city continues to be one of the most segregated in America (Rosenbaum, 2015). Though the city and surrounding municipalities are working to include diversity in community programs, there is still a long way to go before the racial divide in St. Louis decreases. Segregation continues today, within St. Louis and it affects the school system, housing, and businesses within Ferguson and surrounding communities are evident of decades of elected officials not enforcing desegregation laws as well as supporting unlawful real estate practices from the 1960’s…
It can be easily said that not only social situation or white fight against public housing in Eastern area but also political involvement which help that situation to keep the side out of the minority people. Therefore, social, political and economical push factor actually help to segregate public housing and school in the Southwest Yonkers. Even, the housing developer also against the affordable housing projects in Yonkers. ''That is a pretty heavy absorption,'' said Howard P. Sturman, a real-estate developer from Mount Vernon who is about to build 600 condominiums on the Hudson River in Yonkers. So capitalism grasp humanity as well because we can see that case he not only opposed that but also mentioned Yonkers can't take that weight because it is lot to ask. Although most cases rich people would mind to spend money on real estate no matter where it would build. As we read in our class “ The Case for Reparations” where we have read that white people bought property in the poor neighborhood and rented out to the poor people and make profit out of it. Thus, Sturman would have less worried regarding to the affordable housing in…
In the case of Atlanta, the city’s elites targeted mixed-race communities adjacent to predominantly White spaces with the claim they were “blighted” in order to justify their demolishing in order to serve private interest. In 1933 and 1996, the impacts of the racialization of blight, urban renewal, and residential segregation culminated in Atlanta with increasing tension between Black and White landowners/residences. In 1933, developer, Charles Forrest Palmer spearheaded two public housing projects Techwood and University Homes, both of which served as examples of housing with racial disparities as one served to accommodate Whites and the other, Blacks (Taylor 244). Within these developments, housing was given to Whites as a priority hence,…
Los Angeles in the 1900s was changing at a very rapid pace. African Americans from the South were migrating to the major cities of the North in search of opportunity. In the 1920s, the first wave of migration largely bypassed the city of Los Angeles. But starting in the 1940s, the second wave of migration caused Los Angeles’s population to skyrocket from 63,700 to 350,000 by the year 1960. This mass-migration caused many demographic problems in the new racially diverse city. The first sign of lingering segregation was that Blacks and Hispanics were still not allowed to buy real estate in certain areas of the city, even though it was illegal. This caused a completely uneven distribution of race across the city. Another factor in this problem was new house construction. Suburban house constructors like Davenport saw the opportunity for an increase in house sales in suburban areas, so they used unsettled land in cities like Compton to create a blue-collar paradise. The houses were of lower middle class quality and were great for African American workers who recently moved to the city. The third factor for the uneven distribution was a process known as blockbusting. Realtors would sell empty houses in white neighborhoods to black families, then convince the rest of the white neighborhood that the black community is infiltrating this area. All the white families would move out and the realtors would sell the newly empty…
Robert Moses was the creator of New York City, Long Island, and Westchester County, NY throughout the 1 1930s and 1950s. He had transformed neighborhoods into shorelines and highways/roadways. He was very successful and changed NYC forever. However, some believed that he had removed lower-class residents from their homes to benefit the rich. I believe that he had helped the people of the future by making their life easier and untroublesome. But he was also very inconsiderate with the people who he had displaced to create a better future for the working society today. He had ignored the people of New York City, who had made the city up. Streets, playgrounds, and pools do not make a city, but the people who live within it do. Michael Powell wrote an article in the New York Times called “A Tale of Two Cities”. In his article he discussed the two view points of what Robert Moses had built. He uses Robert Caro’s article, “The Power Broker: Robert Moses and the Fall of New York”, to show that he had disregarded public input to overcome his desire for power. Powell tells us that Caro believed that Moses neglected public transit and destroyed many neighborhoods to build his renewal projects. Powell quotes Caro, “We don’t need a new Robert Moses because he ignored the values of New York”. In other words, Caro thinks that the city would have been a different place (a better place) if Moses never existed. His 1,200 page article also includes that he was racist not only to the poor but to the black people as well. This opened the eyes of many people. People started to look outside the box and not only at these “acres if sterile public housing towers, parks and playgrounds for the rich and comfortable, and highways” that he built. They realized that he ignored the voices of the people whose houses he ruptured. He forced them out of the homes and only gave them a 90 day notice. Everyone was clueless as to why this was happening and they did not have enough time to leave.…
The most manifest case of residential segregation is when a majority/dominant group (whites as a rule) imposes segregation on a minority/ subordinate group (e.g. African-Americans). Unfortunately, it has been still the case that African-Americans traditionally suffer from severe prejudices as well as from the discrimination in urban residential markets. Furthermore they often live in systematically deprived vicinities. Furthermore this ongoing residential suburban segregation has long term effect on Afro-American families as well as on their ability to sell and purchase homes, due to the red-lining of such vicinities described below.…
Public policies have played a large role in creating the suburbs and contributing to segregation in Los Angeles. The 1956 Interstate Defense Highway Act helped create and sustain suburbs but the process maintained segregation against those of low income. After the streetcar system government organizations built freeways in areas of low income, leaving residents with no choice but to evacuate. In addition, the 1949 Housing Act allowed the city of Los Angeles to evict residents of the Chavez Ravine in order to “redevelop” the area. Equally important Restrictive Covenants played significant role in creating suburbs but definitely maintain segregation. Although public policies have indeed helped to create and sustain suburbs, many policies promoted segregation.…
But yet, the white rich people is not being affected by the toxics in their communities. The text states that ‘’separate residential limits or districts for white and negro residents’’. This shows that U.S. minorities have been placed in separate areas for a long time as noted in the article.”he found blacks overrepresented in areas with toxins, hazardous waste storage facilities and sewage treatment plants’’.That’s a shame because why are they putting all of this toxic waste in…
The article, “The Myth of Gentrification: It’s extremely rare and not as bad for the poor as you think” by John Butin, focuses on the positive aspects of remodeling low income neighborhoods. Butin begins the article by stating two facts. Butin believes that popular cities in New York started the trend of gentrification by introducing an upscale vibe to rundown low income neighborhoods. Butin informs the reader how it seemingly started to spread to other states. He describes most peoples’ view with gentrification. Most people believe that gentrification is a displacement of poor people and making the neighborhood inhabitable to those with low wages. Butin states that the goal of gentrification is to change low-income neighborhood into high-income…
Living in a neighborhood of color wherein there is no preference for people with low income, represents a socio-historic process where rising housing costs, public policy, persistent segregation, and racial animus facilitates the influx of violence between black and white menace as a results of residential displacement which is otherwise refer to as gentrification. This has however deprived many citizens of the United States, a good quality of life as it boils down to an argumentative issue between the rich and the poor balance of standard of living. American’s extinction is not necessarily the amount or kind of violence that characterizes our history,” Richard Slotkin writes, “but the…