Preview

Grievances of the Plebians

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
714 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Grievances of the Plebians
The grievances of the plebeians and their attempt to gain equality with the patricians in the internal history of the Early Roman Republic lasted for over 200 years. The plebeians and the patricians were two classes of citizenship can Ancient Rome, though they had very significant differences in their status. These variations came in the form of Political, religious, legal, social, economic and military status. Through 200 years these statuses began to blur as Ancient Roman laws were changed due to the increasing population of plebeians and wars that surrounded Rome.
One of the many grievances the plebeians experienced was in the political sense, they were exposed to the authority of the Consuls, who had control of the lives of the citizens, and whose decisions there was no appeal for. Plebeians had no right to hold public office and were excluded from the Senate (an aristocrat body). In assembly, those who were not clients of a patrician were outvoted by patricians and their clients. For religion, plebeians were excluded from any part of the administration of the state religion and from significant priesthoods.
With matters involving legal status, all the civil and criminal law was in the hands of one’s patrician. The plebeians had no knowledge of the laws or access to the administration of the legal system. With social matters plebeians even had their own form of marriage. In the beginning they could not intermarry legally with patricians and if they had a child then that child will be automatically classed as a plebeian.
In the economic sense, plebeians were only granted land to work for patricians; they also had to give economic and political support. A lot of plebeians were in debt because of the wars which they had to fight. They also had to play tributum (military tax) in times of war, however patricians didn’t have to pay this tax. Plebeians also received no share in the distribution of public land and were also excluded from the use of public grazing



References: - Ancient Rome Using Evidence, Pamela Bradley, 1990 -The complete idiots guide to the Roman Empire, Nelson, E, 2002 - http://www.vroma.org/~bmcmanus/orders.html - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conflict_of_the_Orders - http://www.unrv.com/empire/struggle-of-the-orders.php

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Ap World History Dbq

    • 3642 Words
    • 15 Pages

    Consequences in the Roman Empire were also shown between the patricians and the plebeians. During the fifth century B.C.E, relations between the classes became so strained that the plebeians threatened to succeed from Rome and establish a rival settlement. This eventually led to the establishment of tribunes which altered the Roman government.…

    • 3642 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    APWH Rome and China Notes

    • 1379 Words
    • 5 Pages

    c This caused the Patricians to benefit greatly, but the plebeians did not. This caused a larger gap between the rich and poor.…

    • 1379 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The structure of the Republic and its underlying flaws, shown through individual actions, was integral to the weakening of the Roman Republic. This government consisted of two factions; the Optimate and the Populares. The Optimates were traditionalist politicians, who supported the republic and wished to minimize the power of the popular assemblies and the Tribunes of the plebs. The Populares represented the people and relied on the legislative assemblies and the Tribunate to gain power. The senate tended to side with the Optimates as there key interests coincided. They were perturbed with the idea of individuals rising through the assemblies, backed by their armies and the Tribunate. When Pompey wished to secure land for his war veterans in 62 BC, the senate blocked him, as they did not want him gaining power and challenging them. This relates to the relative power of the Senate and the assemblies. The senate could pass decrees in the form of advice. However if this conflicted with a law passed through the assembly, it would override the senates decree. The Senate had tried to undermine this power; yet, was restored under the consulships of Caesar in 59 and Crassus and Pompey in 55. As the republic declined, individuals used the tribunes and the assemblies for their personal gain. This is how Pompey and Crassus passed laws,…

    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    At the end of their term, they were held accountable to the popular assembly for any decisions made. "Position open only to patricians, plebeians became eligible in 367 BCE and by 342 BCE legislation dictated that one of the two consuls had to be a plebeian"(Roman Government). The Senate had limited legislative jurisdiction; it's initially available only to the patricians, indirect exclusive power. It had no proper authority, and significant influence was continued, working for an advisory body to the representatives. Individuals of the conservative organization were voluntary and labored for life except finding guilty of…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    |Conflict of Orders- Patricians vs. Plebeians became a fight between the rich wealthy class and the majority peasant class |…

    • 1019 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    They were supposed to pay taxes and fight in battles. Which I think is wrong because nobody should be forced into battle. Plebs were also not allowed to vote in decision over wars and peace. They called the patrician the privileged class in Rome. They were the rich and had everything the plebs didn't. Plebes struggle with equal rights but soon got them.…

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To obtain political rights, the common people (Plebeians) formed their own assembly, the Concillum Plebus and named their leaders tribunes.…

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Patricians are the type of people that were descendents from the most ancient noble families. The patricians live in large estates, and own lands This also either marry or do business with people from their own class. Along with the plebeians and patricians there was also an emperor, equestrians, the senate, free slaves and slaves. The emperor ruled over the people of Rome and equestrians were affluent landowners, and also people who chose business over politics. Freed slaves are slaves that have been freed by either their master or were bought out of slavery, and slaves are the ones who still work for their masters or sometimes they are generally prisoners of…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rome before 264BC

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Romans had a basic law of sorts, called the laws of the Twelve Tables. This governed a lot of Roman daily life and proceedings, and was the basis of a sort of equal rights scheme for the plebeian class. In addition to this, the Lex Hortensia, passed in 287BC, further blurred the distinctions between plebeians and patricians. The twelve tables, and any laws passed by a plebeian assembly, would now be binding to both plebeians and patricians, a sort of social justice.…

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1. Why would Tom and Huck first go out to the cemetery? (A) To charm away warts (B) To dig up a buried body (C) To dig up a hidden treasure (D) To kill a dog 2.…

    • 393 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    They also had people the were the the lowest class, like peasants and the serfs.…

    • 677 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Into the Wild: Vocabulary

    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages

    altruistic- unselfishly concerned for or devoted to the welfare of others ( opposed to egoistic ).…

    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Roman Citizenship Dbq

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In Rome, not all citizens had the same rights. This was an advantage for the Roman Republic because the people that were conquered by Rome were accepted and put into three categories Latini, Foederati, and peregrini. It was an organization that allowed the Roman Empire to be so successful. On Document C, Emperor Claudius states, “What was the ruin of Sparta and Athens, but this, that mighty as they were in war, they spurned from them as aliens those whom they have conquered.” This quote tells us why Athens way of choosing people to become citizens was inferior to the methods of the Roman…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Ancient Rome, patricians were known to be the ruling class of the society, while plebians were the peasants or commoners without opportunities to move upward on the social ladder. The lack of social mobility in Ancient Rome poses a comparison against modern time United States. One of the very core foundations of the U.S. is that citizens are encouraged to pursue the American dream. People still hold true the promise of the better life by achieving education attainment…

    • 573 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Athens Under Solon

    • 2325 Words
    • 10 Pages

    When the city of Athens stood on the brink of revolution, the citizens of Athens looked upon Solon and gave him the task of creating new laws for them because of troubles that had been plaguing them for a long time. “ They saw that he more than anyone else in city, stood apart from the injustices of the time and was involved neither in the extortions of the rich nor the privations of the poor” (Plutarch 55, Par 1). In this paper I will be writing of changes that took effect under Solon and whether those changes resolved the conflicts that brought Athens on the brink of revolution. First, I will be writing about the conflict over land ownership and slavery between aristocrats and common people, who appointed Solon as reconciler and archon and whether his new laws resolved those conflicts. Secondly, I will be writing of conflict over power between aristocrats and aristocrats, feuds that used to run between families and would not get resolved until there was no one left to take revenge on and how Solon’s new laws changed that. And another laws of Solon’s that he was highly appraised for to make an Athens better place under him such as laws on Dowry, Inheritance, and Wills. Thirdly, I will be writing of political laws that took places under Solon’s era and how he secured those laws against alteration for a hundred years that gave powers to common people in Athens. The Two sources I will be using to write this paper are The Athenian Constitution (The document given in class by Prof. Trumbach) and Plutarch: The Rise and fall of Athens (Textbook assigned for class).…

    • 2325 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays