Preview

Grigory Rasputin's Role in the Decline and Fall of the Romanov Dynasty

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
966 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Grigory Rasputin's Role in the Decline and Fall of the Romanov Dynasty
The Decline and Fall of the Romanov Dynasty
It can be argued that Grigory Rasputin was responsible for the fall of the Romanov Dynasty to an extent. There are many aspects that Rasputin was the cause for Nicholas and his family losing their powers over the people of Russia. It is believed that Rasputin was only the catalyst that brought about widespread revolt.
Rasputin played a very important role in the lives of the royal family, especially to the Tsar and Tsarina’s only son , Tsarevich Alexei, who was suffering a lot of pain from the disease Haemophilia. Rasputin was regarded as the last means to an end to cure the Tsar and the Tsarina’s haemophiliac son. They had tried to find a cure everywhere for their son and in 1905 ask the peasant healer to help. In 1908 when Alexei was seriously ill, Rasputin was called to Royal palace where he managed to stop the bleeding. From then on the Tsar referred to Rasputin as “our friend” displaying to the people the amount of trust they had in Rasputin.
Tsar Nicholas II couldn’t stop the progression of revolution as he came to rule at a difficult time. He was out of touch with his people and was known as a leader that was no good, weak, hesitant; and extremely hard-headed. Tsar Nicholas II was at the time mainly concerned with his family issues instead of being focused on the political issues. He was also not prepared to efficiently rule a country where there was a massive variety of people with different languages, race, religion; and culture. It is reported that during Nicholas’s earlier years while his father was still in power, that he found government meetings boring and was not interested in the affairs of state. The Tsar wanted the country to still be ruled as an autocracy where the peasants and the working class had extremely below average standard of living, while the royal family live in a life filled with riches and extravagances.
Tsar Nicholas undertook absolute command of the Russian army fighting on the



Bibliography: * Grigori Efimovich Rasputin [online] http://www.alexanderpalace.com/2006rasputin/index.html [accessed 19th March 2011] * Grigori Rasputin Biography [Online] http://www.biographybase.com/biography/rasputin_grigori.html [accessed 19th March 2011] * Gregory Rasputin: Biography. [Online] http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/RUSrasputin.htm [accessed 19th March 2011] * Gilliard, P. Thirteen Years at the Russian Court. 2008 [Online] http://www.alexanderpalace.org/2006pierre/chapter_XII.html [accessed 19th March 2011] * The Decline and Fall of the Romanov Dynasty [Online] http://www.docshare.com/doc/162390/The-Decline-And--Fall-Of-The-Romanov-Dynasty [accessed 23rd March 2011] * Radzinsky, E. 2001, The Rasputin File. Anchor Books * Shukman, H. 2009, Rasputin: An Introduction. The History Press -------------------------------------------- [ 1 ]. Gregory Rasputin: Biography. [Online] http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/RUSrasputin.htm [Date Accessed 18th March 2011]

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    War broke out in 1914, with Tsar Nicholas becoming commander-in-chief in 1915, meaning he was away from Petrograd. Not only was this poorly thought out by Nicholas because it gave the people an opportunity to plot against him, but as he was away he left Tsarina (also a German princess), Alexandra, in charge during his absence. Due to the war being against Germany, this made the Russian people nervous and skeptical towards the extreme power she had over them during such a crucial time. Not only were they disgruntled by this, but also Alexandra’s close friendship to Rasputin, a Serbian peasant. This particularly angered the aristocracy and middle classes as they believed they were being led by someone of lower demeanor than that of themselves. This weakened support for the autocratic rule and lost the Tsar many of his supporters, which put him in a vulnerable position in the case of revolutionary upturn. This also could have inspired the peasantry to discover greater aspirations and encourage their belief that they could have greater status which in turn could trigger new revolutionary ideas amongst the lower classes. This demonstrates a link between Nicholas being away in order to commandeer army movement for the war, however it is arguable that it was a lack of authority and respect for the Tsarist regime that caused the change of opinions towards the Tsar amongst all classes, lessening his support and leaving him far more vulnerable in the case of a revolution.…

    • 1166 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Czar Nicholas was famous for his autocratic ideas, meaning that he theoretically had total power. His autocratic belief led to an ineffective rule. Nicholas II was the leader of the Russian Empire; however, he was not prepared for the tremendous obligations of administration. The Britannica article, “Nicholas II” claims, “Neither by upbringing nor by temperament was Nicholas fitted for the complex tasks that awaited him as autocratic ruler of a vast empire.” This suggests that Czar Nicholas’s rule was doomed from the start of his czarship. Nicholas’s inexperience explained his ineffectiveness as a ruler. In addition, Czar Nicholas’s absolutist beliefs blinded him from change. Nicholas II’s belief that he had absolute power and stubbornness clouded his view of change. According to Encyclopedia.com’s “Nicholas II,” “[Nicholas] was too stubborn and very slow to recognize the need for change. Nicholas found it…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The autocratic rule that dominated the 300 year old dynasty was also a key factor in its destruction; the social unrest, clamour for political reform, backwardness of the Russian economy and the lack of reforms were all created by the Tsarist regime. The Romanov family ruled with an iron fist and used brutal violence to control its subjects. The repressive policies such as Russification and lack of effective reforms prevented the modernisation of the social and political aspects of the nation. Autocratic rulers promoted the feudalistic style class system which created extreme poverty in the lower classes and gave the people no political power. The introduction of ideas of liberty and an elected government into Russian society, contributed to the creation of revolutionary groups that aimed to overthrow the autocratic rulers and establish more liberal governments. This was first seen with the attempted political coup of the Decembrists that ultimately failed, however they were significant as the introduced a revolutionary trend and liberal views to the people. With the introduction of liberal views and equality, the people began to show their anger and frustration, caused by the Romanovs, through protests and revolutions, of which ultimately ended the Romanov Dynasty. The style of autocratic rulership is a key factor that impacted the fall of the Romanovs primarily because of the social issues it created.…

    • 1611 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In July 1918, the royal Romanov line was suddenly and brutally ended by the Bolsheviks. The Romanov family had ruled the Russian Empire for over three centuries. The Romanovs reign was one of strict tyranny. Tsar Nicholas II of Russia made one big step toward a more equal Russia by freeing the serfs but because the serfs owned no land they had little to no money still. After WWI when nicholas led Russia to a crushing defeat there was lots of unrest throughout Russia. I think that the main reason the Tsar was forced to abdicate the throne and then was slaughtered is that he made a more equal Russia but in doing so he made the serfs more impoverished than ever, that he had led Russia into multiple wars that had ended badly and that the technology…

    • 151 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Rasputin altered the course of a reigning family over an empire of three centuries. The amount Rasputin achieved and managed to change even past his murder was vastly amazing, he attained lots of significant power in a short amount of time during his period spent with the royal family History Learning Site. Grigori Rasputin became a central figure in modern Russian history up until the fall of the Romanov dynasty History Learning Site. When Rasputin entered the home of the Tsar and his family, he ultimately entered the home and lives of the entire country. By ‘miraculously’ saving the life of an ill Tsesarevich Alexei for a brief time in his short life, Rasputin took down the rest of his family and their rule…

    • 1953 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    'The growing influence of Gregory Rasputin over the Romanov’s did a great deal to damage the royal family' - Historian Chris Trueman…

    • 1325 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the book the ”The Family Romanov” there were many tragedies. In 1894 Russia’s last tsar, Nicholas II, inherited the throne when he was unprepared to do so. Another tragedy was that Nicholas’s only son was a hemophiliac. At the end of the book Nicholas, his wife, and his five children died. Karl Marx once said, “History repeats itself, first as a tragedy, second as farce.”…

    • 247 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Many countries, all throughout history, have had their ups and downs; their successes and failures. History is replete with the conquests, conquering, rising and falling of nations. Amongst all these nations sits Russia, which has a rich history full of these features. One era of the Russian nation stands out, and that is the era of the Romanov Dynasty. In the movie, Rasputin: The Dark Servant of Destiny, which covers the closing years of the Romanov Dynasty and its downward spiral during World War 1 under the rule of Tsar Nicholas II, the involvement of an eccentric monk by the name of Rasputin is its focus. While we know the Romanov Dynasty was real, and Rasputin had some impact on the period, just how much impact did Rasputin have on…

    • 240 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Undeniably, Nicholas II had an enormous role in bringing about the downfall of the Romanov Dynasty in March 1917. Whilst many historians argue the fall of the Tsarist regime to be the direct response and product of World War I, it is quite evident that it was Nicholas’ inefficient and fatal autocratic ruling which led to the March Revolution of 1917. The effects of Russia’s involvement in numerous wars only heightened and highlighted Nicholas’ unsuitability for the role of Tsar, and his absolute and stubborn belief in autocracy. Had Nicholas’ various choices throughout his reign differed, the Romanov Dynasty could in fact, have existed…

    • 1391 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nicolas Romanov was not at all a very effective or strong leader. Above anything, he did not do anything to help the peasants who took up 84 percent of the country, and barely ever had enough food for the family. The peasant population was constantly increasing and Nicholas did nothing to help it. Another poor quality is that he secretly supplied the Black Hundred with weapons, used to eliminate anyone again the autocracy. Because he became so against the idea of the Duma, he became a much less caring ruler.…

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Tsarist Autocracy

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Tsarist autocracy has succeeded for more than three hundred years, but the Russian Revolution that occurred on November 1917 ended the long term autocracy. During this time period, Tsar Nicholas II was the leader of Russia and indeed the last one. He caused Russia’s downfall and made many Russians frustrated about the government. The Tsar did not acknowledge the nation's problems and failed to improve the lives of the citizens. As the Russians struggled with limited rights and lack of help from Nicholas II, they had to make a move. Although peasant unrest led to the Russians protesting and rebelling against the country, the Russian Revolution occurred because of Tsar Nicholas II’s weak leadership, in which he failed to accomplished the Russian’s goals, horribly managed the military, and thought that the system should not change.…

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1917, a famous revolution led tsar Nicholas II and his immediate family to be abdicated from the Russian throne. The same year, the family was killed, leading to the Romanov family to end its several century long reign. But why exactly was the Romanov family killed? Did they not care for the wellbeing of their citizens? Were they simply just too corrupt for any good? There are several answers to this question, the main ones being governmental corruption, a belief of superiority, and an unreasonable amount of bloodshed in WWI.…

    • 1127 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Michael Sommers Professor McFarland D410 8 October 2014 Grigori Rasputin Grigori Rasputin played a major role in Russia from 1906 to 1916, but who was this man? Why was he was worshiped by the peasants, loved by the Tsar and Tsarina, and hated by other nobles. This man is such a controversial figure in Russian history. He is seen to some as man of God, a healer, and a profit.…

    • 2968 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Romanovs Fall

    • 550 Words
    • 3 Pages

    I should probably sum up what I'm trying to say: The fall of the Romanovs certainly cannot be blamed on Rasputin. Like I mention below, I believe that the main reason was the inability of Nicholas to either crack down like a true tyrant, or yield to the demands of the 1905 revolutionary liberals, and make Russia a constitutional monarchy (like the UK).…

    • 550 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the factors that lead the tsarist regime to collapse was Tsar’s personality. Nicholas II was coronated in 1894 but he wasn’t ready to be a Tsar because just in 1881 he witnessed his granddads, Alexander II’s assassination when his carriage was blown up. Nicholas was not a strong character and he didn’t want to be a Tsar but he was religious and both he and his wife Alexandra believed they were chosen by God and couldn’t challenge his decision. ‘He had intelligence...faith and courage but he was...ignorant about governmental matters. Nicky had been trained as a soldier. He had not been taught statesmanship and...was not a statesman.’ (2) Also he was more of a family man rather than a ruler and was a devoted husband and father who looked good in the eyes of his people but he didn’t really bother about what happened to Russia and didn’t really do what he was meant to do; rule the country, which weakened him significantly. Although he was a good father he was unhappy as his only son Alexis suffered from haemophilia and it was likely to die young which again out the Tsar away from ruling the country. He was ignorant and refused to share power. ‘He mistrusted most of his ministers and yet was incapable of carrying out the task of ruling the vast Russian empire alone.’ (7) At first peasants were loyal to him and believed he’d carry on what his granddad did, free servants, relax censorship of the press, improve conditions of the army, change education and bring in Zemstva; locally…

    • 2104 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays