Group1
Group 1 : CYBER COURT IN MALAYSIA. DO WE REALLY NEED IT???
Mark of explanation
As for group 2, evaluation on the mark given will be based on each criteria being mark. Below are the explanations:
Contents:
* Research (17m out of 20m)
The information given are accurate, concise and complete. They get the information based on a web browser on any given topic.
* Relevance (7m out of 10m)
Information provided is well related with the topic. The PESTEL Analysis is much not related with the topic given since that, it is not necessary to known on those factors.
* Topicality (6m out of 10m)
Given topic is based on questionnaires that it shows that the court should have cyber either or not in Malaysia. * Conclusion (14m out of 20m)
Conclusion, the court stated that there should be in Malaysia cyber technology that can be controlled and protected from crime. It does not conclude all the information presented which is based on the topic.
Presentation * Clarity (8m out of 10m)
Each team member will give their explanation is very clear and concise. Even the explanation given was excellent and the audience is well understood on what is being delivered by them.
* Structure (7m out of 10m)
The slide made by this group is well structured and clear to understand. It is well organized and becoming much easy for audience to understand.
* Materials (7m out of 10m)
Information they provide is based on research and the internet. information in their slide in simple words, clear and concise so that the audience can understand what they want to convey.
Bonus (8m out of 10m) * Comment
Overall, the presentation is good and they manage to handle any question given and the information being delivered by them is well understand by all audience and the slides and color used was suitable and clear.
Concise description * Based on the title given by this group, they were able to perform well in presenting information. This topic is
Mark of explanation
As for group 2, evaluation on the mark given will be based on each criteria being mark. Below are the explanations:
Contents:
* Research (17m out of 20m)
The information given are accurate, concise and complete. They get the information based on a web browser on any given topic.
* Relevance (7m out of 10m)
Information provided is well related with the topic. The PESTEL Analysis is much not related with the topic given since that, it is not necessary to known on those factors.
* Topicality (6m out of 10m)
Given topic is based on questionnaires that it shows that the court should have cyber either or not in Malaysia. * Conclusion (14m out of 20m)
Conclusion, the court stated that there should be in Malaysia cyber technology that can be controlled and protected from crime. It does not conclude all the information presented which is based on the topic.
Presentation * Clarity (8m out of 10m)
Each team member will give their explanation is very clear and concise. Even the explanation given was excellent and the audience is well understood on what is being delivered by them.
* Structure (7m out of 10m)
The slide made by this group is well structured and clear to understand. It is well organized and becoming much easy for audience to understand.
* Materials (7m out of 10m)
Information they provide is based on research and the internet. information in their slide in simple words, clear and concise so that the audience can understand what they want to convey.
Bonus (8m out of 10m) * Comment
Overall, the presentation is good and they manage to handle any question given and the information being delivered by them is well understand by all audience and the slides and color used was suitable and clear.
Concise description * Based on the title given by this group, they were able to perform well in presenting information. This topic is