Preview

Groupthink In 12 Angry Men

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
398 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Groupthink In 12 Angry Men
A psychological phenomenon where people tend to strive for consensus within a group while assuming their decisions cannot be wrong. Individual who may have opposing beliefs often remain quiet and adopt to the groups opinion for the sake of conformity. (Cherry)
Applications:
1. One setting in which groupthink occurs in the movie 12 Angry Men. The movie is about a jury who must reach a verdict of guilty or not guilty on a murder case. 11 out of the 12 jurors vote “guilty”, while one votes “not guilty.” The lonely juror proves his case, and slowly gains alliance. The more people that change the verdict to not guilty, an increase of stress is put on the other jurors. They all end up changing vote to not guilty in the end to gain conformity. Groupthink
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    12 Angry Men: Overview
    • 1553 Words
    • 7 Pages

    12 Angry Men: Overview

    1. Each Act takes happens in the same place. The entire play takes place in the jury room of a New York City court of law in 1957 during a very hot summer afternoon. It is a large, dull, minimalistic room with three windows in the brick wall which the skyline of New York City can be seen. There is also a wash room and lavatory off the jury room. There is a large, scarred table in the centre with twelve chairs around it. There are pencils pads and an ashtray on the table. There is also a water cooler in the room with plastic cups. The dullness of the room may signify and provide a mood for the act and is evident in the interactions between the jurors. The Twelve jurors are all seemingly awkward and uneasy towards each other once they enter the room.…

    • 1553 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Twelve Angry Men Analysis
    • 664 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Twelve Angry Men Analysis

    In the movie twelve angry man, after the twelve jurors listened to the facts in the trail, the judge gives her instructions to them. The judge told them that the man could face the death penalty if he found guilty. The 12 man gather in a stifling hot room to have a concluding about the case. They start arguing and adding their own experience, culture, and understanding of people's motives as a way of reconsidering the facts. Although all the jurors had listened to the same stated facts and they were in the same situation, each one of them interprets the facts differently. This reflects the differences in people and the different ways that we view the same things.…

    • 664 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Henry Fonda's Use Of Groupthink In 12 Angry Men
    • 1676 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Henry Fonda's Use Of Groupthink In 12 Angry Men

    The movie 12 Angry Men depicts a typical scene today: twelve jury members meeting to discuss a case presented to them and determine guilt or innocence of a young man accused of killing his own father. Usually the jury room is a place for discussion and debate, but the evidence has swayed all but one of the jurors into voting guilty. The group in the movie is a jury of 12 men with various backgrounds and age groups. They were placed in a deliberation room where the entire move took place.…

    • 1676 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Sociology: Lost Letter, Poverty, Marriage
    • 2755 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Sociology: Lost Letter, Poverty, Marriage

    Before the presidential election, between Barak Obama and Mitt Romney, we were assigned a group project. In this project we had to secretively leave a “lost letter” on the ground, for a random person to walk by, in a public area, and at COD, and observe the outcome. The letters contained nothing of importance, but simply stamped with either presidential candidate, and addressed to our professor. We had to record weather or not the passerby’s did any of the following: Glance, Ignore, Stop and look, Picked up the letter, etc. Following the results of the pedestrians, we were supposed to hand them a survey that asked them personal political questions. Some of the questions were the political position they stood closest to weather that was Democratic, independent, and republican, none or something other than the following. Another question was which candidate they were leaning towards in the 2012 election, Obama, Romney, or neither. They were asked what their reaction was to our “lost letter’ and if they were walking alone or with someone else. They finally were asked if they had any relation to College Of Dupage and if they were interested in receiving the results of this study.…

    • 2755 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    12 Angry Men Essay
    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages

    12 Angry Men Essay

    The movie "12 Angry Men" focuses on a jury's decision on a capital murder case. A 12-man jury is sent to begin decisions on the first-degree murder trial of an 18-year-old Latino accused of stabbing his father to death, where a guilty verdict means an automatic death sentence. The case appears to be open-and-shut: The defendant has a weak alibi; a knife he claimed to have lost is found at the murder scene; and several witnesses either heard screaming, saw the killing or the boy fleeing the scene. Eleven of the jurors immediately vote guilty; only Juror No. 8 (Mr. Davis) casts a not guilty vote. At first Mr. Davis' bases his vote more so for the sake of discussion after all, the jurors must believe beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty. As the movie unfolds, the story quickly becomes a study of the jurors' complex personalities and how they deal with argumentation within groups and critical thinking. This allows Mr. Davis to try and convince the other jury members that the defendant might not be guilty by using cooperative argumentation, claim, evidence, warrant, facts, etc.…

    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Write An Essay On Groupthink And 9/11
    • 1079 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Write An Essay On Groupthink And 9/11

    Group decision making can be very helpful in getting different thoughts and opinions out of discussion, but also can be dangerous because of groupthink. Groupthink occurs when people avoid individually testing, analyzing, and evaluating facts in order to avoid upsetting the consensus of a group. In effect a conflict occurs whereby some topics are okay to discuss while others are closed often without the group being consciously aware of it. Those who violate the unspoken rules often find themselves being ostracized, alienated and ultimately expelled from the group.…

    • 1079 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Group Dynamics of Twelve Angry Men
    • 5854 Words
    • 24 Pages

    Group Dynamics of Twelve Angry Men

    I'm not sure what background information you are supposed to know on this. Certainly any discord among the jurors makes tension. You need a collective jury to to hand down a verdict. These jurors are hot, tired, and upset. A group will naturally look favourably to strong evidence that will end the trial. Any discord could convince other jurors to change their mind and shift the group dynamics.…

    • 5854 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Analysis Of 12 Angry Men
    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Analysis Of 12 Angry Men

    For fans of courtroom dramas and crime television, these court case movies all revolve around the courtroom. Unlike the orderly process of a real courtroom, the stories are filled with drama, intrigue and corruption. Getting to the truth is seldom as straightforward as it appears within these hit movies.…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Chapter 6 Study Questions
    • 1594 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Chapter 6 Study Questions

    The process of groupthink is when one feels that membership in a particular group is important, the individual may allow the group to pressure them into pushing one’s own values aside and rationalize or…

    • 1594 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Arguments Against Groupthink
    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Arguments Against Groupthink

    According to study.com website (2015), a groupthink can simply be defined as an occurrence that gives a group of people a fault verdict or a conclusion a that a group has made that is an ineffective decision whereby it was reached just to appease the spirit of harmony among group members than allowing individuals to act independently and creatively. As alluded on, groupthink blocks individual creativity by ignoring alternatives allowing irrational actions to tale precedence. It happens most when individuals have similar background and the group is refusing external opinions. The result are that the decisions are flawed and they often come at a cost.…

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Given Orders, Soldiers Destroy Civilians’ Homes and Kill Despite the Fact That These Acts Are Immoral and Brutal. Explain These Behaviors Based on Your Understanding of Conformity and Obedience.
    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Given Orders, Soldiers Destroy Civilians’ Homes and Kill Despite the Fact That These Acts Are Immoral and Brutal. Explain These Behaviors Based on Your Understanding of Conformity and Obedience.

    Conformity within a group entails members changing their attitudes and beliefs because of real or imagined social pressure in order to match those of others within the group. (Passer & Smith, 2003)…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    12 Angry Men Conformity
    • 1218 Words
    • 5 Pages

    12 Angry Men Conformity

    The behaviour of individuals in any large dynamic group naturally exhibits various signs of either conscious or subconscious conformity. The psychological principle of conformity which related to social influence basically refers to an exertion on the will of the affected individual to act in a manner that is not in accordance with one¡¦s actual beliefs. Many different studies of conformity as a result of social influence have been conducted which reveal that almost all conformist responses to social influence can be narrowed down to three distinctive types: compliance, identification and internalization. This paper will use 12 Angry Men as a case study on the dynamics of social influence, especially the influence of individual nonconformist,…

    • 1218 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Stereotypes In Twelve Angry Men
    • 148 Words
    • 1 Page

    Stereotypes In Twelve Angry Men

    People will always be prejudices, everyone has their own morals. Everyone will be judged by the cover, not by what is going on. Many people have their own perspectives on what they support.…

    • 148 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    12 Angry Men: Conflict & Negotiation
    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages

    12 Angry Men: Conflict & Negotiation

    Our team chose “12 Angry Men” (1957) because it contains numerous examples of conflict and negotiation. The presentation we have designed shows the relationship between parts of the movie and the concepts in our textbook. There were so many examples throughout the film that so we chose a select few clips to relate to conflict and negotiation.…

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Communication In 12 Angry Men
    • 1027 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Communication In 12 Angry Men

    The film “12 Angry Men” is a 1957 drama consisting of a dozen men on jury, who attempt to reach a verdict involving a teenager in a murder case. A guilty verdict was initially predicted, but the jury members start questioning and reasoning the testimonies given in court. Was the boy being accused of stabbing his father really guilty? All the information regarding the timing of the train, the timing of the murder, and the testimonies did not add up. Through much debate, a complex voting process, and many concepts learned through SCOM, the jury managed to attain a not-guilty ruling due to the inadequate testimonies and facts gathered.…

    • 1027 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics