Gun Control laws have been discussed more and more now due to more recent tragedies because of gun violence. James Q. Wilson, previous a professor of Pepperdine University, UCLA, and an author of many public policy books, wrote and editorial letter trying to convince his intended audience that if the government passes more gun control laws it will not decrease the gun violence in America as much as society wants to believe it will. The LA Times published this editorial in 2007 and it is still a good resource.…
The role guns play in our society has long been a controversial topic for the past few years in the united states. There are those who believe that guns do not belong in the hands of citizens and there are those who believe that guns are the foundation that protects our rights and liberties stated in the Constitution. There are too many leading factors as to why there should not be any stricter gun control laws. Some of these factors are that they go against our fundamental rights of self defense, give too much power to the government, and could potentially increase crime rates in the united states.…
Before addressing the viewpoints and the positive and negative effects, understanding what gun control is should be the first step. According to Dictionary.com, Gun Control is, "An effort to fight violent crime by strengthening laws on the ownership of firearms.” Guns are more likely to result in a death, than a knife or other weapons and people own them for the protection of items, hunting, or other reasons (Zimring). While it may be an effort to stop murders and injuries, it will not stop people from…
For the last couple of years, gun control has continued to be a huge controversial debate in Congress. This argument over whether gun control laws should be strict is nothing new to the world of politics. The ideas of gun control consist of laws that either keep away firearms from people, or allow one to keep guns for personal protection. They also control who the guns are being sold to and who can own them. In America, each state government has passed many gun control laws. Many people think that gun control is right because they think keeping people away from guns will reduce the amount of deaths each year. They also think that guns cause many of the deaths that had been committed each year. Whenever people hear the word gun, the thoughts…
The debate over the restrictions of gun control is centered on the Second Amendment to the Constitution, which gives people the right to bear arms. Gun control supporters believe that this explicit right does not extend to ownership of military-style firearms. For example, groups like the National Rifle Association argue that gun control infringes on the constitutional rights of law-abiding citizens. Gun control is an on-going debate because each year more people are killed by the use of guns. However, guns are not the result in the number of homicides each year, the problems rests with the irresponsible gun users. Gun Control would do nothing but harm America because guns offer protection and security…
There is a big controversy about whether or not to have control over guns. One side of the controversy is that no citizen is allowed to have a gun in the house hold, only allowing the Army, Cops, and anyone with that power over the country. You also have the other side that the citizens are on, where many of the citizens use firearms for hunting, safety, and many other things. How could we take away firearms when so many people have and use them, “In the United States every 100 people 88.8% have firearms.” (ProCon.org “Gun Control ProCon.org”,1) The main reason the government is thinking to have gun control, is to decrease the lives that are getting taken away by these powerful tools that we use to have fun. Many people…
A. The fundamental flaw in the thinking of anti-gun politicians is that guns don't kill people. People kill people.…
These three essays on the topic of gun control, “Both Sides Have Something to Fear” by David Ropeik, “We Can Ratchet Down the Passions” by Adam Winkler, and “A Divide Widened by Misunderstanding” by David Kopel, have many similarities in their views and opinions of the gun debate; i.e. to have gun rights or gun control. Not only their viewpoints, or lack thereof rather, but their timing from when these essays were written and their use of emotional ethos to grab the audience’s attention are all very similar. There also are a lot of differences between these three essays, such as who is in charge of the debate, and what caused the debate in the first place.…
Gun Control Many Americans believe that gun control is a good thing for the United States ,but how much good can it really do? Although more gun control laws can reduce gun deaths and lead to fewer suicides, gun controls laws would not be a good idea for the United States because they violate the right to self-defense, put more criminals in business, won’t prevent criminals from obtaining guns or breaking laws and many other reasons. The first reason gun controls laws are not a good idea is because it violates the right to self defense.…
They believe the laws that are in place are effective and need to become stricter. “To date, this system [Brady Bill] has prevented more than 200,000 gun purchases by people who had been in mental institutions, been dishonorably discharged from military service, were fugitives, or had a history of domestic abuse" (“Gun control,” World of Health, par. 35). For this reason, opponents argue that more and stricter gun control laws will result in less gun violence. It may be true that gun control laws help reduce gun violence. However, more and stricter gun control laws will reduce one’s Second Amendment rights. “...gun advocates favor freedom, choice and self-responsibility. If someone wishes to be prepared to defend himself, he should be free to do so. No one has the right to deprive others of the means of effective self-defense such as a handgun" (Stossel, par. 3). Not only would more and stricter gun control laws be unconstitutional, they would also be just as ineffective as the ones in place already. It is impossible to stop every single criminal from getting a gun. Gun control advocates often ignore that guns can save lives. “Today there are more than 300 million legally owned guns in America, and there were roughly 350,000 violent crimes involving firearms in 2011. In other words, the number of legal guns in private hands went up by a third, while the number of firearm-related crimes dropped by 74 percent." (Domenech, par. 24). The only thing that will stop gun violence is another person with a gun. More gun control laws are not the answer because criminals do not follow the laws that are in place…
Why are people so passionate about gun control? They seem to strongly agree with gun control. Gun control is not going to stop the criminal from buying guns. Gun control is going to making the shootings worse because the criminals will start robbing places to get guns.…
Supporters of gun control reform say, “The high rate of violent shootings in the United States can be traced to the country’s lax stance on gun legislation.” ("Gun Control Reform.") If there were bans on certain weapons a shooter will not have access to gun they want or have already used. “Since the current laws are too lax, it allows dangerous people to acquire deadly weapons with little or no hindrance. ("Update: Gun Control.") If the country had stricter laws against some guns or stricter background checks there could be a decrease in gun violence. Therefore putting restrictions on guns will save lives of American citizens and decrease…
Gun control has been a controversial and highly contentious subject for quite some time. People against gun control feel like owning a gun is protected by their constitutional rights. They feel very strongly about their right to own a fire arm and believe strongly that gun control laws only restrict the rights of law abiding citizens. People who support gun control laws feel that guns are the primary cause of violent crime in America, and that stricter gun laws will help keep guns off the streets and prevent crime. Even though gun control laws are getting more restrictive, they have not proven…
First, before discussing gun control itself we must understand the 2nd Amendment. The 2nd Amendment states, "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a Free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms,…