In many instances, handguns are bought off of the black market and if they are not bought on the black market, “most handguns used in crimes are stolen and passed frequently from criminal to criminal” (Wright 1). If stricter gun laws are put in place, criminals will still have access to guns because the laws will not affect the means by which they obtain their weapons which allows these criminals to still commit a mass murder. Also, the law-abiding citizens will not have weapons because the stricter gun laws will take weapons away from them, which will make the citizens more vulnerable to these criminals that have access to guns. Increasing gun control laws is not the solution to stopping mass murders. Stricter gun laws will only increase the rate of mass murders because the people will remain …show more content…
The opposition argue that the United States should tighten gun laws because the Columbine shooter, “had no difficulty obtaining the high-capacity assault weapons that was used in his rampage” (Blek 3). However, these supporters of gun laws must understand that in these types of murders, the killer does not obtain their weapon legally, in fact the Columbine shooter stole the guns from his mother’s house. The opposition also argues that, “Large capacity firearms magazines enable murderers to kill large numbers of victims” (Wright 1). However, these opponents need to note that, “It is what is in the heart of a mass murderer, not what is in their hand, that determines their lethality” (Wright 1). Even if the United States tightens gun laws, mass murders will still take place because it is what is in the murderer’s heart that makes them deadly and they do not obtain their weapons legally most of the