Moreover, firearms are all provided by the Department of Defense and prohibits guards members from owning guns in their homes (Bowman and Newton 2). Nullifying this nexus between military service and gun membership, the federal government essentially restricted the free interpretation of the Second Amendment and the purpose of the Second Amendment as proposed by the Founding Fathers. Additionally, the claim that stricter gun laws would only make it harder for the good samaritan to obtain guns to protect themselves is a counter argument that is absolutely illogical. Stricter laws would it make it safer for the good citizen to obtain guns as it would decrease the threat of criminals getting their hands on firearms and guarantee that only citizens who have exhibited model behaviour and do not have any impeding past criminal records are allowed
Moreover, firearms are all provided by the Department of Defense and prohibits guards members from owning guns in their homes (Bowman and Newton 2). Nullifying this nexus between military service and gun membership, the federal government essentially restricted the free interpretation of the Second Amendment and the purpose of the Second Amendment as proposed by the Founding Fathers. Additionally, the claim that stricter gun laws would only make it harder for the good samaritan to obtain guns to protect themselves is a counter argument that is absolutely illogical. Stricter laws would it make it safer for the good citizen to obtain guns as it would decrease the threat of criminals getting their hands on firearms and guarantee that only citizens who have exhibited model behaviour and do not have any impeding past criminal records are allowed