Preview

Habeas Corpus

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1490 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Habeas Corpus
Habeas Corpus is known as the Great Writ because it ensures that a person detained by the government is entitled to a judicial hearing to determine if there is any legal basis for their detention. The modern form of Habeas Corpus has evolved over the years, from it beginnings in England, to its addition to the US constitution. While Habeas Corpus pertains to every citizen that is tried in a US court, there is an argument as to weather habeas also applies to alien prisoners that are being held by the US government, on foreign land. In 2002, The Supreme Court began to get involved in this argument, considering the level of the war on terror was high and the Bush Administration had just developed GITMO prison. The argument between the President and the Supreme Court continue today. The question that needs to be answered is: should aliens that are under U.S. detainment on foreign land be entitled the right of habeas corpus? The term habeas corpus was first used in England in the 14th century, but didn’t become official until the 1679 Habeas Corpus Act was passed in Great Britain. Prior to the Revolutionary War, British soldiers were holding colonist without allowing them to exercise their right of habeas corpus. This was one reason that sparked the Revolutionary War. As a result, the founding fathers of America added habeas corpus to The Constitution of the United States, saying that "The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it" (Article 1, Section 9) (The Columbia Encyclopedia. 2011, p.1). To this day, citizens that have been charged with a crime enjoy the right of habeas corpus, usually in federal appeals. Habeas Corpus protects the civil liberty of citizens, as it assures them a chance to be heard by the highest court in the land. In contemporary America, as it relates to the war on terror, habeas corpus has been suspended in some cases, especially

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    An assumption made by the Bush administration in selecting this location was that it was beyond the jurisdiction of U.S. courts. The administration wanted to avoid any judicial oversight of how it handled detainees, characterized as “enemy combatants.” A possible legal challenge to indefinite detention with no formal charges or judicial proceedings might arise from the habeas corpus provision of the Constitution.…

    • 6132 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The writ of habeas corpus is when you get arrested and you say “writ of habeas corpus” to be brought to a judge so he could tell you why you’ve been arrested. If there is no reason to be arrested, then, you are free to leave. It was made for people who didn’t even know why they were sent to jail. They just got arrested one day and didn’t know what they did wrong.…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Miranda v. Arizona case is considered to be one of the most important and famous cases in modern law history that provided the foundation for some important legal provisions. It occurred in 1966 in Arizona, when a young man named Ernesto Miranda, a Mexican immigrant living in Phoenix, Arizona, was charged with robbery, kidnapping, and rape of a young woman several years prior the trial (Zalman, 2010). Before the suspect was interrogated, the police did not inform him of his constitutional right to remain silent which allowed the interrogators to get the confession. Given that this case provided the foundation for the right to remain silent, it became very famous and important. The present paper attempts to analyze the…

    • 140 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Article I, Section 9 of the Constitution states, “The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it.” Under this provision, persons detained by the government are entitled to a judicial hearing to determine if…

    • 36699 Words
    • 107 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Habeas corpus- the principle that no person can be held in prison without being charged with a specific crime…

    • 334 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The framers of the Constitution sought that the writ shall be included in the body of the Constitution in Article I, Section 9, stating that, “The privilege of the writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in case of Rebellion or invasion the public safety may require it.” (site) Abraham Lincoln believed and respected the Constitution and the traditional separation of powers, however he did not feel that the framers of the Constitution intended to wait for Congress to come together to make a decision in a time of crisis. President Lincoln did not want to get rid of the writ of Habeas Corpus because prior to becoming the president he had served in congress and was a lawyer himself and therefore he understood it’s meaning and importance. (site) Suspending the writ of Habeas Corpus was not an easy decision made by Lincoln, yet as the commander in Chief of the United States it was his duty to protect the country in these extreme circumstances of protests and…

    • 326 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    The historical evolution of habeas corpus born from the Magna Carta, known as the English Bill of Rights began in England in the early 1200s. Under force from English barons, King John of England placed his signature on the Magna Carta in 1215, in which comprised of a list of human rights and civil liberties. It asserted that the King needed consent from his legislative body to impose taxes upon its citizens. Halliday (2011) notes that habeas corpus serves as a writ and a scrabble parchment that a judge ordered a jailer to bring forth a named prisoner to court to face said written charges. This very important document additionally established that trial and due process of law must occur previous to confiscating property or freedom from any free man who resided in England. Instead of King John stepping down from power he agreed to place…

    • 1857 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hedgepeth V. Roberts Case

    • 2241 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Bush, the Court held that federal courts had jurisdiction to hear habeas corpus petitions brought by detainees at the Guantanamo Bay detainment camp. Scalia accused the majority of "spring[ing] a trap on the Executive" by ruling that it could hear cases involving persons at Guantanamo when no federal court had ever ruled that it had the authority to hear cases involving people there. Scalia (joined by Justice John Paul Stevens) also dissented in the 2004 case of Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, involving Yaser Hamdi, an American citizen detained in the United States on the allegation he was an enemy combatant. The Court held that the post-9/11 congressional Authorization for the Use of Military Force (AUMF) amounted to authorization for the suspension of the writ of habeas corpus and the Government could continue to detain Hamdi. Scalia wrote that the AUMF could not be read to suspend habeas corpus and that the Court, faced with legislation by Congress which did not grant the President power to detain…

    • 2241 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Habeas Corpus in Latin, means, “You have the body.” According to our text habeas corpus means, “a demand by a court to a jailer to produce the prisoner and announce the charges” (Waldman-Levin, 2012, 5.7). In my opinion for most Americans, habeas corpus protects a prisoner and it also allows a prisoner to indicate that his/her constitution guarantees rights to a fair trial. “From a political point of view, the great value of habeas corpus is that it protects citizens from a dangerous tendency which is generally found in those who exercise the powers of government” (S. G. F., 1888, pg. 454). Habeas corpus is important when it comes to a prisoner questioning why he/she is being held or imprisoned. The Habeas Corpus Act was formed in 1679 and is used to keep an individual from being unlawfully imprisoned.…

    • 1396 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Habeas Corpus prevented the government from accusing and arresting people for no valid reason and it was unconstitutional for Lincoln to suspend it. The Supreme Court ruled the suspension of the writ of habeas corpus as unconstitutional by saying, "the attention of the country has been called to the proposition that one who is sworn to ‘take care that the laws be faithfully executed,' should not himself violate them." Lincoln argued that he had a right to suspend the writ of habeas corpus because " the privilege of the writ of habeas corpus, shall not be suspended unless when, in the cases of rebellion or invasion, the public safety may require it." What better crisis is there then a time of war, and because Lincoln never accepted the states' secession, he viewed the war as an act of rebellion. By viewing the war as an act of rebellion, Lincoln was well within the right of the constitution to suspend the writ of habeas corpus.…

    • 1308 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    First, individual liberties and freedoms are important since without them one can be held indefinitely. Habeas corpus also known as the “great writ of liberty” guarantees that a person who is being held unjustly can go free (Habeas corpus, 2011). This is one of the reasons that make America so great because anyone who is detained can know the reason why they are being held and in so are allowed due process under the law. The Constitution protects the…

    • 2236 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Miranda vs Arizona

    • 1189 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Bill of Rights guarantees that everyone has the right to due process. The U.S. Supreme Court’s landmark case Miranda v. Arizona 384 U.S. 436 (1966) changed our due process by adding additional procedures to how law enforcement handles a suspect and ensuring they know their rights as American citizens.…

    • 1189 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The right of writs of habeas corpus are granted in Article I, Section 9, clause 2 of the…

    • 1056 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This was especially crucial to maintain in the judicial system. In the past, corrupt and powerful people could accuse a person of a crime and lock them in jail without ever charging them. The writ of habeas corpus does not allow this to happen anymore. This forces law enforcement and other persons in power to bring the accused before a judge or into a court. Without this writ, the government would have essentially endless power at the hands of the judicial system.…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    “Habeas Corpus is an ancient common law prerogative writ - a legal procedure to which you have an undeniable right.” (Robertson, 2002). It comes from the Anglo-Saxon common law origin. The Precise of the origin is still unknown, but it still has been used. “Although practice surrounding the writ has evolved over time, Habeas Corpus has since the earliest times been employed to compel the appearance of a person who is in custody to be brought before a court.” (Robertson, 2002). The British colony brought habeas corpus from England and has been used in the United States since the American Revolutionary War. Habeas corpus is found in the United States Constitution in Article One, Section Nine, under congress limits. It states that “the Habeas Corpus should not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it.”(Neuman,…

    • 861 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays