I didn’t read many responses which stated that “stacking deck” was a form of logical fallacy that Harrop included in her essay, so reading about it was a unique view—I didn’t really see it in the essay until I read your response! It’s excessively common for advertisers or political candidates to argue using only data supporting their side of the argument. Though it may see as if doing so would make one’s argument more effective, it only weakens the argument. As you mentioned, including a counterargument in her essay would have made Harrop’s argument would further its effectiveness because it would help the reader understand
I didn’t read many responses which stated that “stacking deck” was a form of logical fallacy that Harrop included in her essay, so reading about it was a unique view—I didn’t really see it in the essay until I read your response! It’s excessively common for advertisers or political candidates to argue using only data supporting their side of the argument. Though it may see as if doing so would make one’s argument more effective, it only weakens the argument. As you mentioned, including a counterargument in her essay would have made Harrop’s argument would further its effectiveness because it would help the reader understand