Preview

Hate Speech in Colleges

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1613 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Hate Speech in Colleges
Hate Speech Codes: Ineffective and Unconstitutional Even though there has been a large increase in the number of hate speech codes in colleges and universities, the increase in the amount of hate speech incidents across the nation shows that these guidelines are ineffective. While hate speech codes attempt to create a safer more politically correct environment on college campuses by establishing principles and guidelines for students to follow, they are inherently ineffective because they are only attempting to cover up hate speech and are not addressing the root of the problem-hate. Also, they contradict the First Amendment of the United States constitution which entitles everyone to freedom of speech. Hate speech codes are merely guidelines and principles. In order to make a real difference in the atmosphere of today 's increasingly multicultural college campuses, college administrators and student leaders must work together to combat ignorance and create a respectful more tolerant environment by changing the mindset of students.
Hate speech refers to any expression that intends to degrade, intimidate, or incite violence or prejudicial action against a group of people based on their race, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual orientation, or disability(wikipedia) . Hate speech comes in many forms and can range from blatant words and expressions intending to demean and humiliate a group of people to unintentional yet insensitive jokes and comments and everything in between. As college campuses grew increasingly diverse in the 1980s and civil rights battles continued to be fought, studies showed that instances of racial hatred and harassment directed at racial minorities were rampant on college campuses across the country. In response, many public colleges and universities under pressure to respond to these concerns, immediately adopted policies that banned such expressions that offended any group based on race, gender, ethnicity, religion, or sexual



Bibliography: "Hate Speech on Campus." 12/31/94 . Meyer, Elizabeth. "Free Speech Means Allowing Hate Speech." OSU Daily Barometer (2006) Hudson, David. "Free Speech on Public College Campuses." Hate Speech and Campus Speech Codes . Uelmen, Gerald. "The Price of Free Speech:Campus Hate Codes." Issues in Ethics - V. 5, N. 2 Summer 1992.. "We want Progress,not Principles." Iowa State Daily 2006 Jacobson, Jennifer. "Civil Rights Panel Urges Federal Monitoring." The Chronicle of Higher Education 2006 " 'Hate Speech ' on Campus." (2001) . Bartlett, Katharine T. and O 'Barr, Jean (1990) The Chilly Climate on College Campuses: An Expansion of the "Hate Speech" Debate. Duke Law Journal 39:574-586. "Policy on Hateful Incidents." Office of Equal Opportunity and Multicultural Policy May 2006 .

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Silvergate notes that limiting free speech would fall to the responsibility of college administrators who will undoubtedly over censor due to the broad harassment regulations the proposed bill contains. He supports this point by adding that the Individual Rights Foundation, FIRE already claims harassment as “the most abused tool to limit free speech.”…

    • 322 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1989, a court case Doe v. The University of Michigan, was held in a U.S District Court to determine if the University of Michigan’s speech codes on hate speech were violating First Amendment rights. John Doe, a former student at the University of Michigan, declared that speech codes were in fact, infringing upon his education by restricting him from conducting controversial topics that some students deemed offensive. Overall, the case was decided by a majority vote by the U.S District Court in favor of Doe because the court issued that the University of Michigan's policy was unconstitutionally overbroad. Many verdicts like these intend to show that losing a right does not stop once a student has stepped on a college campus.…

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In “Protecting Freedom of Expression on the Campus”, the author, Derek Bok shows how expressing yourself falls under the First Amendment, whether it is on a private college campus or public college campus. He further explains that just because it is protected by law does not mean that it is “right, proper, or civil. Bok goes on to show how censoring freedom of speech would cause people to “test the limits” to gain more attention than is needed and if dealt with in the proper manner, behaviors such as displaying a Confederate flag or a swastika in rebuttal of the flag can be avoided. Freedom of expression is a right and should not…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the articles "Mob Rule on College Campuses" by Cinnamon Stillwell and "Speech Codes: Alive and Well at Colleges" by Harvey A. Silverglate and Greg Lukianoff describe college issues involving the freedom of speech. Both of these articles talk about how freedom of speech can cause many problems in college. Even though these articles are on the same topic, they are on very different forms of freedom of speech. In "Mob Rule on College Campus and in "Speech Codes: Alive and Well at Colleges" both talk about how there is harassment all throughout colleges. But the two pieces of literature talk about two different ways of harassment. Both of the…

    • 901 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mizzou Free Speech

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the article, Mizzou, Yale, and Free Speech, Nicholas Krsitof discusses today’s most sensitive issue: racism. His audience is the people of the United States so he is sure to pull out all of the most controversial issues. He carefully tip-toes around the subject of racism when he shifts the focus from racism and points his readers towards accepting all forms of diversity. He incorporates the need for acceptance of diversity and the increasing cry for the first amendment, also known as, freedom of speech. He attempts to cover every perspective in his article when he goes from the point of view of a liberal, a Christian, and even a transgender person. He argues that there is diversity so that we can challenge each other and in the words of Kristof, “Education is about stretching muscles.”…

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the United States of America and in almost all countries, there are laws against harassment, libel, threats, and incitement to commit crimes. These speech codes are for the safety of citizens and are often used to suppress hate speech in private institutions and in the workplace. Speech codes should be allowed on college campuses in order to create a safe environment for people of different sexes, races, sexual orientation, religions, and classes, and to provide an equal learning environment for all by limiting the freedom of speech.…

    • 1668 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    College Censorship Rules

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages

    “Crippling the delivery of unpopular views is a terrible lesson to send to impressionable minds and future leaders” (Rampell 1). This quote taken from Catherine Rampell in her article “Free speech is flunking out on college campuses” explains that strict censorship rules hurt students whose minds are still developing. Rules on censorship in a college setting are supposed to protect the rights of students. Censorship is supposed to protect them from extremely hate filled speeches, newspaper articles, and other documents. For example, defamation, lies, and uses of extremely hateful name calling such as the word “nigger,” are all applicable to fair censorship rules. Today, the power of censorship has grown strong. In a scramble to not offend anyone,…

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Teaching the N- Word

    • 922 Words
    • 4 Pages

    For centuries, racism has been defined by the face of man and the skin color that coats it. Derogatory terms, such as the N-word, dehumanize minority races, maintaining a mental acceptance and continuing segregation throughout society. As most can concur, the N-word holds a unique title within the English vocabulary. In such order, it is extremely taboo to the extent where it is not even whispered in a conservative atmosphere. On the other hand, younger generations exploit the N-word so frequently in various expressions that it has taken on a new life beyond its origins of insult. Nonetheless, Dr. Emily Bernard, a black American professor, wanted to leave a lasting impression on her students as she expressed in her article “Teaching the N-Word.” Was teaching the N-word to her all-white lectures viewed as admirable or arrogant in regard to her initial purpose? In fact, her intentions of “teaching and transforming” her students were extremely admirable in this case because she allowed her students to learn and relate beyond the use of the N-word through receptivity, defense, and advocacy tactics throughout the semester.…

    • 922 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Milo Yiannopoulos’ tendency to say whatever will create the most outrage and attention is dangerous to have at institutions that promote open-mindedness and learning. Not only do the things he says cause violent reactions, like the shooting at the University of Washington or the riot at Berkeley, but it also encourages an “us versus them” mentality throughout the campuses. The “us” being Milo’s supporters, a predominantly white and male group, and the “them” being the groups they direct their hate to, feminist, LGBTQ, and minorities. Beth McMurtrie mentions in her article “How to Promote Free Speech Without Alienating Students?,” that after being labeled as a “radical professor” by Yiannopoulos, Valerie Johnson of DePaul University “received a barrage of hateful messages” from Milo’s supporters. Colleges should be supporting inclusiveness, not allowing someone like Milo to further fuel the…

    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lawrence expresses concern that allowance of hate speech normalizes the treatment of minority groups as second class citizens and can potentially give rise to increasing displays of verbal and physical aggression. In the 27 years since the essay’s publication he has been proven right by my estimation, which concerns over political correctness and censorship increasing the number of spaces in which slurs and ethnic stereotyping are considered acceptable. This has resulted in an increased visible presence of groups using exclusionary and fascist rhetoric in public political consciousness, which in recent years has led to increased concessions to these groups in both media and legislation. Counter intuitively I do not think this has decreased or increased the number of people who hold views that could be considered hateful in nature, merely allowed them to enjoy greater focus under the permissiveness of those who might otherwise contradict these views with enough determination to silence them.…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Hate Crime

    • 398 Words
    • 2 Pages

    There has been an ongoing issue of hate crime in America. Surprisingly, there are many factors that can constitute a hate crime. It is important to not only review hate crime itself, but also the person committing the hate crime and how it can be prevented. Hate crime is a broad topic and has been interpreted differently by many. There are policies and laws in place in an effort to stop hate crime, yet it is still a prominent issue that is increasing rapidly in America today. The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) defines hate crime as, “bias against race, religion, disability, sexual orientation, ethnicity, gender, or gender identity” (Hate Crimes). It is critical to understand that someone is being biased when they commit a hate crime,…

    • 398 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hate Speech In America

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I feel that hate speech has already had a major effect on our country and needs to be put to an end. If a person feels comfortable enough to share comments about others that are violent and hateful, they may feel that it is ok to do harm to those individuals. In the news, there are many stories on hate speech that lead to hate crimes.…

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hate Speech

    • 869 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Lawmakers have made provisions for libel and slander that makes the acts illegal to defame individuals in a song, speech, or writing. In 2012, Doskow states that defamation is a tort, meaning that this is more of a civil matter than criminal; therefore, people in society may say publicly that not all speeches are negative to any group as a hate speech. However, the church or religious groups have opposed the homosexually lifestyle because their doctrine teaches against the lifestyle. In the United States, religious groups have the right to speak and protest against the homosexual lifestyle; therefore, what is the meaning of this word hate speech he or she may ask? The American Heritage Dictionary online (2011)…

    • 869 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    College students that belong to the majority group usually aren’t fond of being told that their unintentional actions mean they’re actually a racist. Conversely, those who support these checks on language grow more angry, discouraged that their majority counterparts cannot agree with strict rules on communication. Whenever something offensive is spoken, students adopt a victimized sense of self, creating a tirade of upheaval. Rather than developing mob mentality, calling for major change, peaceful discussion should instead be…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hate Speech

    • 2166 Words
    • 9 Pages

    This paper will address some of the issues surrounding hate speech and its regulation. I will explain both Andrew Altman and Jonathan Rauch's positions in the first two sections. The third section will be on what Altman might say to Rauch's opposite views. I will then discuss my view that hate speech should never be regulated under any circumstance especially in the name of protecting someone's psychology, feelings, or insecurities like Altman prescribes. In the end, I will conclude that we should not agree with Altman despite his well intentioned moral convictions to push for hate speech regulation. Although hate speech is a horrible act, people must learn to overcome and persevere through difficult situations and not leave it to the law to protect their feelings and insecurities.…

    • 2166 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics