Although the names were changed the principal was concerned that the students may be able to recognize the identity of the girls who were interviewed for the pregnancy article. As a result, Reynolds simply published a version of the newspaper that didn't include those two stories. However, he made the decision discussing them with his supervisors of the school but didn't give the students a chance to address the …show more content…
On January 13,1988 the Supreme Court decided that the principal's actions did not violate the students freedom of speech. The court stated that the paper was sponsored by the school and the school had the right in preventing the publication of articles that seemed inappropriate. In other words, the Court stated that the paper was not intended as a public newspaper in which everyone can read and express their views. Clearly, it was a limited newspaper for journalism students to write articles for the requirements of the journalism II class, and the school had the write to edit anything