Preview

History

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1948 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
History
Non – cooperation movement
The Non-Cooperation Movement was a significant phase of the Indian struggle for freedom from British rule. It was led by Mahatma Gandhi and was supported by the Indian National Congress. It aimed to resist British occupation in India through non-violent means. Protestors and followers followed the swadeshi and boycott movement. The ideals of Ahimsa or non-violence had mass movement on a very large scale was seen for the first time.
Among the significant causes of this movement were colonial oppression, exemplified by the Rowlatt Act and Jallianwala Bagh massacre, economic hardships to the common man due to a large chunk of Indian wealth being exported to Britain, ruin of Indian artisans due to British factory-made goods replacing handmade goods, and popular resentment with the British over Indian soldiers dying in World War I while fighting as part of the British Army, in battles that otherwise had nothing to do with India.
The calls of early political leaders like Mohammad Ali Jinnah (who later became communal and hardened his stand), Annie Besant and Bal Gangadhar Tilak (Congress Extremists) for home rule were accompanied only by petitions and major public meetings. They never resulted in disorder or obstruction of government services. Partly due to that, the British did not take them very seriously. The non-cooperation movement aimed to ensure that the colonial economic and power structure would be seriously challenged, and British authorities would be forced to take notice of the people's demands.Here we should know that many revolutionaries like Bhagat Singh, Chandra Shekhar Azad were supporters of this very movement but were really dissatisfied by the dismissing of movement by Gandhi.
Mahatma Gandhi had shown a similar movement in South Africa and in 1917-18 in Champaran, Bihar and Kheda, Gujarat that the only way to earn the respect and attention of British officials was to actively resist government activities through civil

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    With many politicians believing the British were civilising the peoples of periphery, the British probably believed the peoples of the American colonies needed to be taught to respect the metropole, which believed it had a parent role. In contrast, in the Indian case acts of resistance had yield some success. It could, however, be argued that the war a make factor in this success. As Fieldhouse points out: Stafford Cripps promised India dominion status ‘to rally Indian opinion in the crisis caused by Japan’s entry into the war’ (Secondary Source 19.2, 2015, p.10). As well as the civil disobedience, which was part of the ‘Quit India’ campaign, the British were also concerned about the Japanese-back ‘Indian National Army’ who had have some military success. In this context, then, the British high likely perceived those whom taken in the civil disobedience as moderates. As Indian support was needed to fight Japan, the British probably felt placating moderates was a small price to pay considering the circumstances. Therefore, the circumstances of war played in a major factor in Indian progress towards…

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gandhi Dbq Analysis

    • 548 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Gandhi used civil disobedience, the act of defying laws peacefully, as a way for him to spread his idea of an independent India across the globe. The British imposed salt tax law on colonial India, which heavily taxed salt and prohibited Indians from making their own salt. Gandhi recognized the unfairness of the tax, as Indian workers rely heavily on salt to keep them healthy, while the British had less need for the salt. (Doc. A) Because of this unfairness, Gandhi held The Salt March, in an act of civil disobedience he led thousands of his followers to the sea to make their own salt. Gandhi’s vision of nonviolence was strictly followed by the participants.…

    • 548 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although it resulted in thousands of Indian supporters being thrown in jail including Gandhi himself, in January of 1931, the government yielded. “Gandhi was released from custody in January 1931 and began negotiations with Lord Irwin aimed at ending the satyagraha campaign. A truce subsequently was declared, which was formalized in the Gandhi-Irwin pact that was signed on March 5” (Pletcher). This was a major victory for Indian independence and Gandhi would not stop until India was a free country. The victory was short lived as “Gandhi returned to India to find himself imprisoned once again in January 1932 during a crackdown by India’s new viceroy, Lord Willingdon”(Bio). Later that year, an imprisoned Gandhi once again showed the impact of non violent protest when he “embarked on a six-day fast to protest the British decision to segregate the ‘untouchables’ those on the lowest rung of India’s caste system, by allotting them separate electorates” (Bio). The public outcry forced the British to amend the proposal In 1934, Gandhi announced his retirement from politics, in order to concentrate his efforts on working within rural communities. This didn't last long as he was quickly Drawn back into the political fray by the outbreak of World War One. Gandhi quickly took control of the INC, and went right back to work demanding a British withdrawal from India in…

    • 1280 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mahatma Gandhi, Indian nationalist, and the man credited with liberating India from British rule led a campaign of non-violent, civil disobedience that made the continued stay in the country by the British colonizers politically and morally untenable. Imprisoned by the British for fomenting unrest, Gandhi confronted the colonizers’ force of arms with the power of his ideas, and the rightness of his cause, and by his act of courageous disobedience prevailed gloriously over the British in the end. Today, India is a vibrant democracy of 1.2 billion people, free because of the disobedience of one frail, unprepossessing man, Mahatma Gandhi.…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mahatma Gandhi employed a campaign of peaceful resistance in the first half of the twentieth so that India could be independent from Great Britain and possess institutions that protected the rights of Indians. Some years later, American civil rights organizations continued this approach, organizing sit-ins and marches to force governments to change policies that discriminated against African Americans. Martin Luther King Jr. wrote that civil disobedience,“seeks to create such a crisis and foster such a tension that a community which has constantly refused to negotiate is forced to confront the issue”. It uses the power of the people to force institutional action. Civil disobedience tactics can be just as effective today, just look at Cedric Herrou a French farmer who illegally transported African migrants into France for humanitarian reasons.…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In order for non-violence to work, people have to be non-violent. Each of these leaders were so powerful that they convinced even aggressive people to fight by not fighting. In Mandela’s case, he viewed nonresistance as the only way to bring democracy to everyone in South Africa because the government was many times more powerful than the movement (document 3). If Mandela had used violence, his people would have been hopelessly crushed and would remain oppressed. Martin Luther King persuaded all volunteers to give up all possible weapons before going to protest (document 5). He convinced the volunteers that all they needed to have was the ideology that they were right. Gandhi wrote a letter to Lord Irwin stating that if something is not done about the injustice of the British, he would lead a…

    • 606 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mohandas Gandhi emphasizes the use of non-violence in his speech and employs the principle of "spiritual leadership...to achieve political goals through non-violent resistance."(Gandhi 975) Gandhi's essay accents the need for Indian freedom. Gandhi's attitude stressed for the British system of government to change. Gandhi states the overall attitude of the essay, "I wanted to avoid violence, I want to avoid violence. Nonviolence is the first article of my faith. It is also the last article of my creed." (Gandhi 976) Gandhi writes this to state his belief in nonviolent forms of rebellion. Instead, Gandhi's belief that peaceful measures harvest a greater impact on the people creates a greater outcome. Gandhi decides to go against the government of the land, the British government. Gandhi states, "But I had to make my choice. I had either to submit to a system which I considered had done an irreparable harm to my country, or incur the risk of the mad fury of my people bursting forth, when they understood the truth from my lips" (Gandhi 976). Clearly, Gandhi's attitude towards British rule played into a negative path of rebellion which eventually led to his arrest and future Indian independence.…

    • 933 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gandhi used non-violent tactics to free British rule in India. Martin Luther King Jr. mostly used…

    • 776 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his home country of India Gandhi also inspired peaceful resistance towards British rule which eventually brought about Indian independence. However the path towards such independence was littered with violence as some rebels would take the path of violence rather than non-violence. This caused for only “disobedience” instead of “civil disobedience” so that Gandhi’s peaceful resistance may have begun independence, but it also began violent struggles against the government as well as religion later on (Costly). Although the armed rebellions followed the Jainism path of “self-help”, they did not respect that every human contains a soul to be respected (“Jainism”), and even though Gandhi did not support such actions, his civil disobedience did inspire them so that he had both positive and negative impacts on society. Inspired by Gandhi, Martin Luther King Jr. also impacted the free society both positively and negatively.…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    history

    • 609 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The decision to drop the A-bomb was chosen for several reasons, first and foremost to end the war against Japan. This strategy was decided upon because Japan's war-fighting industries were highly concentrated in metropolitan areas, but weren't zoned away from residential areas, and those cities had a high proportion of flammable materials. Operation Downfall was the original plan which caused for a massive invasion of Japan by mostly US forces. The casualty estimates were between 1-3 million. This was unacceptable and of the 100 million people living in Japan, about 90-95 million would be a casualty due to the insanity of the peoples devotion to the Emporer. What came about in the Trinity Project was a way to end the way in the quickest possible way. But it was not only to end the war, another reason is elieved to have been to intimidate the Soviets so that they would vacate eastern Europe (which they didnt do). The US actions were justified and believe it or not, taken literally not a single civilian was killed in the bombings. Japan had declared that if the US invaded Japan they would face an army of 100 million which automatically drafted all of their citizens into their military. Now they were obviously mostly innocent people but you have break eggs to make omlets. A couple hundred thousand people died as a result of the bomb and radiation but again the estimates for the invasion were even worse. The dropping of the Atomic bomb, cruel as it may have been, was absolutely necessary.…

    • 609 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Sepoy Rebellion

    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages

    At first, the power that Britain had over India was that of an indirect rule, where they elected a local official who promised to stay loyal to Britain. In addition, the British East India Company, those with the rule of India at the time, established a military regime called the Sepoys who were loyal to the British and helped keep the Indian people in line. However, things could not always stay like this, especially when the people meant to stay loyal to Britain the most rebelled against them. The Sepoy Rebellion began because of the British using pig and cow fat on the ammunition cartilages, which are both animals that are forbidden to be consumed in the Muslim and Hindu faith. The Sepoys, who were expected to ripe off the ammunition paper before loading their guns saw this as a clear form of disrespect towards their religious beliefs. Although the rebellion led to many deaths on both parts of the battle, the Indians turned out losing when the British managed to suppress the rebellion. Since the British were fed up with the violence and disobedience in their empire the British East India Company lost all political control of the nation, the original empires, like the Mughal, were dissolved of all political power and the local officials who had been put into power were now exchanged for native British men. This all…

    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Peaceful Protest

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Gandhi preached non violence at all costs, even in the face of harsh British retaliation in several cases. In this method, he created one of the largest protest movements of all time in support of Indian self rule. In his famous Salt March to the sea, Gandhi led hundreds of thousands of Indians in a 250 mile march to the sea against an extremely unjust salt taxation, and against the British rule as a whole. Hundreds of thousands joined, and despite harsh reactions by the British, was completely peaceful on the part of the protestors. This march gained international sympathy, and led to the dismissal of the salt tax by the British. Gandhi was eventually successful in making India self ruling, the entire time devoted to nonviolent methods. In this way, a new democratic society rose up through nonviolent…

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mohandas Gandhi launched a policy of nonviolent noncooperation against the British following the Massacre at Amritsar in 1919 (Boss, 2012). He used his moral outrage guided by reason to effect change in the cultural norms of India and ultimately helped India gain independence in 1947. Gandhi’s efforts have greatly impacted social and political reform, and have influenced later civil rights movements.…

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Nonalignment had its origins in India's colonial experience and the nonviolent Indian independence struggle led by the Congress, which left India determined to be the master of its fate in an international system dominated politically by Cold War alliances and economically by Western capitalism and Soviet communism. The principles of nonalignment, as articulated by Nehru and his successors, were preservation of India's freedom of action internationally through refusal to align India with any bloc or alliance, particularly those led by the United States or the Soviet Union; nonviolence and international cooperation as a means of settling international disputes. Nonalignment was a consistent feature of Indian foreign policy by the late 1940s and enjoyed strong, almost unquestioning support among the Indian elite.…

    • 7889 Words
    • 32 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Quit India Movement

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages

    On July 1942, the Indian National Congress passed a resolution demanding complete independence from the British government. The draft proposed that if the British did not accede to the demands, massive civil disobedience would be launched. However, it proved to be controversial within the party. A prominent congress national leader chakravarti Rajagopalachari quit the congress over this decision and so did some local and regional level organizers. Jawaharlal Nehru and Maulana Azad were apprehensive and critical of the call, but backed it and stuck with Gandhiji’s leadership till the end. Sardar Vallabhai Patel, Dr. Rajendra Prasad, Asoka Mehta and Jaya Prakash Narayan were openly and enthusiastically in favor of such a disobedience movement. The congress had lesser success in rallying other political forces under a single flag and mast. Smaller parties like the communist party of India and the Hindu Mahasabha opposed the call. Jinnah’s opposition to the call led to large numbers of Muslims cooperating with the British.…

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays