Preview

How Can Evolution And Creation Be Proven False?

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
215 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Can Evolution And Creation Be Proven False?
Scientific theories must be testable and capable of being proven false. Neither evolution nor biblical creation qualifies as a scientific theory in the sense, because each deals wit historical events that cannot be repeated. Both evolution and creation are based on unobserved assumptions about past events. It is inconcsistent to say that evolution qualifies as a scientific theory while creation does not.

Declarative knowledge involves knowing that something is true and is assessed by having students state what they know. Procedural knowledge involves doing something using a technique that has been learned. It is assessed by providing a previously unused situation that involves application of the technique to determine whether the student can

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    |[pic] |both bird and bats have essentially the same skeletal units in their forelimbs |…

    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Phase 2 Ip

    • 274 Words
    • 2 Pages

    All scientific theories must be able to make testable predictions. Such predictions are based on observations. Experiments can then be conducted to verify (or falsify) such predictions. Darwin theorized that evolution occurred through natural selection; however, this may not have occurred in smooth process. Some evolutionary theorists suggest that evolution by natural selection occurred in step-wise fashion.…

    • 274 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hummanities 3991

    • 2100 Words
    • 9 Pages

    When we talk about science, many people hear the term “theory”. The definition of a scientific theory can become confusing since many people interpret the meaning differently. When a person uses the term “theory” in a sentence it is usually used in a non-scientific way. They assume that a theory is something assumed, but not proven. When the term “theory” is used in science, it means an explanation based on observation, experimentation, and reasoning. It has been tested and confirmed as a general principle to explain phenomena. A scientific theory must be based on careful examination of facts. “A theory is a hypothesis or set of hypotheses that has stood the test and (so far, at least) has not been contradicted by evidence” (Suplee 9).…

    • 2100 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Some people believe that only science is correct. There is no evidence of the seven days of creation except by word, whereas all theories of evolution and the Big Bang have a large amount of evidence, and hundreds of hours of research dedicated to them. Evolution and the Big Bang have explanations for and biological reasons, whereas why would a God suddenly decide to make a universe and planet for living organisms?…

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although the Darwinian evolution theory came out 150 years ago when it was first introduced in On the Origin of Species in 1859, nowadays there are still many people who firmly believe in the creationism, even some who are well educated. In chapter three of River Out of Eden Richard Dawkins brings out this situation and refutes creationism by citing scientific experiments, and finally he points out that gradualism is a principle of the evolution nature world, one that becomes indispensable when one is trying to explain complex phenomena.…

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Scopes Code

    • 648 Words
    • 3 Pages

    William Jennings stated that evolution is a hypothesis not a theory, the definitions of a hypothesis is a proposition that is consistent with known data but has been neither verified nor shown to be false. Although the theory of evolution isn’t proven to be true neither was the creation story in the bible which states in Genesis 2:7 And the Lord God formed man of the dust from the ground and breathed life into his nostrils; and man became a living soul, this has not been proven either, therefore making the bible’s creation story a hypothesis also, contradicting Jennings’ and all those who say that evolution should not be taught because it isn’t true because the same could be could be said on the part of the bibles description of the creation of man.…

    • 648 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Big Picture Questions

    • 351 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The difference between religiously based myths of origin and creation stories derived from scientific accounts is that religiously based myths can just be accepted and believed once heard from a person. The scientific accounts claim to be truer and make much more sense. They can be checked and cleared by anyone/anything for proof. The creation stories rely largely on fields of education, like astronomy, physics, geology, biology, etc. The religiously based myths, according to the Nahavo in the beginning, became a story of the world created by the Holy People. It was said that the first man and woman were formed from white and yellow corn ears. To the Ancient Greeks, the birth of Earth and Sky created the universe. For the biblical people and Hebrews, it was told that God created everything, including man who was placed in the Garden of Eden. Overall, many people now believe the creation stories derived from scientific accounts because they have more factual evidence.…

    • 351 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the main scientific theories that opposes Creation story’s is Evolution a theory that was discovered by Charles Darwin. It shows that living things evolve and adapt to their environment over millions of years so that they can survive. This strongly opposes Creation story's as Most creation story’s depict god making everything whilst Darwin shows us evolving from apes.…

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    "The fact of evolution is the backbone of biology, and biology is thus in the peculiar position of being a science founded on an improved theory, is it then a science or faith?" Charles Darwin…

    • 3622 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    A Young Earth

    • 390 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Many scientists and creationist are Bible believing Christian like Isaac Newton, Edward Blyth, Kurt Wise, and Inn Taylor who is the president of creation research Family Radio, Oakland, CA and host of others who believe in a literal Genesis as the word of God which is accurate and without any error, also agreed with Genesis that God created the heaven and the earth in 6 days, 24 hours and no other wise like millions or billions as evolutionist perceived. The Bible is the truth word of God. “Sanctify them by the truth; your word is truth.” 2 The web site www.answersingenesis.org explained many questions and misconception that one may have about Genesis…

    • 390 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As Watson stated in "The Value of Theories", a scientific theory is a systematic explanation that unifies various observed phenomena and facts. Based on observations we make, science operates under theories which are constantly revised and checked by experiment. A scientific theory also possesses many vital qualities for true understanding.…

    • 643 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Some evolutionists advance one of several theories known as "theistic evolution." One variation of this theory states that God is the "Creator" of the universe in that He guided its evolutionary process. This idea, too, fails to measure up to the evidence. If evolution of any form were true, then the fossil record would show millions of transitional forms in every layer of geological stratum. However, no such transitional form has ever been found. This lack of scientific and paleontological evidence lends support to my conclusion that Creation is the only logical model for how the universe came into being. Suffice it to say, I believe what the Bible says about Creation is the absolute truth.…

    • 1029 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    In order to say that an idea is more than a theory, we must first understand the many definitions of the word “theory”. Dawkins says that two of the definitions are of importance here. In the first definition, theory is described as an accepted idea that explains facts and it has been confirmed or proven. The second definition describes theory as a hypothesis or idea used to try to explain facts, an explanation through a personal view. Dawkins says that scientists use the first definition and creationists use the second.…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Evolution is not suggesting that humans evolved just through chance, because evolution does not work by chance. Evolution is a much longer process and a change develops over many years. Evolution works through natural selection, which is also not a random selection or change. Although mutation occurs, which may cause random changes that may or may not be beneficial, evolution itself is not random.…

    • 330 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Though some states do teach both and very few teach how evolution is wrong, the majority of public school students in the US are taught evolution. Creation is a belief and evolution is a scientific theory. Different published works will say contrasting things about this controversy and how well, scientifically speaking the two sides stack against each other. Neither creation nor evolution can be proven using the scientific method because they can’t be tested. All that is left to do is take the evidence left by both sides and compare them to how well they fit into the science and history of the…

    • 3363 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays