Preview

How Did Hitler's Decision To Receive Appeasement

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
565 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Did Hitler's Decision To Receive Appeasement
On September 30, 1938, the leaders of Nazi Germany, Great Britain, France and Italy signed an agreement that allowed the Sudetenland, a region of Czechoslovakia that was home to many ethnic Germans. Nazi leader Adolf Hitler had threatened to take the Sudetenland by force. The Czechoslovakian government resisted, but its allies Britain and France were determined to avoid war at all costs, they were willing to try and negotiate with Hitler. On September 29, Hitler met the Prime Minister of Britain Neville of Britain, Prime Minister Edouard of France and Prime Minister Benito of Italy to try and reach a final settlement. The Czechoslovakian leaders were not included in the discussion, but they were given a choice by Britain and France to accept …show more content…

It was the policy to accompanied by the British Prime Minister, Neville Chamberlain. The aim was to try and reach an agreement with Germany to try and settle its trouble once and for all. It was based on the opinion that Germany had valid complaints as the terms of Versailles were very harsh and that it was not worth going to war over distant territories and that would be difficult to critical to defend. Britain had made a deal to Hitler in hope that would be satisfied. In the final stage, it gave Britain time to rearm and prepare for war if it came to that. With knowledge, many people have blamed Neville for being naïve and foolish in trying to trust Hitler, who has proven to be cruel and always broke promises. Some have gone as far as trying to accuse Neville for being a coward by trying to avoid war. The Treaty of Versailles had been very harsh on Germany and it seemed right to try and settle wrongs by trying to negotiate. Britain and France were happy like Hitler was the only true thing of getting back to what belonged to Germany. The British government was trying to deal with the depression and did not want to spend large sums of money on arms. It was thought that by surrendering to Hitler he could be trusted and it would reduce the chances of war. Some people approved of Hitler’s policies especially since the way he had reduced unemployment. It was not at all certain that the empire would support

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    German Aggression Dbq

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Within two years of consolidating power over Germany, Hitler and the Nazi Party had commenced operations to reverse the provisions of the Treaty of Versailles which had treated the German people in an unfair manner. Among these reversals included foreign diplomatic measures which would ensure that Germany would annex the territories it had lost at the conclusion of World War One. In September of 1938, with Europe on the brink of yet another major war, Great Britain’s Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain called the four powers – Germany, Italy, France, and Great Britain – to convene in Munich and address German aggression against Czechoslovakia and the Sudetenland. Among Neville Chamberlain’s goals for the conference was the notion to avoid…

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Germany was weak towards the end of 1918, the naval blockade had starved the nation and Germany was no longer able to continue without having to face total loss. The high command were aware of this and also had knowledge of Wilson’s 14 point, they agreed to have a peace treaty. The Treaty of Versailles was put together…

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    On August 23, 1939, delegates from Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union met and marked the Nazi-Soviet Non-Aggression Pact (likewise called the German-Soviet Non-Aggression Pact and the Ribbentrop-Molotov Pact), which ensured that the two nations would not assault each other. By signing this pact, Germany had protected itself from having to fight a two-front war in the soon-to-begin World War II. Consequently, as a component of a mystery addendum, the Soviet Union was to be granted land, including parts of Poland and the Baltic States. The agreement was broken when Nazi Germany assaulted the Soviet Union under two years after the fact, on June 22, 1941.…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Intimidation from Fascist leaders was a factor that led to the illogical events of World War II. Adolf Hitler, chancellor of Germany, justified his barbaric actions on his attempt to benefit the "superior" German race. The effects of his ambitions were displayed during the Munich Conference in 1938. Hitler invited the Prime Minister of Britain and the Premier of France and demanded that the Sudetenland become part of Germany. Due to France and Britain's fear of another war, Hitler's demand was accepted. The appeasement, or agreement in order to maintain peace, at the Munich Conference was said to have "saved Europe from a world war," as stated by William Shirer. Contrary to Shirer, Europe would still be involved in war and things would only get worse.…

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Outline of Wwii

    • 3049 Words
    • 13 Pages

    1938 - Hitler wanted to annex the Sudetenland, a portion of Czechoslovakia whose inhabitents were mostly German-speaking. On Sept. 29, Germany, Italy, France, and Great Britain signed the Munich Pact, which gave Germany the Sudetenland. British Prime Minister Chamberlain justified the pact with the belief that appeasing Germany would prevent war.…

    • 3049 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    France and UK came up with the policy of appeasement which was a policy with nazi germany that would allow hitler to take a lot more land than he was supposed to. The reason being is the policy was put into place so that the UK and france would let Hitler do what he wanted as long as he didnt do what they told him not to do. The policy of appeasement however did not work because Hitler was not someone you could appease. Once Hitler invaded poland the policy ended thus ending the reign of letting hitler walk all over…

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    From 1933 to 1934, during the consolidation of Nazi party and the process of Gleichschaltung, the Nazi party presented themselves as a less aggressive force than they would later prove to be. The Nazi party had considerable popular support in Germany from 1933 due to their strong opposition to the Treaty of Versailles. When Germany withdrew from the League of Nations and the World Disarmament Conference in October 1933, this was eagerly accepted in Germany due to its association with the Treaty. A Non-Agression Pact was signed with Poland in 1934 and this significantly bolstered the Nazi party’s image in the international scene. Hitler reinforced this new image of a peaceful Germany in a speech in May 1933 stating “The French, the Poles etc. are our neighbours, and we know that through no possible development of history can this reality be altered.” In June of 1935, Germany signed the Anglo-German Naval Treaty with Britain in which Germany agreed to have only 35% of the size of the British Army. For the Germans, this signified the end of the military terms of the Treaty of Versailles and was used as propaganda to promote the Nazi party in Britain. With the rest of Europe lulled into a false sense of security about Hitler’s foreign policy aims, a policy of ‘brinkmanship’ was employed.…

    • 1495 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Suetonius is well known for his major historical work entitled The Twelve Caesars in which he analyzes the lives of twelve Roman emperors starting with Julius Caesar and ending with Domitian. The Twelve Caesars is considered to be an accurate and reliable primary source; however, it is a little bit biased in the sense that Suetonius is not always impartial in his assessments of the Roman emperors. It seems that Suetonius gives very good treatment to those emperors that he likes and very harsh treatment to those emperors that he dislikes, which says quite a lot about his integrity as a historian. For example, as is mentioned…

    • 1565 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Within Dostoyevsky’s The Grand Inquisitor and Herman Melville’s Bartleby the Scrivener are expressive figures facing problems of an existential nature. Consumed by an inability to find purpose in life, their actions and reactions become characterized by absurd and illogical streaks. The characters begin to align with the ideas surrounding existentialism, most notably with the “sense of disorientation and confusion in the face of an apparently meaningless or absurd world." As they attempt to understand their place in the world, the determination of these characters is as thrilling as it is tragic. With the underlying flight or fight approach to survival revealed, these characters give us a rare, yet familiar insight into the impact of disenchantment…

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Aspartame

    • 1333 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Aspartame has been proven to be 160 to 220 times sweeter then real sugar This synthetic chemical is commonly known as NutraSweet or Equal. Over half of the U.S. population currently consumes it. Aspartame came onto the market in 1981, and has accounted for more then half of all the complaints that the FDA receives each year. Aspartame was accidentally discovered in 1965 by a chemist trying to develop an ulcer drug. The FDA earlier then 1981 did not approve it because it had been tested with animals that eventually contracted brain tumors and had seizures. Eventually the FDA caved into the political and money making scheme. Since it's release it has been supported by few and condoned by many. "The dangers of aspartame include headache, dizziness, poor equilibrium, confusion, impaired or double vision, convulsions, ringing in the ears, slurred speech, tremors, extreme fatigue, motor and sensory disturbances affecting the limbs, and other neuropsychiatry complaints" (Blaylock 4). The most common ways to be exposed to Aspartame are through "diet" soft drinks, tabletop sweeteners, and sugar-free gums. Unfortunately, another tragic problem has been neglected: addiction to aspartame products. When people realize that aspartame might be hurting them they try to stop and they then suffer from with-drawl affects. The FDA to this day still supports its decision to keep making aspartame and continues to do so. While researching this topic I found it very hard to find any concrete evidence that aspartame is harmful to your health. I found several internet articles that were against the sale and use of aspartame. I also found books at the library that gave scientific proof that aspartame was not safe to eat. Granted that there are two sides to every story, I will give evidence from both sides of the spectrum. In this project, this paper will examine both sides of the aspartame issue. Then the paper will discuss why the FDA should take Aspartame out the…

    • 1333 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Additionally, everyone thought that Hitler wanted peace and nothing more than that because of the speeches that he gave to the public. Hitler true motives were started to show in the speeches that he delivered. At the start of 1937, he assured all Germans that Germany was running out of space because they were getting over populated and they needed to expand Germany. Acording to History.com “ On September 30, 1938, Adolf Hitler, Benito Mussolini, French Premier Edouard Daladier, and British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain signed the Munich Pact, which sealed the fate of Czechoslovakia, virtually handing it over to Germany in the name of peace.” The Munich Pact was signed because Hitler believed that most of the people in the border of Czechoslovakia are…

    • 1820 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1. This statement is quite accurate in many ways. This time in history, where Hitler was gaining power he could be related to a child. The reasons he can be consider a child, because he is like a kid who is pushing his limits. Great Britain's and France's appeasement only makes it worse. When a child breaks a rule and they are punished to keep them from doing it again. With Hitler, he kept breaking treaties and known one would do anything, so he kept pushing his limits. Eventually someone decides to do something and it was too late and Hitler had rebuilt German. A main example to this statement is when Hitler declares that Germany will not follow the treaty of Versailles. He then begins to build up Germany’s army again with no one trying to stop him.(p.860). Hitler continued these types of actions all the way up to World War 2.…

    • 302 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Higher History

    • 673 Words
    • 3 Pages

    There was a large lack of confidence in British defences in 1938, they were poorly equipped and what they did have were nothing compared to new modern warfare equipment other countries possessed. It’s strongly arguable that by September 1939 Britain were far more prepared for a war with Germany and if they had rushed into it a year before, they would have gotten destroyed. At the end of the war Hitler claims that if he’d got war when he wanted it in 1938 he would have won. In comparison many believe that Czechoslovakia was the most well defended country in Europe at the time, they had a strong army and their borders would be difficult to pass through. Without British and French support they would not react however, if all three parties had come together it is possible they would most likely to have been powerful enough to overthrow Hitler from the very start. Opinions considering this situation are very much split for the overall success of the Munich agreements.…

    • 673 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hitler wanted to expand the German land for economic means and used the Treaty of Versailles as an excuse to invade Poland. Hitler demanded more out of the French and British Governments, and they decided to give a small portion of Czechoslovakia; Hitler wasn’t satisfied; he invaded the whole of Czechoslovakia in 1939. The French and British Governments at the time didn’t want a repeat of World War I and had an intention of appeasing Hitler to stop further…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Concentration Camp

    • 1447 Words
    • 6 Pages

    With the terms of the Treaty of Versailles impacting Germany, the Germans needed someone to blame…

    • 1447 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays