Preview

How Did Israel Go To War?

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2148 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Did Israel Go To War?
Since its founding in 1948, Israel has almost continuously been at war. First the 1948 Arab-Israeli War, then the Suez Crisis in 1956, the Six-Day War in 1967, the Yom Kippur War of 1973, the 1982 Lebanon War, the 2006 Lebanon War, and several wars in Gaza (2008, 2012, 2014). The two Intifadas of 1987 and 2000 could also be seen as wars. Israel claims that it is surrounded by enemies bent on destroying it, and this is undoubtedly true to some extent. Upon closer analysis, however, especially of the wars of 1967, 1973, and 1982, we may observe that many of the conflicts were, in fact, unnecessary, and that Israel may have had other motivations for going to war. In fact, Israel perpetually looks for violent solutions to questions that can be …show more content…
Israel had come closer than ever before to destruction, and the threat of annihilation and genocide after the Holocaust was still looming over its head. Israel’s existentialist rhetoric had finally become a reality and 1973 served as undeniable proof that Israel was surrounded by neighbors all bent upon its destruction. Another immensely important fact was that the Arab armies attacked on Yom Kippur, the most holy of Jewish holidays. This made the war extremely symbolic. It now represented Israeli survival in the face of those who wanted to destroy it, and further served as a powerful unifying factor between all components of Israeli society. The Yom Kippur War solidified three important concepts in the Israeli mindset: Israeli would never be at peace with its Arab neighbors, Israel would always be endangered by them, and Israeli cold never peacefully coexist with …show more content…
Should Israel be a Jewish state? Would a true Jewish state be antidemocratic, infringing upon the rights of Israel’s Arab and Druze citizens? Where can the proper balance between secularism and Judaism be struck? What role should Jewish law have on the Israeli legal system? Again, this is just one of many internal cleavages dividing Israel, but not necessarily related to the Palestinian question or Israel’s neighbors, along with the Ashkenazim-Sephardim/Mizrahim divide and the question over the role of Ethiopian immigrants in Israeli

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    When the state of Israel was born, the Jewish people did not yet know what being an Israeli means. Although people lived there for many years, the country was not yet established, and many of its future residents were surviving the consternation camps of WWII. Then, in 1948, David Ben Gurion declared Israel independent. From that moment on the Jewish state had to handle the growing amount of immigration, the criticism it received and continues to receive from the world, and most importantly set its values. Today, the Israeli Army is considered one of the strongest and most humane armies in the world. However, the Israelis themselves changed their perception of the Army through the years and by that the Israeli culture of war. Hill 24 Doesn’t answer (1955), Hill Halfon Doesn’t…

    • 1469 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Israel’s success in dealing with the treats it came across was due to many factors. These included Israel’s military tactics; which is one of the most important ones. Israeli determination for an independent state, the disunity between the Arab people, territory and the role of the US all played a part in the triumph of Israeli survival in the years 1948 – 73.…

    • 963 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Throughout the 20th Century relations between Arabs and Israelis in Palestine have undergone immense tension, change and deterioration, with both parties facing many barriers to peace. Foreign intervention is often listed as one such barrier to this peace. While the importance of foreign intervention cannot be omitted, other factors can be argued to have been both equally and more detrimental to the peace process. These include the founding of the Haganah, the 1948 War after the declaration of the State of Israel, and the rise of political extremism. The aim of this essay is to identify which barrier among so many was most significant in the hundred year period from 1900 to 2000.…

    • 1731 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Bibliography: Bialer, Uri. Cross on the star of david: The Christian World in Israel 's Foreign Policy,1948-1967. Bloomington, Ind.: Indiana University press, 2005.…

    • 4506 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    The Israeli-Palestinian conflict has proven to be one of the most complex and “intractable” conflicts of modern history – or as some may even add – of all time. And after many decades of failed attempts at peacemaking in this region, there still seems to be no conceivable end to the conflict. During those same decades, most of the parties involved as well as the international community have embraced the idea of a two-state solution, but the question we pose today asks whether this solution is still a viable option considering the present context, and if not, is it finally time to consider a one-state solution? This essay will argue that although a two-state solution remains the more desirable and popular option, keeping in-line with both nations’ desire for freedom, civic rights, dignity, statehood and nationhood, it may no longer be a possibility in the near future and as time passes. A one-state solution also has its faults however, as it simply fails to address the issue of inevitable future conflicts and retaliation, which would stem from the most problematic symptom of a bi-national state: the reduction of Palestinian-Israelis to second-class citizens within their own country. Finally, the essay will attempt to show that regardless of what the more desirable and feasible option may be, the context today points to a de facto one-state reality, which some argue would ultimately need to be embraced as the only option.…

    • 2385 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    There are two solutions to the problem, the one-state solution and the two-state solution. The one-state solution would combine Israel, the Gaza strip and the West Bank into one country. There are two sides to this solution. One of them is favored by some Palestinians, creating a single democratic country where Arab Muslims would outnumber Jews. This would essentially end Israel as a Jewish state as the identity would be washed out with the Palestinian Arab population. The other side is favored by some Israelis. This involves Israel taking control of the West Bank and forcing out the Palestinians or taking away their right to vote. However, this has been rejected by many, including Zionists, the extremist Jewish group, as it is a human rights violation. The two-state solution is exactly what it sounds like, a separate Israel and separate Palestine. This would satisfy both the Israelis and Palestinians as both countries run separately. This two-state solution “has been the goal of the international community for decades, dating back to the 1947 UN Partition Plan, and many nations say that it is the only way out of the conflict,” according to Oren Liebermann, Angela Dewan, and Lauren Said-Moorhouse of CNN. However, the inability of Israelis and Palestinians to decide on terms of a two-state solution poses interest in a one-state solution, partially since if the two sides…

    • 1378 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ella Habiba Shohat

    • 257 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In this article, Ella Habiba Shohat, discusses the domination of European Jews, the Ashkenazim, over the voices of the Arab Jews, the Sephardim. The Zionist master narrative portrays the idea that “Zionism ‘saved’ the Sephardim from the harsh rule of their Arab ‘captors,’” while modernizing and integrating them into their own European culture. (270). The Ashkenazi Israeli equates the Sephardi to the Arab, as uneducated and primitive, yet blame and view them as the “obstacle to peace” because of their supposed hatred of the Arab, creating an attitude portraying a colonial parallel operative. Shohat correlates the history of Zionism with that of the Palestinians and Sephardi, stating, “An essential feature of colonialism is the distortion and…

    • 257 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After the war, hostilities between the Arab countries and Israel did not diminish—in fact, a war of attrition began from that same year, 1967, until 1973. A sort of “cold war” of the Middle East, the significance of this was the unsettling back and forth raids and skirmishes between the Arab League and Israel. The Arabs refused to acknowledge Israel as a country in the Khartoum Negotiations of 1967 and refused to negotiate. Instead, they bided their time until they amassed their forces to…

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Palestine, or is it Israel? Either way, it is a highly contested land between two major Semitic groups: the Arabs, and the Hebrews. From the late 19th century, and throughout the 20th century it has been the focal point of Arab nationalism and Jewish Zionism. Today, it has become the Jewish state of Israel with occupied Palestinian Territories called the West Bank, which lies on the West side of the Jordan River, and the Gaza Strip, which borders Israel and Egypt. But, should the Palestinians deserve a state of their own? This essay will investigate the Palestinian side of the argument, their Biblical and Quranic ties to the land, the State of Palestine should have been created under Jordanian Egyptian as well as Israeli occupation of the land, and finally Israel’s poor relations with Palestine and colonial occupation of the land has led to the formation of many radical groups.…

    • 2176 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Arab-Israeli War of 1948-49 was an extremely significant event in the history of Arab-Israeli conflict. At the time it was the first military conflict the new state of Israel has been involved in. Never before had its forces been truly tested in the field of conflict, and its military capabilities was still relatively unknown. However it was significant as it highlighted the true power the Israelis had, with the result of a crushing defeat for the Arabs, and the Israeli’s ability to retain the independence of their newly created state. However there is much disagreement over which side was in fact responsible for the ‘Nakba’ (catastrophe in Arabic). Although the Israeli success can be seen as major indicator of their military strength, it can also be judged that due to the weaknesses of the Arab coalition and the difficulties they faced during the war, this may have been the most significant factor in contributing to the ‘Nakba’.…

    • 1847 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, discriminatory measures are certainly not supported by Judaism, the shared identity between the majority and the Israeli government. As a peace loving religion, Judaism affirms that all men are of equal value and worth, and are inherently pure and good. Similarly, American military airstrikes that kill civilians are not democratic, as they violate the grounding principle of basic human rights as the state cannot take away. Thus, by taking actions that are not supported by Judaism and democracy respectively in combating the threat of the Other, these countries fail to effectively promote and abide by the common identity upon which they have securitized the Other. Hence, it is clear that ulterior socio-economic and political motives lie in the adoption of discriminatory policies by the Israeli government and the increase in military air strikes by the American government, although they are publicized as efforts to mitigate the…

    • 580 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What do you think are the key issues at stake in the discussion within the Jewish world over whether the modern State of Israel should be understood as a state for Jews or a Jewish state? Is it posbbile for it both to be a ‘Jewish and Democratic state’.…

    • 5953 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United Nations decided in a vote that the territory would be divided into two separate states – an Arab one and a Jewish state. The plan was accepted by the Jewish population in 1948 and the state of Israel was formed. The Palestinians and surrounding Arab nations were outraged at this decision and many attacked the new state as soon as it was proclaimed. Israel was able to defend itself from these attacks and forced back the attackers, claiming more territory in the process. As a result, over nine hundred thousand Palestinians were forced out of the region and their homes, causing a persistent refugee problem that still exists today.…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This situation is consider as dispute because was a repercussion of a broader conflict, the war between Palestinians and Israelis; the differences in religion, believes and culture were the main causes of this dispute. This dispute was a violent, real, destructive, retributive, realistic, intergroup and interests’ conflict with ideological and historical causes and a parochial scope.…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Israel Position Paper

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages

    By creating a Palestinian state several of the Middle East issues could be solved. One of the major problems between these two sides is the West Bank and Gaza Strip occupation. Israel has taken this territory as theirs since the 6-day war. From that time on Israel has build and grow its population about 220,000 (In a Nutshell: Israeli Palestinian Conflict P. 2). This has been mostly in the West Bank. As a result Palestinians insist withdrawal from the territory. In the Camp David Accord Israel agreed on giving full Palestinian control over the Gaza Strip and most of the West Bank. These would certain conditions such as: The state would not have an army with heavy weapons and Israel would lease areas in the Jordan Valley or maintain temporary sovereignty over them for up to 25 years. Palestinians rejected this treaty.…

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays